<![CDATA[Gordon Coming Back?]]>There's a vote today apparently on the new drug policies, which in turn will dictate whether Josh Gordon (and Wes Welker, post concussion) will be reinstated. Not sure when the results will be known - you'd think if the suspensions are overturned, it would be with immediate effect, so Gordon could train tomorrow.

Now, *that* would be an exciting offense, the way we ran the ball, the way Hawkins was making catches, less pressure on Miles Austin to be *the* guy, less pressue on Gabriel to produce immediately. RBs running the way they were, and defense playing like they did in the second half...could be fun times!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/30209/gordon-coming-backRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 05:27:48 GMTTue, 09 Sep 2014 15:33:47 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:37:47 GMT]]>I feel pretty confidant josh ' s suspension is going to stand. The best thing he can do is stay in cleveland. Hang out with his teammates. Get his life straightened out and come back stronger than ever next year. Week one proved we don't need any one player to beat the steelers or anyone else.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432265https://brownsboard.com/post/432265Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:37:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:52:21 GMT]]>Poetic you make me not like him with these stupid fucking videos.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432260https://brownsboard.com/post/432260Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:52:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:50:58 GMT]]>

Some good stuff in there, hope you all enjoy.

#FreeJoshGordon

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432259https://brownsboard.com/post/432259Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:50:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:50:03 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432258https://brownsboard.com/post/432258Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:50:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:49:13 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432257https://brownsboard.com/post/432257Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:49:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:48:34 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432256https://brownsboard.com/post/432256Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:48:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:48:12 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432255https://brownsboard.com/post/432255Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:48:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:44:09 GMT]]>The league needs to get off the Ray Rice crap, so they can pass these new SA Policy rules and get Gordon back on the field!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432252https://brownsboard.com/post/432252Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:44:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:45:23 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

I love it! So let me ask you this......notwithstanding the ambient smoke that drifts off the joint or pipe, what % of the original the THC that was inhaled and then exhaled would you think comes out to be re-inhaled? And then, of all the smoke, ambient and exhaled, what % does ambient represent?

How far are you going to shift the argument?

Its possible.....you said it wasn't. Now please put the keyboard down. You're what's wrong with steelers fans. To prideful to admit being wrong.

As far as percentages, that's a terrible question when talking about atoms. Ever heard of avagadros number? Of course you haven't. Too busy trying to sound smart that actually to be smart. There's still 21 significant digits left when you numerate the ℅.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432251https://brownsboard.com/post/432251Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:45:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:39:20 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

I love it! So let me ask you this......notwithstanding the ambient smoke that drifts off the joint or pipe, what % of the original the THC that was inhaled and then exhaled would you think comes out to be re-inhaled? And then, of all the smoke, ambient and exhaled, what % does ambient represent?

I thought I could "block" people? I'm sick of this idiot running his mouth...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432250https://brownsboard.com/post/432250Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:39:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:36:06 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

I love it! So let me ask you this......notwithstanding the ambient smoke that drifts off the joint or pipe, what % of the original the THC that was inhaled and then exhaled would you think comes out to be re-inhaled? And then, of all the smoke, ambient and exhaled, what % does ambient represent?

Honestly, I have no clue. It probably depends on a lot of things. A joint/blunt puts off LOTS of smoke because it's always burning. A bong or pipe puts most of the smoke straight into your lungs. Are we in a big room or a small room..

But, I would guess under the right conditions, a big phat blunt or 2 burned in a car with the windows closed would do the trick...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432249https://brownsboard.com/post/432249Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:36:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:08:41 GMT]]>Please dont attack me if your a peta person or animal lover. Im just relating the story. My Mom and my wife both work in the same place(which will remain anonymous) and they do medical testing on lots of animals. Right now, they have a pregnant goat and are testing her for a long list of things, including how cig smoke effects a fetus and the addictiveness of pot. The goat is in a plastic tent and smoke is administered threw a tube and blown into the inside air. The goat can also "activate" the smoke(pot or ciggy) by pressing the proper pedal and getting more smoke. And I promise, the goat likes it all. Pretty much pedal to the metal....

So, from this I can assume that the medical experts think "second hand" or "ambient" smoke is good enough for medical testing. And that thje goat is getting her Nicotine and THC from second hand smoke....

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432223https://brownsboard.com/post/432223Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:08:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:20:16 GMT]]>

@jcam222 said:

So I did a littler homework and to me it seems as though the heat has much more of a function than simply vaporizing per Choco's comment. I could be wrong but I see the following as the purpose:

Correct....good call. So I did some digging myself. Sparing the details, THCa shows up in tests anyhow, and decarbonization would be complete in second hand smoke. So in regards to josh, it only helps the story.

Decarbonization was interesting reading. The rate is increased by heat, so I swung and missed there for sure ...at least on the requirement for heat. Yet the body can process THCa into THC given enough time. Which actually explains some things for me about those years of school...

So good for the nozzle....he got one detail right....

Anyway....what will truly test rog's sak is if he has the balls to continue the suspension for any reason. DUI is another issue. So under the new proposition, there would be no failed test, as the 50ng threshold would not have been exceeded. The argument of contention. Which heavily depends on the wording is that josh's "failure" was in December of 2013, so some have concluded some language could effect josh and not others. Hence this'll test goodells metal....if he hardliners against only josh, his already battered image will be under fire once again by those with an Axe to grind.

Now, if the NFLPA agrees to let goodell levy suspensions for DUI before the trial, then josh is still fucked.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432212https://brownsboard.com/post/432212Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:20:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:45:56 GMT]]>

@mudfly said:

Well, finally a subject I know all about.....haha....sad, but true....

1) You misinterpreted the High Times article you read. You DEFINITELY get high from eating pot, even if it's raw pot. Positively absolutely very very high. And it is a different type of high, due to the way your body processes it. It also stays detectable in your system MUCH longer because it is attached to fat cells(ONLY because of the digestive process)....but this "attachment" has nothing to do with how one gets high and it is just residual byproduct of what you've eaten....

2) So, the fat cells(in your body) have nothing to do with ANY of this or how your body absorbs pot. The FAT comments were there to suggest the best way to eat pot is to concentrate and bind it with fat for ingestion....which is to make a concentrated extraction called butter/paste/oil(all the same thing basically) and mix it with a fat(cream, butter, etc) that will be dissolved "better and faster" by your digestive system when eaten and prevent the THC from vaporizing during the heating process

3) HEAT or solvents(90 % alcohol is the safest and works best) are used to extract the CB's and THC from the pot to make the concentrated paste/butter. Most often solvents are used, as too much heat can ruin the product if not properly controlled.

4) And making brownies with straight up organic weed WILL get you very high....but weed really doesnt taste good and, if it's not broken down onto a concentrate, it takes a lot more of it to get you high....which, again, makes your brownies not as good tasting......so, stoners who want the best buzz and best tasting brownies use cannabis oil to cook....rookies use straight up weed

Id also add that "ingested" pot will stay in your system at much higher levels for much longer periods of time(cause of the fat cell thing)...

shit. i might have to print this out.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432209https://brownsboard.com/post/432209Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:45:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:28:42 GMT]]>yeah, I guess you're right. You're in a far better position to audit my life experiences. lol, I'm done feeding the troll.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432206https://brownsboard.com/post/432206Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:28:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:21:51 GMT]]> Rumor: Josh Gordon says that he will play on Sunday for Cleveland Browns

http://network.yardbarker.com/nfl/article_external/rumor_josh_gordon_says_that_he_will_play_on_sunday_for_cleveland_browns/17249690

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432203https://brownsboard.com/post/432203Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:21:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:02:14 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

This is exactly the kind of stuff I come here for, you guys actually believe this stuff 😳

it's just observable science, I've been exposed to a lot of steeler fans and have witnessed them foaming at the mouth at any call against their team.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432201https://brownsboard.com/post/432201Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:02:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:45:55 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

Those are "your opinions" ...... I am not lobbying for different tolerances or Josh Gordon's punishment, all I am asking is if I can expect the typical whining and boo-hooing if his suspension is upheld? When a typical Browns fan goes out in the rain he gets wet because God hates Browns fans. When the Browns lose it's because the refs screwed them, the other team cheated, the NFL hates them, this guy missed that play, and that guy missed this play....why isn't it ever simply because they are what their record says they are?

....this is a bald-face troll, Steeler fans cry harder than any other fan base about the refs.

We all complain about the refs as they are only human and bound to make mistakes, but yinzers seemingly take pleasure in elevating their bellyaching to vaudevillian levels.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432197https://brownsboard.com/post/432197Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:45:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:39:13 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

And Gluehead renders his drivel. The list of Josh Gordons violation of rules at every level of his football career is as long as your imagination. He's in stage 3 for a reason gluehead!

But he's already been penalized for everything but the DUI. You're just not a smart man.

Zombo

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432194https://brownsboard.com/post/432194Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:39:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:31:54 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

And what would this "body of work" consist of? Driving with .001 too much alcohol, for which he hasn't had a hearing yet?

Actually the NFL would owe him for a game check, unless they want to count that first week for the DUI arrest, and then suspend him again later for two games if he is convicted.

Zombo

I think one of the things being put into the new policy is 2 games for your first dui offense. So I would assume if he is found quilty for the DUI, and he is reinstated to play this week, then he would only have to serve 1 game later in the season.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432192https://brownsboard.com/post/432192Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:31:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:27:05 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

Are you guys prepared for the possibility that Gordon doesn't come back simply because of his host of violations? Regardless of the threshold for pot being changed the league may look at Gordons body of work and maintain his suspension?

And what would this "body of work" consist of? Driving with .001 too much alcohol, for which he hasn't had a hearing yet?

Actually the NFL would owe him for a game check, unless they want to count that first week for the DUI arrest, and then suspend him again later for two games if he is convicted.

Zombo

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432177https://brownsboard.com/post/432177Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:27:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:15:29 GMT]]>

@douche-nozzle said:

To be technically correct, yes the chances decrease, but I'm not too worried about 99% decreasing to 97%.

But if the NFL upholds his suspension due to his repetition, are you prepared to deal with it or are you preparing your "the NFL hates US"....."we got screwed" speeches?

It's like this guy- two of those strikes- phenergan, and a trace, and I do mean trace of THC are bullshit, and you know it.

BTW, Josh sold his first car yesterday.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432173https://brownsboard.com/post/432173Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:15:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:07:41 GMT]]>

@jafbf said:

Along the lines of this :

Last update was it's back to the Lawyers to iron out some things and they hope to vote tonight.

I think I saw one sticking point was the DUI provisions/punishments.

That was my guess, also.... Goodell set the precedent by letting the Irsay case play out in court- and the players have got him by the you know what over that point. And it wasn't just weed in Irsay's case- it was controlled substances- not sure if he had coke in the car, but I do know with $20,000 in cash on him, he wasn't going down to the local supermarket to pick up groceries for dinner that night.

@tour2ma said:

I heard owners had put in proposal that called for suspending players prior to adjudication of DUI's. Big change from the current "let the legal process play out" stance.

I wonder if it was meant to be a Poison Pill.

Hopefully, they drop that, and make it a 2 game suspension on conviction.

@douche-nozzle said:

Are you guys prepared for the possibility that Gordon doesn't come back simply because of his host of violations? Regardless of the threshold for pot being changed the league may look at Gordons body of work and maintain his suspension?

I suppose you could get your hopes up "for conduct detrimental to the image of the league". However, nothing substantive until Josh's DUI hearing- in November.

I mean really- they're letting that ex-Cowboy back in- and he not only had a DUI, he killed the passenger in his car- vehicular homicide. Ditto Donte Stallworth after he took out a pedestrian DUI.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432170https://brownsboard.com/post/432170Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:07:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gordon Coming Back? on Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:48:42 GMT]]>

@roycerolls said:

Everyone responds differently, some people can smoke all day long and others are writing encrypted messages to captain crunch after one hit.

Just because 15 ng of THC wouldn't get you high doesn't mean that it wouldn't be in your system.

Encrypted messages to Captain Crunch! LOL! 😆 Fuckin' hillarious! I almost spit my water all over my keyboard! For me personally, some good music, or chilling outside watching nature at work does it for me. 😎 As for THC.... while it may stay in your system for up to a month depending on your metabolism, the intoxicating effects generally wear off in 1-3 hours. Sometimes longer, depending on the strain, the amount, and method of consumption. Put it this way, if I take 2 or 3 hits off of a bowl when I get home at 6:30 in the evening, there is no way in HELL you can say right now that I'm intoxicated, or that it is having any effect on me right now.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/432158https://brownsboard.com/post/432158Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:48:42 GMT