<![CDATA[time to start the draft talk you Blunts.]]>This is usually happening by Halloween but better late than never you faggots. Let's start this...what do you fucks think we need and who do you want? Any QB though and I nominate we chuck that guy out the window.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/31319/time-to-start-the-draft-talk-you-blunts.RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 11:42:58 GMTMon, 15 Dec 2014 02:57:16 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:46:24 GMT]]>

@unsympathetic said:

We need run defense. First round: DL and LB. Meh, if we want to go for Mariota or Winston, this is the year to try.

Second round: OL.

After that: BPA.

Good OL can be found late: just this past year, Henderson(7) for Buffalo, and Linsley(5) for GB.

Uhhh no, no it is not. There is no QB worth a first round investment, yet again. Unless some team is willing to sit Mannion for a year or so and let him work on quickening his release.

DL, WR, ILB, OL (quality depth) I got around to watching Denzel Perryman. Color me not impressed. Reminds me of Rey-rey when he was at USC.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464543https://brownsboard.com/post/464543Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:46:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:11:47 GMT]]>

@flyingfooldoug said:

Just a thought here, but why not dedicate a draft to the line of scrimmage. Now, we have no depth and marginal talent.

"Marginal talent"... let that soak in.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464526https://brownsboard.com/post/464526Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:11:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:53:21 GMT]]>We need run defense. First round: DL and LB. Meh, if we want to go for Mariota or Winston, this is the year to try.

Second round: OL.

After that: BPA.

Good OL can be found late: just this past year, Henderson(7) for Buffalo, and Linsley(5) for GB.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464482https://brownsboard.com/post/464482Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:53:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:42:05 GMT]]>

@flyingfooldoug said:

Just a thought here, but why not dedicate a draft to the line of scrimmage. That area where games are won and lost. Since 1963 I remember a few HOFers and all pros populating the line on both sides of the ball and we won a lot of games. By hook or crook the old team always had a bunch of bad assed O and D linemen. Now, we have no depth and marginal talent. Been that way since 99. Change it up and DRAFT A FUCKING LINE already! Doing the same thing over and over is just insane!

Im with you there.

I think we should go all defense and O line and just smear the field with our opponents. Then get a functional QB like Dilfer. Well only need 3 pts a week to win anyway.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464481https://brownsboard.com/post/464481Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:42:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:25:49 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

I agree 100% unfortunately, & I don't know if it's specific to Cleveland, but there is too much emphasis placed on the quarterback.

It hasn't been a successful plan since the return.

WSS

I think that's why Bermie is so nuts. Without a real good line, Browns are just spinning wheels and selling tickets. Guys like Golic and Dieken were the ones winning ballgames

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464451https://brownsboard.com/post/464451Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:25:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:20:18 GMT]]>

@flyingfooldoug said:

Just a thought here, but why not dedicate a draft to the line of scrimmage. That area where games are won and lost. Since 1963 I remember a few HOFers and all pros populating the line on both sides of the ball and we won a lot of games. By hook or crook the old team always had a bunch of bad assed O and D linemen. Now, we have no depth and marginal talent. Been that way since 99. Change it up and DRAFT A FUCKING LINE already! Doing the same thing over and over is just insane!

I agree 100% unfortunately, & I don't know if it's specific to Cleveland, but there is too much emphasis placed on the quarterback.

It hasn't been a successful plan since the return.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464447https://brownsboard.com/post/464447Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:20:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:16:07 GMT]]>Just a thought here, but why not dedicate a draft to the line of scrimmage. That area where games are won and lost. Since 1963 I remember a few HOFers and all pros populating the line on both sides of the ball and we won a lot of games. By hook or crook the old team always had a bunch of bad assed O and D linemen. Now, we have no depth and marginal talent. Been that way since 99. Change it up and DRAFT A FUCKING LINE already! Doing the same thing over and over is just insane!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464444https://brownsboard.com/post/464444Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:16:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:14:32 GMT]]>Denzel-Perryman.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464086https://brownsboard.com/post/464086Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:14:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:02:06 GMT]]>now draft talk?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/464063https://brownsboard.com/post/464063Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:02:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:18:38 GMT]]>The good news is we wont be needed RB's & CB;s for while......but ill take bpa at just about any other spot

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463990https://brownsboard.com/post/463990Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:18:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:16:17 GMT]]>After todays game... Qb, Denzel perryman, oline, dline.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463984https://brownsboard.com/post/463984Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:16:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:14:24 GMT]]>BPA in any of the front 7 positions.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463982https://brownsboard.com/post/463982Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:14:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:52:44 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

Then maybe OL, WR/TE, FB and a fucking K>

the worst fantasy GM ever.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463815https://brownsboard.com/post/463815Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:52:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sun, 21 Dec 2014 05:29:06 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

I haven't even started thinking draft. Not until we're mathematically eliminated anyways.

Well..now that has happened.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463798https://brownsboard.com/post/463798Sun, 21 Dec 2014 05:29:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sat, 20 Dec 2014 00:17:44 GMT]]>I've started seeing Landon Collins (S) as a first pick for the Browns. Like i've been saying for months. Unless we can get one of the stud OL, Landon would be a great safety-in-waiting behind Whitner.

I don't like WalterFootball's second pick (in the 1st) for us though, Sammie Coates. Awesome physical specimen, but he never been productive in college. More athlete than football player. Gametape > combine results.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463520https://brownsboard.com/post/463520Sat, 20 Dec 2014 00:17:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:10:34 GMT]]>I haven't even started thinking draft. Not until we're mathematically eliminated anyways. What is our draft stats as of right now? What is Buffalo's pick? We are around what draft slot this year? What is the best possible pick we could get at this time? After that we could start to figure out what will be available.

As of right now, I'd like a Star Linebacker. Dansby wont last forever. It's time for a MLB that will dominate in orange and brown for a long time.

Then maybe OL, WR/TE, FB and a fucking K>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463512https://brownsboard.com/post/463512Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:10:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:51:59 GMT]]>damn Avril's off the mkt. Was kind of hoping we might take a look at him as a possible FA signing next year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463502https://brownsboard.com/post/463502Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:51:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:05:33 GMT]]>

@thenew23 said:

If you don't have a franchise QB, you're looking for one...

We don't have one, so what position could possibly be more important to invest a draft pick in than QB?

Yup... I've said since day one here, you're always looking for your next QB. The only thing that impacts how hard you look/ the price you'll pay... is the performance of the QB you have.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463464https://brownsboard.com/post/463464Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:05:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:19:43 GMT]]>

@thenew23 said:

If you don't have a franchise QB, you're looking for one...

We don't have one, so what position could possibly be more important to invest a draft pick in than QB?

Just my line of thinking...

You don't go out attempting to convince yourself a player is a franchise worthy QB. That's how you end up with the Ponders, Lockers, Cassell's and Young's of the NFL.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463436https://brownsboard.com/post/463436Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:19:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:22:25 GMT]]>

@unsympathetic said:

OL

DL

ILB

in the first 2 rounds. I don't care after that.

Yes, this. This is what the Browns need right now, depth on both lines before anything else. I wouldn't mind a stud WR too once the lines are set.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463384https://brownsboard.com/post/463384Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:22:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:21:13 GMT]]>1 game is way to early to dismiss a rookie QB. I bet the Browns stick with Manziel next season (I hope, it would be nice to have consistency for once) and sign some veteran as a mentor. With Manziel and Shaw (assuming Hoyer leaves), I would rather get a veteran QB than roll the dice on another rookie. Browns can probably sign Sexy Rexy for cheap and let him teach Johnny Shanahan's playbook.

YRRGS.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463383https://brownsboard.com/post/463383Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:21:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:46:25 GMT]]>

@roycerolls said:

I'm not a big fan of the idea of using yet another draft pick on a QB, but Hundley in the 3rd would be too good to pass up.

If you don't have a franchise QB, you're looking for one...

We don't have one, so what position could possibly be more important to invest a draft pick in than QB?

Just my line of thinking...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463378https://brownsboard.com/post/463378Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:46:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:47:49 GMT]]>

@thenew23 said:

I don't mean an early pick, but what about if Hundley fell to the 3rd, or Petty or Prescott...

How about Grayson, Carden, Fajardo, or Mannion with a mid-round pick... hell we have 2 4th round picks...

I think we'd be idiots not to bring in both a FA vet backup/fringe starter AND spend a pick on a guy who has talent as well...

I'm not a big fan of the idea of using yet another draft pick on a QB, but Hundley in the 3rd would be too good to pass up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463338https://brownsboard.com/post/463338Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:47:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to time to start the draft talk you Blunts. on Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:04:46 GMT]]>

@diehardbrownsfan said:

Imagine the media blitz with RG3 and JFF? No thanks.

What's one more ring when you are already under the big top.]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463263https://brownsboard.com/post/463263Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:04:46 GMT