<![CDATA[Early Pro Bowl Results]]>Early Pro Bowl results

post-28747-0-61278200-1418866165_thumb.png

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/31361/early-pro-bowl-resultsRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 01:56:31 GMTThu, 18 Dec 2014 01:30:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:41:43 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

I'm pretty sure he didn't even do that. I thought Lanning did it last Sunday? Maybe not. I would remember better probably except we only had 1 kickoff.

Pretty funny how, a week ago, the kicker was all the rage.....and now?.....not so much....until JFF finally get's us into range.....

I feel for our new kicker(in advance) if he misses THAT opportunity....

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463376https://brownsboard.com/post/463376Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:41:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:28:59 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

We signed a new guy, right? He must have had the kickoff and that's about it - how did he do?!!!!

I'm pretty sure he didn't even do that. I thought Lanning did it last Sunday? Maybe not. I would remember better probably except we only had 1 kickoff.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463374https://brownsboard.com/post/463374Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:28:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:08:22 GMT]]>

@lbc-mike said:

Lanning is a good punter. Can't say much about our kicker

We signed a new guy, right? He must have had the kickoff and that's about it - how did he do?!!!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463372https://brownsboard.com/post/463372Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:08:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:21:27 GMT]]>Lanning is a good punter. Can't say much about our kicker

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463363https://brownsboard.com/post/463363Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:21:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:07:27 GMT]]>Tashaun deserves it

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463332https://brownsboard.com/post/463332Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:07:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:08:47 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

No he hasn't. The last few weeks maybe, but the rest of the season he looked as good as ever.

SO the last few weeks don't count?

That's when the team took a nose dive

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463316https://brownsboard.com/post/463316Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:08:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:59:01 GMT]]>

@browns149 said:

Are the rest of the LT's that bad?

Joe Thomas is coasting on his rep. He has played well below his previous seasions

No he hasn't. The last few weeks maybe, but the rest of the season he looked as good as ever.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463313https://brownsboard.com/post/463313Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:59:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:28:20 GMT]]>Are the rest of the LT's that bad?

Joe Thomas is coasting on his rep. He has played well below his previous seasions

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463299https://brownsboard.com/post/463299Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:28:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:36:50 GMT]]>

@diehardbrownsfan said:

Bladder dudes? Will they piss all over the Defense?

Bladder???

This kind of takes me back to the 4th qtr of last weeks game. There was only a minute or so left and I was thinking "is there still time???"

But then I peed my pants.

So, the answer was no.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463196https://brownsboard.com/post/463196Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:36:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:08:33 GMT]]>Bladder dudes? Will they piss all over the Defense?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463185https://brownsboard.com/post/463185Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:08:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:41:35 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Some typos are funnier than others.

Yeah, I nearly wet myself laughing...😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463173https://brownsboard.com/post/463173Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:41:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:37:53 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

3 pro bowlers on the Oline once we get Mack back? I ain't worried for us just need bladder dudes on the right side and depth.

Some typos are funnier than others.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463171https://brownsboard.com/post/463171Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:37:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:21:51 GMT]]>

@alporcini said:

Love to see the early polls.

But if/when/assuming Joe makes it, a lot of it is resting on his laurels.

He's great, but he's been schooled this season... too many times.

Trust me, I'm not a hater. Would love to see JT as Brown for life, but this year has certainly not been his best.

I think his year was one of his best until recently. The whole unit has fell off though, who dya blame

He's an automatic for the pro bowl of course though, and for the most part played like he deserves it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463161https://brownsboard.com/post/463161Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:21:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:56:15 GMT]]>Love to see the early polls.

But if/when/assuming Joe makes it, a lot of it is resting on his laurels.

He's great, but he's been schooled this season... too many times.

Trust me, I'm not a hater. Would love to see JT as Brown for life, but this year has certainly not been his best.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463056https://brownsboard.com/post/463056Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:56:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:21:26 GMT]]>

@manzier said:

Those are Not really "pro bowl" results.....these are just the results from the "fan voting".....BIG DIFFERENCE

That's right, failed to mention that when I said "early results" - still, I like what I see.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463007https://brownsboard.com/post/463007Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:21:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:20:31 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

Also tour mentioned bitonio has regressed from his early pro bowl level steadily since Mack went down. Maybe wear and tear. Good to see he got props too though.

3 pro bowlers on the Oline once we get Mack back? I ain't worried for us just need bladder dudes on the right side and depth.

Pretty standard football philosophy is that a team is only as good as their O Lines and D Lines. Having coached, I know that's true. Doesn't it seem that ALL teams these days are dealing more with key injuries? Seems like if the Browns, for example, had not ONE injury, they'd still be cruisin. Gotta expect some though.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463005https://brownsboard.com/post/463005Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:20:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:18:23 GMT]]>Those are Not really "pro bowl" results.....these are just the results from the "fan voting".....BIG DIFFERENCE

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463004https://brownsboard.com/post/463004Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:18:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:11:46 GMT]]>Also tour mentioned bitonio has regressed from his early pro bowl level steadily since Mack went down. Maybe wear and tear. Good to see he got props too though.

3 pro bowlers on the Oline once we get Mack back? I ain't worried for us just need bladder dudes on the right side and depth.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/463002https://brownsboard.com/post/463002Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:11:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:04:41 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

Nice, a good post. Why so many Cleveland guys? Lanning isn't even that good.

Those are the votes - not sure how to answer your question. I was kind of surprised at Lanning too. Bademosi? Kind of makes sense.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/462998https://brownsboard.com/post/462998Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:04:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Early Pro Bowl Results on Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:36:09 GMT]]>Nice, a good post. Why so many Cleveland guys? Lanning isn't even that good.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/462994https://brownsboard.com/post/462994Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:36:09 GMT