<![CDATA[Texans to take Clowney?]]>Seem the owner is high on him. Is he Jerry jones enough to override everyone? And how scary would it be with Clowney one side and JJ Watt the other?!

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfl-draft-scout/24409092/nfl-draft-texans-mcnair-envisions-clowneywatt-tandem

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/28203/texans-to-take-clowneyRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 01:38:42 GMTWed, 15 Jan 2014 13:27:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:29:39 GMT]]>Texans run the 3-4 right? WOuld be interesting to know where they feel Clowney would fit best. As the other 3-4 DE opposite Watt or as the Hybrid? I'd put him in the Hybrid cause he's athletic enough and we all know he can up and put his hand in the dirt.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379707https://brownsboard.com/post/379707Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:29:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:48:52 GMT]]>

@miktoxic said:

kiper has whiffed on so many picks, the wind from all those whiffs has made his hair gel turn into plastic.

He promised to quit if he was wrong about Jimmy Claussen. Damn liar.]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379678https://brownsboard.com/post/379678Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:48:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:09:52 GMT]]>Maybe it's Kiper's year... I mean... I agree with him (sort of) so he has that going for him... 🙂

@the-gipper said:

Or, perhaps, they are enamored enough with Case Keesum to give him the starting job.......and that their evaluation of this year's QB crop is subdued.

Is it possible that they may think that Bridgewater/Manziel/Bortles etc. would not be an upgrade over either Keesum or Schaub?

That's be Case Keenum and no, they are not that enamored by him... or Schaub... or TJ Yates...

I think they really want Manziel, but (as I said above) not at #1.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379660https://brownsboard.com/post/379660Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:09:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:45:13 GMT]]>kiper has whiffed on so many picks, the wind from all those whiffs has made his hair gel turn into plastic.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379652https://brownsboard.com/post/379652Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:45:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:39:09 GMT]]>

@hx214 said:

Well if Kiper says Manziel is going No. 1, that pretty much seals it that he will fall to us at 4.

Kiper?

Shucks we should be able to wait until the second round! WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379648https://brownsboard.com/post/379648Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:39:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:30:40 GMT]]>Well if Kiper says Manziel is going No. 1, that pretty much seals it that he will fall to us at 4.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379645https://brownsboard.com/post/379645Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:30:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:21:03 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

Maybe they could see Carr as an option and try to trade up in to the first to take him.

I bet hell will freeze over before they take another Carr.

The Rams will probably try and trade down a few picks too so someone else could grab a QB if they think Jake Matthews will still drop to them.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379636https://brownsboard.com/post/379636Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:21:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:08:14 GMT]]>Johnny Manziel No. 1 overall? That's what @MelKiperESPN says in his 1st Mock Draft of 2014: http://es.pn/1aGkC6V pic.twitter.com/trEQILDbdz

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379631https://brownsboard.com/post/379631Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:08:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:06:09 GMT]]>Maybe they could see Carr as an option and try to trade up in to the first to take him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379630https://brownsboard.com/post/379630Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:06:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:18:01 GMT]]>

@sadbrownsfan said:

I could see them taking Clowney if they felt that Schaub could bounce back. Before his melt down this year he was a decent QB.

Or, perhaps, they are enamored enough with Case Keesum to give him the starting job.......and that their evaluation of this year's QB crop is subdued.

Is it possible that they may think that Bridgewater/Manziel/Bortles etc. would not be an upgrade over either Keesum or Schaub?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379614https://brownsboard.com/post/379614Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:18:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:01:25 GMT]]>They should, he's the best player in the draft

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379571https://brownsboard.com/post/379571Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:01:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:58:14 GMT]]>While it could be scary as hell, and opposite JJ I would have zero motivational concerns for Clowney (JJ would kick his ass if he loafed), I can't see the Texans passing on a QB... and I think the one they want is Manziel.

So the trick for them is how do they trade down and still get their guy?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379570https://brownsboard.com/post/379570Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:58:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:40:23 GMT]]>I could see them taking Clowney if they felt that Schaub could bounce back. Before his melt down this year he was a decent QB.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379566https://brownsboard.com/post/379566Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:40:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Texans to take Clowney? on Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:28:17 GMT]]>Which, I forgot to add, would make that number 2 spot quite attractive for teams looking to get Teddy B.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/379563https://brownsboard.com/post/379563Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:28:17 GMT