<![CDATA[I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time....]]>Is anybody else noticing that Armonty Bryant is STUD? I kind of don't want him to come out of games.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/29974/i-almost-think-we-should-switch-to-a-4-3-full-time....RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:02:15 GMTTue, 19 Aug 2014 20:12:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Thu, 21 Aug 2014 02:16:40 GMT]]>As long as we have 11 guys playing defense I'll be happy.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/427046https://brownsboard.com/post/427046Thu, 21 Aug 2014 02:16:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Thu, 21 Aug 2014 02:06:09 GMT]]>So....why does it matter so much if...for example.....sheard is rushing from a three point versus standing up?

The same play can be called either way....so does it really matter if its 3-4/4-3 if 4 are rushing either way?

Point being....this D will utilize players strengths. If AB and sheard prefer being down, O'Neil will play them as such. To illustrate the point, mingo is playing over sheard basically due to his coverage.....he's more well rounded and at least has a chance to stay with a back...maybe a weaker pass rusher. Sheard can't cover.

This league is boiling down to how well a coach can read his players and put them in a position to succeed.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/427039https://brownsboard.com/post/427039Thu, 21 Aug 2014 02:06:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:47:20 GMT]]>I think we already are. Isn't the difference how many guys start the snap in a 3 point stance at the LOS? I'd have to rewatch some of it to say for sure, but l just don't remember too many plays where there's just 3 guys doing that.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/427010https://brownsboard.com/post/427010Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:47:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:57:47 GMT]]>One of my favorite themes...

After Shurmur/ Jauron took us to a 4-3 with a 3-4 roster, we assembled a 4-3 roster just in time for Chud/ Horton to force fit us back into and 3-4.

While we are closer to a legit 3-4 roster now, I thought for sure that in Pettine's "fit the system to the personnel" hybrid that we'd run a lot more 4-3...

Maybe we will...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/427004https://brownsboard.com/post/427004Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:57:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:28:06 GMT]]>I forgot about something, if it weren't for #95, Morris would have been in for that touchdown on the goal line.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/426618https://brownsboard.com/post/426618Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:28:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:23:36 GMT]]>Yes I should have clarified....when Armonty's in the game we're running 4-3 looks. He's better with his hands in the dirt than kruger and sheard combined.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/426441https://brownsboard.com/post/426441Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:23:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I almost think we should switch to a 4-3 full time.... on Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:13:49 GMT]]>What the hell does that have to do with the thread title?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/426432https://brownsboard.com/post/426432Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:13:49 GMT