<![CDATA[ebola]]>http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5992510?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000063

For the Conservatives it's from Fox News. For the Liberals it was on the Huffington Post. It seems reasonable to me.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/30579/ebolaRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 07:19:41 GMTThu, 16 Oct 2014 12:35:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:05:06 GMT]]>Denard Robinson doesn't believe in condoms

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443287https://brownsboard.com/post/443287Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:05:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:58:29 GMT]]>Just tell your 'partner' to wear a condom before he butt fucks you Woody.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443262https://brownsboard.com/post/443262Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:58:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:22:08 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

One more time.

The cases from heterosexual sex are almost all women who made a "Retarded decision" to have unprotected sex with a bisexual or IV drug use.

So Cyskos numbers are closer if not exact.

The point is?

WSS

How do you know that?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443254https://brownsboard.com/post/443254Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:22:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:20:41 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

It's worth noting cal that every patient who was brought here from africa to be treated at a qualified facility has recovered. Only a deceitful fool who knew he has been exposed and then lied about it multiple times brought it here spread it and died. I tend to think this doctor was being responsible enough to prevent an outbreak in nyc

but Obama

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443253https://brownsboard.com/post/443253Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:20:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:34:32 GMT]]>Absolutely correct. He was careful, and very responsible. Though, I just keep thinking that ebola could come across our open

borders, per Obamao, and all heyl could break loose.

Especially with shipping the illegal sumbeeches all over the country.

We'll just have to hope we're all going to be safe here. But the odds could

turn against us.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443216https://brownsboard.com/post/443216Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:34:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:10:23 GMT]]>It's worth noting cal that every patient who was brought here from africa to be treated at a qualified facility has recovered. Only a deceitful fool who knew he has been exposed and then lied about it multiple times brought it here spread it and died. I tend to think this doctor was being responsible enough to prevent an outbreak in nyc

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443195https://brownsboard.com/post/443195Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:10:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:54:29 GMT]]>Well, it isn't the first time I've confused you two......@@

but, back to my post:

"Nothing to worry about. haha.....no reason to keep them from coming here...."

New report warns of Ebola 'explosion' in Liberia...

Predicts 171,000 cases in one county...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443188https://brownsboard.com/post/443188Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:54:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:39:15 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

Chris, you are quibbling about numbers, basically, Cysko nailed it.

Meanwhile, another obamebola case confirmed in NY......

I wasn't, Woody was. My quibble is with "this number is fact, you can't disprove it therefore I'm right"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443181https://brownsboard.com/post/443181Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:39:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:34:41 GMT]]>Chris, you are quibbling about numbers, basically, Cysko nailed it.

Meanwhile, another obamebola case confirmed in NY......

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443180https://brownsboard.com/post/443180Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:34:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:32:07 GMT]]>The point was that just saying "X% of A is B - I don't have to prove it, you prove me wrong" is about as flawed as it gets in debating.

In this case, it was just being used for emphasis, as in "the vast majority" which is fine, but declaring it to be fact until proven otherwise is wrong.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443177https://brownsboard.com/post/443177Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:32:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:17:17 GMT]]>One more time.

The cases from heterosexual sex are almost all women who made a "Retarded decision" to have unprotected sex with a bisexual or IV drug use.

So Cyskos numbers are closer if not exact.

The point is?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443175https://brownsboard.com/post/443175Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:17:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:56:23 GMT]]>If you're having unprotected sex with random people who's history is unknown yes I would certainly call that a Retarded decision.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443173https://brownsboard.com/post/443173Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:56:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:52:17 GMT]]>Then I guess it boils down to if you think having sex is a Retarded decision.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443172https://brownsboard.com/post/443172Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:52:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:49:13 GMT]]>]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443171https://brownsboard.com/post/443171Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:49:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:45:59 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

From the CDC:

Nearly two thirds of these new infections [HIV] occurred in gay and bisexual men.

So, actually some distance from 99%. It doesn't include needle sharing, but I doubt that makes up anywhere near 1/3 of cases.

22% needle sharers. The rest through straight sex which is still something you generally have control over. Note I said 99% contract it through "Retarded decisions" leaving perhaps 1% who contract it through either rape or medical buffoonery

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443170https://brownsboard.com/post/443170Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:45:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:42:03 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

I take issue with you pulling the number out of your arse and declaring it to be fact and challenging someone to prove you wrong - that's not how *anything* works. Except maybe sexual harassment cases.

But, I can see what you're trying to say and the number is sufficiently high to express your point.

I'll say this again slowly for you guys. There...is...no...data...to...support...or...deny...a...percentage...of...people...that...contracted...aids...through...means...they...have...no...control...over...Only...that...its...miniscule

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443169https://brownsboard.com/post/443169Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:42:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:37:26 GMT]]>Sorry, forgot the source:

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443153https://brownsboard.com/post/443153Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:37:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:36:31 GMT]]>From the CDC:

Nearly two thirds of these new infections [HIV] occurred in gay and bisexual men.

So, actually some distance from 99%. It doesn't include needle sharing, but I doubt that makes up anywhere near 1/3 of cases.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443152https://brownsboard.com/post/443152Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:36:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:33:44 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

You're the only person who takes issue with that number yet you haven't told me what percentage you think gets aids that doesn't stem from a Retarded decision

I take issue with you pulling the number out of your arse and declaring it to be fact and challenging someone to prove you wrong - that's not how *anything* works. Except maybe sexual harassment cases.

But, I can see what you're trying to say and the number is sufficiently high to express your point.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443151https://brownsboard.com/post/443151Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:33:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:22:38 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Not at all. You are saying its on me to prove the number you pulled out of your ass wrong. That's Retarded.

You're the only person who takes issue with that number yet you haven't told me what percentage you think gets aids that doesn't stem from a Retarded decision

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443121https://brownsboard.com/post/443121Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:22:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:10:03 GMT]]>Another possible case of obamebola:

http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-nyc-doctor-harlem-194023867.html

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/443111https://brownsboard.com/post/443111Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:10:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:33:05 GMT]]>Getting back to the OP:

We now have "president Buttock Obamola"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/442897https://brownsboard.com/post/442897Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:33:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:24:45 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

Semantics. Hurr de durr you can't talk to me like that I went to Michigan.

Not at all. You are saying its on me to prove the number you pulled out of your ass wrong. That's Retarded.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/442891https://brownsboard.com/post/442891Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:24:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ebola on Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:23:54 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

I'm sure everyone in Liberia is comforted

I'm sure they aren't.

But the hysteria isn't "oh my god! Not Africa". It's "Ebola will kill everyone you know! America I at risk! ISIS illegal Mexican carriers!"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/442889https://brownsboard.com/post/442889Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:23:54 GMT