<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud]]></title><description><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html" rel="external nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html</a></div>
<br /><div> </div>
<br /><div><a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/01/10/meteorologist-anthony-watts-on-adjusted-us-temperature-data-in-the-business-and-trading-world-people-go-to-jail-for-such-manipulations-of-data/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/01/10/meteorologist-anthony-watts-on-adjusted-us-temperature-data-in-the-business-and-trading-world-people-go-to-jail-for-such-manipulations-of-data/</a></div>
<br />]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/31877/yep.-can-t-argue-now-with-this-information...man-made-global-warming-is-a-fraud</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:52:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/31877.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:17:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:36:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>libs never admit they were wrong, they just insist</p>
<p>nobody else is right.......</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477728</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477728</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:36:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:22:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/477573">said</a>:</p>
<p>Search this - watch the video.</p>

<p>
<a href="https://celebrity.yahoo.com/video/un-climate-chief-announces-remaking-204543894.html" rel="external nofollow">https://celebrity.yahoo.com/video/un-climate-chief-announces-remaking-204543894.html</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>
Nice find.</p>

<p>
Why so quiet in here?</p>

<p>
Global warming = global redistribution of wealth.</p>
<p>
We told you so a long time ago.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477725</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477725</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stewie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:22:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:05:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Search this - watch the video.</p>

<p><a href="https://celebrity.yahoo.com/video/un-climate-chief-announces-remaking-204543894.html" rel="external nofollow">https://celebrity.yahoo.com/video/un-climate-chief-announces-remaking-204543894.html</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477573</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477573</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:05:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:05:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gftchris" aria-label="Profile: gftchris">@<bdi>gftchris</bdi></a> <a href="/post/477494">said</a>:</p><div><p>Please don't make me go through this point by point...</p></div></blockquote>


<p>That 30 second google search about the author is looking good about now?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477503</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477503</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sadbrownsfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:05:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:24:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Please don't make me go through this point by point...</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477494</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gftChris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:24:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:28:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>In the comments section a poster says this:</strong><br /><br /><em>Fact 1: Excluding CO2 for now, all the other atmospheric gas accounts for 99.96% of the sky.</em><br /><br /><em>Fact 2: CO2 represents only 0.040% (400 ppm) of the atmosphere (concentrated in the lower half of the sky - due to CO2 being denser than predominant Nitrogen, Oxygen and Argon.</em><br /><br /><em>Fact 3: Of the minute amount of CO2 up in the sky, 96.775% of it is Naturally Occurring i.e. produced from Photosynthesis, Respiration, Volcanoes &amp; Geysers, Natural Wildfires, Marine Life, Micro-organisms, Plant Decay, Cellular Respiration, Flatulence, Decomposition, Calcification and Natural Fermentation.<br /><br />Fact 4: This leaves just 3.225% of total minute amount CO2 up in the atmosphere being Man-made (anthropogenic) i.e. burning of Oil, Oil Derivatives, Petrol, Kerosene, Paraffin, Diesel, Coal, Natural Gas, Peat, Biomass, Timber, Crops and Wood &amp; Plant Alcohols.</em><br /><br /><em>Fact 5: Apart from any ‘blame’ for weather events caused by burning of fossil fuels, the above 3.225% of total atmospheric Man-made CO2 should also include the following:<br /><br />Global Alcoholic Beverage Market: Brewing Industry (Beers &amp; Lagers), Wine &amp; Champagne Production, Beer Dispensing and Distillation (fermentation produces CO2)<br /><br />Soft Drinks &amp; Beverage Industry: This includes . . . .<br />All Carbonated Drinks - Worldwide (Man-made manufactured CO2 is injected into sparkling wines, cola &amp; lemonade purely as a novelty effect).<br />Decaffeinated Coffee Manufacture (Caffeine is removed from steamed coffee beans as they fall through 100 feet holding vats of pressurised man-made CO2)<br /><br />Food Manufacture Worldwide: This includes . . . .<br />The World's entire Bread Production ('Air bubbles' from yeast are pockets of pure man-made CO2).<br />Sodium Bicarbonate (Baking Powder) - Aeration used in snack-food industry, biscuit &amp; cracker manufacture and all cakes &amp; sponges.<br />Yeast Extract Manufacture<br />CO2 Induced agricultural poly-tunnels, greenhouses &amp; germination rooms<br />Fermented Soya Bean (for soy sauce, tofu, etc.).<br />Modified Air Packaging (MAP) CO2 is injected into most food packaging to extend food life &amp; prevent it oxidising.<br />Dry Ice (used to keep fruit &amp; vegetables fresh and essential for freeze drying).<br /><br />Refrigeration: All Refrigeration Gas is man-made CO2, All Air-Conditioning (including for cars, homes, shops, offices &amp; aircraft).<br /><br />Industrial Processes: This includes . . . .<br />Coolant Gas (as used in all welding &amp; fabrication)<br />Lime Kiln Processes (as in all cement and brick manufacture)<br />Industrial Waste Incinerators<br />The large-scale burning of household waste<br />Sand Blasting Processes (highly pressurised pellet's of frozen CO2 replaced sand and water in the mid 1970's. This process is also used by large scale bakeries to clean down equipment more efficiently than just using water &amp; detergents).<br />Laser Cutting (Fires an arc of particle-charged CO2 to cut all printed circuit boards for electronics, TV's, computers, car components, etc.)<br /><br />Propellants: Canisters of highly pressurised man-made manufactured<br />CO2 @ 150 psi are used in . . . .<br />All Fire Extinguishers<br />Air Bags in Cars<br />Inflatable Life Jackets<br />Emergency Exit 'Slides' on Aircraft<br /><br />Stage, Film &amp; Theatre: Dry Ice (used to create smoke effects on set) and CO2 Cannons (as used in stunts for film and TV to propel &amp; topple vehicles).<br /><br />Other Uses: These include . . . .<br />Controlling Ph of Water (as used in swimming pools &amp; water purification plants)<br />All Limescale Removal Products (Sulfamic Acid dissolves limescale and produces bubbles of CO2)<br />Liver Salts (The fizz is CO2)<br />Denture Cleaning Products (CO2 bubbles help lift debris from enamel plates)<br />Anything that humans throw out for Composting (decomposing garden waste, peelings, etc.)<br /><br />And lastly (pun intended) . . . .<br /><br />Cremation: Taking one hour to cremate every 7 stone (100 lbs) of body weight, a casket containing a deceased person is placed in an oil or gas fired furnace which generates temperatures of 870oC to 980oC. All human tissue (except bones) evaporates. The remaining bones (3.5% of original body mass) are ground into ashes. The cremation process generates man-made CO2 from the fuel used for heat, the incinerated casket (usually wood) and the combustion of human remains. According to the Office of National Statistics, of the 493,242 registered deaths in the UK in 2010 alone, 360,066 people were cremated<br />(73%).<br /><br />Conclusion:<br />With CO2 representing only 0.040% (400 ppm) of the total atmosphere – and that only 3.225% of the total CO2 is Man-made, then . . . .<br /><br />1. How much man-made CO2 contribution to ‘warming’ (from the list above) could have been produced during the Roman or Medieval warming periods when it was warmer than it is now? Other than burning a few witches, log and peat fires, making a few cakes, a couple of loaves of bread and wine and beer making – not a lot. They certainly didn't drive 4x4's, cut PCBs with lasers or manufacture CO2 filled bags of wonderfully cheesy Twisties!<br /><br />2. If CO2 is such a significant contributor to adverse climatic changes, then why are ‘carbon taxes’ imposed on the sale of Lemonade, Fire Extinguishers, Refrigerants, Bread and Cremation? After-all, it should be a level playing field.</em></p>
<p><strong>^</strong></p>
<p><strong>Don't give the warming cultists any ideas.</strong><br /><br />There is no such thing as man-made CO2 induced warming or CO2 induced climate change. CO2 does not cause extreme weather events. Demonising CO2<br />is just a smokescreen to protect the vested interest in renewable energy<br />projects.</p>


<p><strong>Except that it goes deeper than protecting the vested interest in renewable energy...it's also about micro-managing our lives and global wealth distribution.</strong></p>
<p><strong>When are you liberal dickheads gonna get it?</strong></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477490</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stewie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:28:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:55:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/477473">said</a>:</p><div>

<p style="color:rgb(164,164,164)">Posted Yesterday, 11:24 AM</p>
<div style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/oct/13/christopher-booker" title="External link" rel="external nofollow">http://www.theguardi...istopher-booker</a></p>
<p>*******************************************</p>
<p>   Doesn't explain why booker is wrong, just bitches and bitches...</p>

<p>and the part about how many builders...asbestos.... </p>

<p>seriously? </p>
</div>

</div></blockquote>
<p>Exactly, you can't just dismiss something like this by discrediting an intermediary reporter, that's what I said! You need to actually look at the initial accusation and investigate its validity, like I did in the subsequent post.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477487</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477487</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gftChris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:55:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:19:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p style="color:rgb(164,164,164)">Posted Yesterday, 11:24 AM</p>
<div style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/oct/13/christopher-booker" title="External link" rel="external nofollow">http://www.theguardi...istopher-booker</a></p>
<p>*******************************************</p>
<p>   Doesn't explain why booker is wrong, just bitches and bitches...</p>

<p>and the part about how many builders...asbestos.... </p>

<p>seriously? </p>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477473</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477473</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:19:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:15:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Godspeed Chris </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477390</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477390</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:15:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:10:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/sadbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: sadbrownsfan">@<bdi>sadbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/477324">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>Lets see spend 30 secs Googling and finding a article ridiculing the first author and how he has used misinformation in many areas, or spend 15-20 mins to dispute and explain the information in one of Cal's mmgw is a hoax threads...... Good Luck</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>Fair point. But I've always felt that when your *only* defence of an argument is to discredit the messenger, you're in trouble. For example, if the source had not cited his sources, then we could just disregard it. But since it was sourced and cited, it requires some explanation, in my mind at least.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477332</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477332</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gftChris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:10:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:01:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gftchris" aria-label="Profile: gftchris">@<bdi>gftchris</bdi></a> <a href="/post/477320">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>Christopher Booker, while a colossal idiot, is only passing on information from a blog that is actually citing its sources. you can't just point out the idiocy of the messenger and stop there. In this case, the source seems to be claiming differences in the raw data and the presented data - this is actually stated on the GISS website, you can get the data 'after homogeneity adjustments' or raw, or 'after removing suspicious records' - which I assume is statistical outliers but it would be good to have an explanation of what qualifies as suspicious.</p>

<p>For an overview of homogeneity adjustment, you can read <a href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/downloads/peterson-easterling-ors-1998.pdf" rel="external nofollow">this paper</a>. Put briefly, it's about the light pollution of urban areas impacting the temperature records compared to times in the past when places were less urban - there's no point comparing modern day New York with New York of 500 years ago, for example, when its temperature was presumably much closer to that of the areas around it, unlike today where it's likely to be a few degrees higher.</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>Lets see spend 30 secs Googling and finding a article ridiculing the first author and how he has used misinformation in many areas, or spend 15-20 mins to dispute and explain the information in one of Cal's mmgw is a hoax threads...... Good Luck</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477324</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477324</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sadbrownsfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:01:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:53:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Booker, while a colossal idiot, is only passing on information from a blog that is actually citing its sources. you can't just point out the idiocy of the messenger and stop there. In this case, the source seems to be claiming differences in the raw data and the presented data - this is actually stated on the GISS website, you can get the data 'after homogeneity adjustments' or raw, or 'after removing suspicious records' - which I assume is statistical outliers but it would be good to have an explanation of what qualifies as suspicious.</p>

<p>For an overview of homogeneity adjustment, you can read <a href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/downloads/peterson-easterling-ors-1998.pdf" rel="external nofollow">this paper</a>. Put briefly, it's about the light pollution of urban areas impacting the temperature records compared to times in the past when places were less urban - there's no point comparing modern day New York with New York of 500 years ago, for example, when its temperature was presumably much closer to that of the areas around it, unlike today where it's likely to be a few degrees higher.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477320</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477320</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gftChris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:53:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:24:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/oct/13/christopher-booker" rel="external nofollow">http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/oct/13/christopher-booker</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477313</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477313</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sadbrownsfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:24:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:28:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/01/27/climatologist-dr-pat-michaels-suggests-feds-altering-temperature-data-for-political-reasons-the-raw-temperature-data-is-continually-adjusted-to-show-more-warming/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/01/27/climatologist-dr-pat-michaels-suggests-feds-altering-temperature-data-for-political-reasons-the-raw-temperature-data-is-continually-adjusted-to-show-more-warming/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477233</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477233</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:28:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:26:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2015/01/warmists-take-hardest-hits/" rel="external nofollow">http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2015/01/warmists-take-hardest-hits/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477232</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477232</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:26:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yep. Can't argue now, with this information...man made global warming is a fraud on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:20:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>And yes, mmgw is a UN ploy, to redistribute the wealth of the globe.</p>

<p>From richer to poorer countries.</p>

<p>It's just a farcical means to their intended goal.</p>

<p><a href="https://celebrity.yahoo.com/video/un-climate-chief-announces-remaking-204543894.html" rel="external nofollow">https://celebrity.yahoo.com/video/un-climate-chief-announces-remaking-204543894.html</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/477231</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/477231</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:20:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>