<![CDATA[Why isn't Weeden gone?]]>Shouldn't that chump be cleaning out his locker, with his severence check in pocket?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/28025/why-isn-t-weeden-goneRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 06:03:45 GMTTue, 31 Dec 2013 15:00:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:35:24 GMT]]>

@d-bone said:

Not to, but too (as in also)

Or do "it" to.....

😮

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376207https://brownsboard.com/post/376207Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:35:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:29:06 GMT]]>

Orange85 said:

Please add cheese to that burger for me! 😉

not qualified to make a great burger. but i'm know to make a nice chocolate 'frosty' on monday morning after watching the turds play.

care for one in a cup?

sorry mine don't come cold.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376189https://brownsboard.com/post/376189Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:29:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:50:39 GMT]]>

@clevfan4life said:

c'mon, it's you....or family/close friend of his.

lmao 😆

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376174https://brownsboard.com/post/376174Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:50:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:39:34 GMT]]>

Orange85 said:

Could only wish I made his money! I bet you do to little boy.

c'mon, it's you....or family/close friend of his.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376171https://brownsboard.com/post/376171Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:39:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:33:46 GMT]]>Weeden is literally the red headed step child of this regime.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376096https://brownsboard.com/post/376096Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:33:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:38:51 GMT]]>

Orange85 said:

I bet you do to little boy.

Not to, but too (as in also)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376066https://brownsboard.com/post/376066Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:38:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:21:35 GMT]]>But as a third stringer he's....nope he's still a turd

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376023https://brownsboard.com/post/376023Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:21:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:12:53 GMT]]>

@d-bone said:

Anyone here that thinks Brandy isn't a turd in the context of being compared to his peers, in the profession that he has chosen is a turd themselves. There isn't a person on this forum that can play QB better than Brandy, and pointing that out is very helpful Capt Obvious. People that are calling him out for being a turd, lamo, idiot, moron, jackass, brain dead, ect.. are all doing so while comparing him to any other one of the 31 NFL QBs.....Duh.

He might even be the worst back up in the league as well which puts him at about 64th on the list of NFL QB's.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376017https://brownsboard.com/post/376017Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:12:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:00:46 GMT]]>Anyone here that thinks Brandy isn't a turd in the context of being compared to his peers, in the profession that he has chosen is a turd themselves. There isn't a person on this forum that can play QB better than Brandy, and pointing that out is very helpful Capt Obvious. People that are calling him out for being a turd, lamo, idiot, moron, jackass, brain dead, ect.. are all doing so while comparing him to any other one of the 31 NFL QBs.....Duh.

Orange85 said:

Please add cheese to that burger for me! 😉

I made you a very special one, just for you.............enjoy

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/376010https://brownsboard.com/post/376010Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:00:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:39:46 GMT]]>Again, I think it's a matter of scope. I don't think (most) people actually mean that the players are "low life's" compared to the people posting, I think they mean in comparison to other players.

Let's say I had a surgery and the surgeon made a few significant surgical mistakes. I might call the guy a quack. I don't mean that he's a "quack" compared to me. If he knows the proper way to scrub up and arrange the lighting in the operating room he knows more than I do already. What I mean is that he's a quack compared to his peers (of whom I am not one). That's kind of understood in my making of the statement. No reasonable person thinks I mean that I am a better surgeon than this guy. It is assumed that I mean that AMONG SURGEONS he's in the lowest range.

We expect professionals to be more skilled than us in the areas in which they specialize. That's how our society operates. If I can't cook well, it doesn't mean that I don't expect my meal to be good when I go eat at a restaurant. In fact, we expect that these professionals are getting paid because they are good at what they do. So to say that these guys are making a lot of money isn't reason to cut them more slack, it's actually reason to expect more from them.

I have a job in which people expect a certain service from me. That service involves a skill that none of my clients possesses. However, if I do a crappy job when they hire me and they call me out on the fact that I did a crappy job, it's not a valid response for me to say to them, "Well, you can't do better!" Of course they can't. That's why I'm getting paid to do it. That doesn't mean I didn't do my job to a crappy degree.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375998https://brownsboard.com/post/375998Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:39:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:38:43 GMT]]>

Orange85 said:

It cracks me up when people call these professional athletes "turds". Did the guy perform in Cleveland like fans wanted? No. But he was a professional athlete in 2 sports. I assume most of you name callers probably sat the bench in little league. So keep calling names and get back to your jobs at McDonalds while these "turds" make millions as a back up somewhere.

Hi Brandon.....so what are your plans this offseason? Gonna work on that shovel pass?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375996https://brownsboard.com/post/375996Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:38:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:28:51 GMT]]>In a way I agree, and in a way I don't. I don't like it when people explicitly or implicitly claim that they themselves could do better than a professional athlete. That's ridiculous. That being said, I don't think it's unreasonable to criticize a player IN COMPARISON TO OTHER PLAYERS. I have a friend who is a professional drummer. Compared to the best professional drummers, he's a shitty drummer. He'll tell you that himself. Is the guy a better drummer than me? Absolutely. Is he better than someone who only drummed in elementary school for the 5th grade band? Sure; ridiculously better. Is he better at drumming than some professional football player who is great at football but doesn't know a thing about drumming? Of course. However, if you put my friend on stage with a legendary rock band and asked him to perform at their level, you'd be well within your rights (even if you couldn't drum yourself) to say that he is a shitty drummer.

So, if Weeden comes to my town and plays backyard football with me, he'll be amazing. But, as long as he's on an NFL field, competing with and against NFL players, I don't feel like it is unreasonable to say that he's not good, even if the person saying that isn't good themselves.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375985https://brownsboard.com/post/375985Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:28:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:26:10 GMT]]>

Orange85 said:

It cracks me up when people call these professional athletes "turds". Did the guy perform in Cleveland like fans wanted? No. But he was a professional athlete in 2 sports. I assume most of you name callers probably sat the bench in little league. So keep calling names and get back to your jobs at McDonalds while these "turds" make millions as a back up somewhere.

GTFO turd

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375982https://brownsboard.com/post/375982Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:26:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 16:06:44 GMT]]>Weeden will end up a backup somewhere, just not here.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375963https://brownsboard.com/post/375963Wed, 01 Jan 2014 16:06:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 05:51:47 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

Not sure what good that would do at this point. We don't even have a coach. We are paying him either way, no need to release him until after the draft if then.

Zombo

Zombo said:

The idea would be you throw him into a draft pick exchange to a team that needs competition at backup QB, it's good idea ... that's how we got rid of Quinn and McCoy, I believe ... but Weeden has too much guaranteed money, I think they either release him or bring him to camp.

Zombo

Z- don't expect the NFL GMs to come calling over Weeden- he sucks beyond belief. We'd have to give up draft picks and pick up part of his salary just to get rid of him.

Cut him now- hey job-tardi- what you waiting for to clear the dead wood?

Here's a hint- send Lavaou, Sixty year old McGahee, and a few others along with him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375924https://brownsboard.com/post/375924Wed, 01 Jan 2014 05:51:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:35:22 GMT]]>Like a ball boy?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375902https://brownsboard.com/post/375902Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:35:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:31:43 GMT]]>camp meat, hitting dummy, etc.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375899https://brownsboard.com/post/375899Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:31:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:29:20 GMT]]>Isn't he getting a a million or so this year? for a third stringer at any cost is he worth it?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375897https://brownsboard.com/post/375897Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:29:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:25:13 GMT]]>At this point with the new rookie wage scale its cheaper to keep her or him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375896https://brownsboard.com/post/375896Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:25:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:18:21 GMT]]>This is actually a good point started, why on earth is weeden still here but our first year coach who inherited that hot mess is gone?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375892https://brownsboard.com/post/375892Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:18:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:08:42 GMT]]>But hey could be worse. We could hire mangini back and send the #1 overall pick to D league. Lol

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375891https://brownsboard.com/post/375891Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:08:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:27:14 GMT]]>Don't forget my bag of peanuts!!!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375839https://brownsboard.com/post/375839Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:27:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:20:51 GMT]]>

@lbc-mike said:

Draft trade bait material.

Ill give u a 6th round pick for Brandon Weeden and ur 2nd round pick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375837https://brownsboard.com/post/375837Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:20:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why isn't Weeden gone? on Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:04:30 GMT]]>

@spectralcow said:

Nah. I mean, I'd like to never see Weeden on the field as a Brown again, but I don't necessarily think they should give anything up to get rid of him. According to Haslam, there's plenty of cap room (for what they have in mind, I guess), so there doesn't seem to be any financial urgency to get rid of him. I mean, sure, it would be nice not to have to pay him, but I don't know if they need to give stuff up to make that happen.

Yeah I was joking...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/375836https://brownsboard.com/post/375836Tue, 31 Dec 2013 22:04:30 GMT