<![CDATA[Only one "fair and balanced"]]>http://journalism.org/

Apparently so.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/294/only-one-fair-and-balancedRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 00:54:51 GMTSat, 01 Nov 2008 16:54:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Only one "fair and balanced" on Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:39:58 GMT]]>

\ said:

\ said:

\ said:

I think you posted the wrong article. This one says CNN falls in between Fox and MSNBC.

Yes.

To the left of Fox which is surprisingly in the center.

WSS

No sir thanks for trying.

So you looked at the balace of negative to positive coverage and came to that conclusion?

Or just reverting to the "did not" "did too" format?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/3430https://brownsboard.com/post/3430Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:39:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Only one "fair and balanced" on Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:35:37 GMT]]>theonion.com ?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/3427https://brownsboard.com/post/3427Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:35:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Only one "fair and balanced" on Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:29:24 GMT]]>

\ said:

\ said:

I think you posted the wrong article. This one says CNN falls in between Fox and MSNBC.

Yes.

To the left of Fox which is surprisingly in the center.

WSS

No sir thanks for trying.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/3306https://brownsboard.com/post/3306Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:29:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Only one "fair and balanced" on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:43:05 GMT]]>

\ said:

I think you posted the wrong article. This one says CNN falls in between Fox and MSNBC.

Yes.

To the left of Fox which is surprisingly in the center.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/3277https://brownsboard.com/post/3277Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:43:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Only one "fair and balanced" on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:24:23 GMT]]>

\ said:

CNN, like I've been saying.

Is only slightly less slanted than MSNBC.

Sorry.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/3271https://brownsboard.com/post/3271Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:24:23 GMT