<![CDATA[Records since the Expansion (02-13)]]>Non of the teams who have one the Super Bowl in this time have a losing record. Make your own observation. Side note: Sucks for the Chargers. Only Top 5 team without a ring in that time. 16iEDNI.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/28429/records-since-the-expansion-02-13RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 12:15:44 GMTMon, 10 Feb 2014 18:30:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Records since the Expansion (02-13) on Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:43:33 GMT]]>Maybe not. Don't concentrate on the teams behind us. Look at the number of crap teams ahead of us.

Where's the Alka-Seltzer?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/385687https://brownsboard.com/post/385687Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:43:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Records since the Expansion (02-13) on Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:28:37 GMT]]>

@hunt-daddy said:

I wouldn't trust this entirely. We haven't tied a game since 2002 and Detroit won 10 games in 2011.

The correct browns record is 65-127. Pretty close to 65-126-1.

I know Detroit has sucked hard but idk their actual numbers. We had a 9 win season in 2002 and a 10 win season in 2007.

Edit:

I believe Detroit's actual is 58-134. So the graph is off but at least we aren't last.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/385667https://brownsboard.com/post/385667Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:28:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Records since the Expansion (02-13) on Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:00:11 GMT]]>I wouldn't trust this entirely. We haven't tied a game since 2002 and Detroit won 10 games in 2011.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/385665https://brownsboard.com/post/385665Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:00:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Records since the Expansion (02-13) on Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:30:27 GMT]]>By expansion you mean since the league went to 32 teams n'est ce pas?

OK, guess what I see: The teams with the really good QBs win. Pats/Brady, Colts/Manning, Packers Favre/Rodgers etc.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/385612https://brownsboard.com/post/385612Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:30:27 GMT