<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Could the Oakland Raiders say Sayonara to the Bay area, and California altogether?  See this article:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/raiders/article/San-Antonio-officials-say-meeting-with-Raiders-5884613.php" rel="external nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/raiders/article/San-Antonio-officials-say-meeting-with-Raiders-5884613.php</a></p>

<p>But other articles suggest it would never happen:</p>

<p><a href="http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/11/10/report-oakland-raiders-not-moving-to-san-antonio/" rel="external nofollow">http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/11/10/report-oakland-raiders-not-moving-to-san-antonio/</a></p>

<p>But, the point is, the Raiders are looking at SA.   And for some to suggest that it could never happen may mean that those people may be ostriches.   The Raiders left Oakland once....and without a stadium they could do it again.  While LA may be a more likely location, Mark Davis is the son of Al Davis....which means unpredictabilty.</p>
<p>Just tell the people in  Baltimore who said the Colts would never move, or those in Houston who said the Oilers would never move, or those in LA who said the Rams would never move, or St. Louis who said the Cardinals would never move.  And of course we here in Cleveland.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/30881/competition-in-texas-for-texans-cowboys-s.a.-raiders</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 18:11:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/30881.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:07:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:07:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/walterwhite" aria-label="Profile: walterwhite">@<bdi>walterwhite</bdi></a> <a href="/post/448570">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>I agree, Oakland Raiders and that fan base of ex cons is classic to me. </p>


</div></blockquote>

<p>They are an iconic team and belong in Cal.  Texas is not the right place for the Raiders to land. </p>

<p>To me, that would just be <em>weird</em></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448586</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448586</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Manzier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:07:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:09:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/448563">said</a>:</p><div><p>SA is a great city, but would hate to see OAK lose the Raiders.</p></div></blockquote>

<p>I agree, Oakland Raiders and that fan base of ex cons is classic to me. </p>

<p>Just move the Rams to LA, and supposedly they are supposed to look at Inglewood? </p>

<p>Fuck, that neighborhood isn't the nicest. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448570</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448570</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[WalterWhite]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:09:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:56:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>SA is a great city, but would hate to see OAK lose the Raiders.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448563</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448563</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:56:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:37:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Rams in LA.</p>

<p>Raiders in SA   (Bay area would do fine with just the Niners there)</p>

<p>St. Louis would be the town that gets fucked again.</p>

<p>Perhaps the better bet would be to expand to LA and SA and not move teams? </p>

<p>Put the LA Dons in the NFCW and the San Antonio Stirrups (Saddles? Stallions?  Scorpions?  Matadors? Steers? Gunslingers? Bulls?</p>
<p>Silver Stars?  etc.   whatever in the AFC South with the DATs.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448554</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448554</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:37:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:24:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/448434">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>Regarding the Rams- the St Louis Metro area is certainly big enough to support an NFL franchise- but lose the Cardinals, and then the Rams? I agree the stadium isn't "state of the Art" but is that all that matters anymore? If stadium inadequacy is the only criteria the Rolling Stone Raiders are at the top of the list for moving to greener pastures. If it's lack of fan support, the Jags should have been moved out years ago. Seems they have a Browns style poison pill lease agreement.</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>My wife &amp; I went on a camping journey in October, and one of our stops we were about 70 miles from St. Louis in the Ozarks.</p>

<p>I spoke with quite a few people who were there about the proposed move of the Rams, and they said most fans around there aren't attached to the Rams at all- it's primarily a baseball town. They wouldn't want them to leave, but doubt there would be a huge outcry like there was here.</p>

<p>I did attend the Browns-Rams game in St. Louis with my son in 2007, and that dome was very quiet. They had the Browns down 14-0, and very few were rabid in the stands. The Edward Jones Dome is more like a large movie theater.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448544</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448544</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob806]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:24:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:09:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Relocating franchises is a crime. I understand the business logic in it, but it's criminal versus the fans and the city.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448461</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448461</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Italian DawgPound]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:09:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:36:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mark-o" aria-label="Profile: mark-o">@<bdi>mark-o</bdi></a> <a href="/post/448370">said</a>:</p><div><p>The Rams and Chargers or Rams and Raiders will be playing in LA within the next few years. I'm thinking Rams and Chargers are most likely</p></div></blockquote>

<p>Regarding the Rams- the St Louis Metro area is certainly big enough to support an NFL franchise- but lose the Cardinals, and then the Rams? I agree the stadium isn't "state of the Art" but is that all that matters anymore? If stadium inadequacy is the only criteria the Rolling Stone Raiders are at the top of the list for moving to greener pastures. If it's lack of fan support, the Jags should have been moved out years ago. Seems they have a Browns style poison pill lease agreement.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448434</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448434</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:36:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:05:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Rams and Chargers or Rams and Raiders will be playing in LA within the next few years. I'm thinking Rams and Chargers are most likely</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448370</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:05:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:53:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Fuck em.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448369</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DieHardBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:53:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:43:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As I noted, it seems that the itch to move an NFL team comes about every 15-20 years.   Here is the history of franchise movements as it affects most current teams. I am ignoring the fate of defunct teams, and some shenanigans that went on during WWII with the Steelers:</p>

<p>1997  Houston Oilers remove to Tennessee to eventually become Titans</p>
<p>1995  Raiders move back to Oakland from LA</p>
<p>1995  LA Rams remove to St. Louis</p>
<p>1988  St. Louis Cardinals remove to Phoenix/Ariz.</p>
<p>1984  Baltimore Colts remove to Indianapolis</p>
<p>1982  Oakland Raiders remove to Los Angeles</p>
<p>1963  Dallas Texans remove to Kansas City to become Chiefs</p>
<p>1961  LA Chargers remove to San Diego</p>
<p>1960  Chicago Cardinals remove to St. Louis</p>
<p>1946  Cleveland Rams remove to Los Angeles</p>
<p>1937  Boston Redskins remove to Washington DC</p>
<p>1934  Portsmouth Spartans remove to Detroit to become Lions</p>
<p>1921  Decatur Staleys remove to Chicago to become the Bears.</p>

<p>So?  Why does it seem that the same franchises want to move around?  We are talking about Raiders,  Rams moving. They have each moved twice already.  Chargers too.     These teams all left LA....and now they are talking about going back?</p>

<p>Why not just expand (big money for current owners)? Bring back the LA Dons  (who, fyi, actually merged with the Rams in 1950)</p>

<p>Oh, and note:  the Cleveland Browns franchise did not move.   </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448364</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:43:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Competition in Texas for Texans/Cowboys:   S.A. Raiders? on Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:31:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>And on another relocation front:   It could be possible that the Rams could move back to Los Angeles.</p>

<p><a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/20/rams-are-regarded-as-the-favorites-to-move-to-l-a/" rel="external nofollow">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/20/rams-are-regarded-as-the-favorites-to-move-to-l-a/</a></p>

<p>It seems to me that the NFL is just repeating the same fucked up pattern that they employed about 20 years ago:  threatening team movement to get better stadium deals.    They want the taxpayers to carry all the financial burden for giving them a place to do business. </p>
<p>I wish that the taxpayers would give me free office space for my business.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/448363</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/448363</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:31:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>