<![CDATA[Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw]]>MIT. A far more legit choice of engineering college, methinks...

Of course, Bernie Sanders, the socialist, wants mmgw to

be the official position...

it's all about the money, for re-distribution of all the wealth that everybody has.

socialism.

https://screen.yahoo.com/videos-for-you/top-mit-climate-scientist-senate-155650699.html
Top MIT Climate Scientist: ‘Senate’s Climate Change Vote Is Ludicrous’
by Wochit 1:00 mins
MIT climate scientist Richard Lindzen slammed this week’s amendment introduced by Vermont socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders that would make it the official position of the Senate that man-made global warming is real and a threat. Lindzen said Sanders’s amendment to a bill that approves the Keystone XL pipeline an “attempt to hijack science for political purposes.” “Climate change is of course real; change being the normal state of affairs in climate,” Lindzen told Climate Depot. “Climate change has caused catastrophic problems on occasion throughout the earth’s history. While man may have contributed somewhat to climate change in recent years, his contribution to the above is highly questionable, and continues to be debated.” “In the case of Bernie Sanders, a socialist, he is undoubtedly dreaming about nationalizing the energy industry,” Lindzen said. “For the U.S. Senate to accept guidance from Sanders’ bizarre dreams is ludicrous.”
]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/31677/top-mit-climate-scientist-disses-bernie-sanders-position-on-mmgwRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 03:56:48 GMTThu, 15 Jan 2015 19:18:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:54:04 GMT]]>My point was about the hypocrisy of the activists, Chris.

That's all. There, I just gave you a quack to the head with my

Duck Dynasty Uncle Si duck call special.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472530https://brownsboard.com/post/472530Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:54:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:48:52 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Oh hey, I was just about to type what Chris basically did, refreshed it first, and BOOM

oh, and I agree with Heck

🥷

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472526https://brownsboard.com/post/472526Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:48:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:45:38 GMT]]>Man Made Climate Change, a scientific issue, has nothing to do with scientists?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472523https://brownsboard.com/post/472523Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:45:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:39:11 GMT]]>Then don't be a moron, The point is, that all these mmgw activists JET to

vacation and go to a mmgw conference. Of course I'm not listening to the politicians.

It's a hyprocitical bunch of bs. And they had REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

on their agenda, while they JET to that vacationland conference.

This isn't an argument about what scientists agree/don't agree.

That isn't the point here. It has ....nothing...to...do...with....scientists.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472519https://brownsboard.com/post/472519Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:39:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:34:43 GMT]]>Oh hey, I was just about to type what Chris basically did, refreshed it first, and BOOM

oh, and I agree with Heck

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472517https://brownsboard.com/post/472517Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:34:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:32:42 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

one is far, far too many on this board already.

How many times do we need to hammer on that head of yours to get to the actual point? We shouldn't be listening to politicians, or 'heads of businesses' - we should be listening to scientists. Maybe it needs to be on the end of a woodpecker's beak to help up get it in there 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472514https://brownsboard.com/post/472514Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:32:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:24:21 GMT]]>Oh, this is good. There's a new consensus global warming wonks can quote

24/7, "eight days a week"...

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/19/the-new-consensus-100-of-scientists-agree-that-global-warming-stopped-or-slowed-down/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472509https://brownsboard.com/post/472509Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:24:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:21:48 GMT]]>Note: I never said they were scientists, Chris.

That has nothing to do with the point. Don't be a woodypeckerhead,

one is far, far too many on this board already.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472508https://brownsboard.com/post/472508Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:21:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:20:01 GMT]]>Here's a good one:

http://www.seattlepi.com/national/article/More-than-10-000-jet-into-Bali-for-global-warming-1257758.php

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472507https://brownsboard.com/post/472507Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:20:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:17:30 GMT]]>Note the lack of scientists...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472505https://brownsboard.com/post/472505Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:17:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:14:15 GMT]]>So, there ya go.....

"Another big theme of the mega-rich confab will be combating “income inequality” and how the world’s rich can pay their fair share to reduce the gap between top earners and the lower class. Admission price for Davos: roughly $40,000 a ticket."

See that? INCOME INEQUALITY. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.

That's why they demand that mmgw be accepted as an absolute, immediate crisis.

To expedite, facilitate... redistributing wealth from the richer countries to the poorer countries.

That is what I've been saying again and again all this time.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472503https://brownsboard.com/post/472503Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:14:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:13:38 GMT]]>"40 heads of state and 2,500 top business executives"

Note the lack of scientists...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472502https://brownsboard.com/post/472502Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:13:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:11:02 GMT]]>Look, here is all you need to know about mmgw.

It's a farce. All these idiots flew in all these JETS, to

go to this Davos conference.

And the other big item on their agenda? Wait for it......

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/20/1700-private-jets-fly-to-davos-to-discuss-global-warming/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472499https://brownsboard.com/post/472499Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:11:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:07:39 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.

You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.

Woody, the slow down was addressed in a link Cal posted as well.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472451https://brownsboard.com/post/472451Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:07:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:07:01 GMT]]>Don't worry guys, I predict there will be a SOTU thread soon enough...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472427https://brownsboard.com/post/472427Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:07:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:57:49 GMT]]>I haven't seen a State of the Union by a president yet that wasn't just complete horse shit. Every president does it but the thing that irritates me the most is the "...and that reminds me of (insert male name) and (insert female name) from Podunk, Iowa who sent me a letter...." It could be on any subject and all of a sudden they can go to the mail bag and come back with some great or awful tale for the audience to gasp or applaud.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472426https://brownsboard.com/post/472426Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:57:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:41:04 GMT]]> Some global warming tonight when Obama spewed his State of the Union hot air.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472423https://brownsboard.com/post/472423Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:41:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:18:06 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.

CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.

Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with

asinine, politically oriented alarmism.

It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...

which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was

the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.

Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,

to the "end justifies the means".

You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.

You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472419https://brownsboard.com/post/472419Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:18:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:42:11 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

I agree. Who gives a shit? We, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have survived before the oceans rise 8 inches.

I would still feel bad about fucking over my great great grandkids. (or maybe just great grandkids for me, idk your age).

I think the notion of "it isn't affecting me now, so it is not my problem" is part of the reason we are here right now.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472417https://brownsboard.com/post/472417Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:42:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:51:18 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

I don't see what you have a problem with woody? He essentially just posted four articles. I'm not reading them, or yours, because I couldn't give a shit about global warming but the fashion in which he posts his isn't bothersome to me.

I agree. Who gives a shit? We, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have survived before the oceans rise 8 inches.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472414https://brownsboard.com/post/472414Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:51:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:05:26 GMT]]>Without curbing rampant population growth we can't stop global warming. It's my opinion that when we become a legit danger something will put a hurting on us. Plague, war, crab people whatever.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472396https://brownsboard.com/post/472396Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:05:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:17:02 GMT]]>I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.

CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.

Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with

asinine, politically oriented alarmism.

It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...

which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was

the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.

Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,

to the "end justifies the means".

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472384https://brownsboard.com/post/472384Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:17:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:16:12 GMT]]>Of course global warming will be back.

It's called summer 😛

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472367https://brownsboard.com/post/472367Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:16:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:50:47 GMT]]>So either Cal's changed his tune on global warming, or didn't really read the article.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/472319https://brownsboard.com/post/472319Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:50:47 GMT