@mld-woody said:

Unless they are from Lakewood.

@erie-dawg said:

What facts do I need to dispute? Where do you think you are winning this argument?

You said homosexuals are more messed up in the head and more likely to torture children. But you have yet to show any evidence for that (even though you seem to think you have).

A gay person being more prone to depression because people like you, Stewy, DieHard and Cal exist does not make them more likely to torture kids...

Got it?

If there are more conservatives than liberals, and if Obama is so bad, maybe you all should have come out to vote. Or just don't isolate yourselves from those in the middle ground when it comes to social issues.

Do you really think gays will never be able to get married? Do you really think they will always be discriminated against? That is laughable. Times will change, they already are. It is just a matter of time. Outdated, old ideas die will start to die with the old holders of those ideas.

Just like all those blacks and women that are still second class citizens, right? No voting or anything for them. That will never change.

You think you put me in trouble? Hahaha, cute. You are a funny, stupid, little man

@mld-woody said:

Stupidity is a bad thing and it is a choice, generally.

If stupidity was a choice then why do you always choose it? The irony of your statement proves you're stupid. Being stupid is what you are, it's not a choice. Stupidity is what the democrat party thrives upon...stupidity is why we have Obama.

@mld-woody said:

Also, calling something gay really doesn't mean homosexual anymore. Just like Retard really doesn't mean mentally challenged. I try to avoid using either though.

What a surprise...the lefts changing the definintions of words to suit their agenda.

You've already changed the meaning of "gay" once...it used to mean "happy".

So whats "Retard" supposed to mean now?

Very well then, don't get so butthurt the next time someone calls you a gay Retard....it's not what they really mean.

@mld-woody said:

When it comes to this do I think I am better than you because I am not a homophobe lashing out at anything gay because I am desperately trying to suppress my sexuality from deep in the closet? Yeah, I do.

You think you are better than the everyone else regardless...that is the mindset of any self righteous "we know best" snot nosed liberal elitist.

@mld-woody said:

The only silver lining to threads like this and conversations like this is that your side will be nothing more than the deepest darkest parts of the Deep South in a decade or so.

"Your side" as in conservatives? Conservatives clearly outnumber libtards, and it's gonna take a lot longer than 10 years before liberal stupidy becomes the majority.

This is not to absolve Conservatives from being stupid. If every Conservative came out to vote instead of staying home just because Romney wasn't their guy, then Obama would have lost in a landslide. Again, stupididty is dangerous.

The liberal control of the mainstream media, academia, and Hollywood must give you the illusion that libtards have greater numbers. Wise up woody.

You should go back to keeping your posts short and simpleton like...you'll find yourself in a lot less trouble.

@mld-woody said:

Yes, if you are an idiot, I will call you one. Shocker, you are an idiot.

I do not believe insulting a gay person or using homosexuality as an insult is on the same level. Stupidity is a bad thing and it is a choice, generally. Homosexuality is not a bad thing and it is not a choice. Your line of insults continue the discrimination against this group of people

Also, calling something gay really doesn't mean homosexual anymore. Just like Retard really doesn't mean mentally challenged. I try to avoid using either though.

When it comes to this do I think I am better than you because I am not a homophobe lashing out at anything gay because I am desperately trying to suppress my sexuality from deep in the closet? Yeah, I do.

It isn't "the rest of us". It is anyone ignorant enough to be so anti gay.

The only silver lining to threads like this and conversations like this is that your side will be nothing more than the deepest darkest parts of the Deep South in a decade or so.

@erie-dawg said:

Yes, if you are an idiot, I will call you one. Shocker, you are an idiot.

I do not believe insulting a gay person or using homosexuality as an insult is on the same level. Stupidity is a bad thing and it is a choice, generally. Homosexuality is not a bad thing and it is not a choice. Your line of insults continue the discrimination against this group of people

Also, calling something gay really doesn't mean homosexual anymore. Just like Retard really doesn't mean mentally challenged. I try to avoid using either though.

When it comes to this do I think I am better than you because I am not a homophobe lashing out at anything gay because I am desperately trying to suppress my sexuality from deep in the closet? Yeah, I do.

It isn't "the rest of us". It is anyone ignorant enough to be so anti gay.

The only silver lining to threads like this and conversations like this is that your side will be nothing more than the deepest darkest parts of the Deep South in a decade or so.

@mld-woody said:

Gay people have a higher chance of suffering from anxiety and depressing because they are discriminated against by people like some we have here. Shocker

So somehow you are better than the rest of us... even though you call people Retarded, dump, stupid, idiot etc, than others that call shit gay or eachother queers?

Typical.

I look forward to your usual nonsensical drivel.

@osiris said:

Do you actually read what you post? That article lists a bunch of fairly common mental issues that are typically found in all populations that face discrimination on a routine basis. None of those are the sort of mental disorders that typically lead to torturing children.

@gidget said:

I think everyone agrees that what happened to those children is horrible. What's sad is the OP decided with his wording of the subject to make this to be about two lesbians instead of the children. I agree, who cares what their sexual preference is, it is irrelevant, but the OP is trying to make it relevant.

I'm sure they'll get what the deserve in prison.

@erie-dawg said:

umm yeah they are, and its a fairly easy search if you take the couple seconds to look.

Here is just 1 of many http://psychcentral.com/lib/higher-risk-of-mental-health-problems-for-homosexuals/0006527

Do you actually read what you post? That article lists a bunch of fairly common mental issues that are typically found in all populations that face discrimination on a routine basis. None of those are the sort of mental disorders that typically lead to torturing children.

@logicisforsquares said:

I can tell you at least 10 stories off hand of kids I had to deal with who were tortured by their parents. Not spanked. Like chained and raped. Kept in dog cages. The parents were straight and married in every case. If I wanted to sit down I know I could remember more.

again thats not what I was saying, not sure why you keep bringing it up?

Gay people are no more likely to be mental than any one else.

Here is just 1 of many http://psychcentral.com/lib/higher-risk-of-mental-health-problems-for-homosexuals/0006527

THEY EAT THE POO POO!

@the-cysko-kid said:

Never really crossed my mind. Apparently they are riveting subjects over at narth.org.

Only one of the links you put up wasn't either a) a link from a weird anti-gay site (it had a damn link about the dangers of fisting) linked to short incomplete studies that got mangled by the rest of the psych community.

The one that wasn't total horse shit just said that gays are slightly more prone to "non-pathological mental illness" like depression and anxiety.

Don't recall any of the research saying they are slightly more prone to torturing kids.

@logicisforsquares said:

You should try Google first before making such claims.

http://www.narth.org/docs/whitehead.html

http://psychcentral.com/lib/higher-risk-of-mental-health-problems-for-homosexuals/0006527

http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb02/newdata.aspx

http://www.nami.org/TextTemplate.cfm?Section=Fact_Sheets1&ContentID=54036