<![CDATA[Jimmy Graham Trade.]]>Is there anyone that would have traded Alex Mack and the late First rounder for Jimmy Graham??

He is a really nice target for anyone to throw to. I think if we coulda negotiated a late pick or filler player I woulda done it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/32287/jimmy-graham-trade.RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:32:09 GMTThu, 12 Mar 2015 00:38:12 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:23:21 GMT]]>I think it's stupid for Seattle UNLESS they know for a fact that the backup is a stud. Their offense is built around a dirty run game and deadly play action. Well you need an elite OL for that.

If you're going to change the offense then there's no point in resigning Lynch.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484782https://brownsboard.com/post/484782Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:23:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:49:11 GMT]]>

@cdl15 said:

Is there anyone that would have traded Alex Mack and the late First rounder for Jimmy Graham??

No...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484694https://brownsboard.com/post/484694Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:49:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:55:30 GMT]]>

@texasag1969 said:

Who played in his place those 6 games? And for the record, never trade Mack. He is key to this whole offense when healthy.

Also serves as a convenient excuse warranted or otherwise.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484664https://brownsboard.com/post/484664Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:55:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:10:35 GMT]]>

@londonbrown said:

Seahawks went 6-0 when Max Unger was out.

It's safe to say we didn't go 6-0 when Mack was out...

Who played in his place those 6 games? And for the record, never trade Mack. He is key to this whole offense when healthy.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484639https://brownsboard.com/post/484639Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:10:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:01:11 GMT]]>Seahawks went 6-0 when Max Unger was out.

It's safe to say we didn't go 6-0 when Mack was out...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484637https://brownsboard.com/post/484637Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:01:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:33:15 GMT]]>man, am i on planet earth? wtf? trade mack and our 19th for graham?

c'mon man.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484601https://brownsboard.com/post/484601Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:33:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:55:18 GMT]]>The Seahawks have an established QB. We don't.

That's why you don't make that trade.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484582https://brownsboard.com/post/484582Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:55:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:46:35 GMT]]>I agree. The Seahawks realized they came up short and went out and got one of the best weapons in football. Alex Mack and Joe Thomas as good as they are haven't gotten us close to a Super Bowl. Great trade for the Seahawks but they have the pieces in place for another run. The Browns are so far behind the Patriots and Seattle it would take a miracle!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484579https://brownsboard.com/post/484579Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:46:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:48:24 GMT]]>In that case, it's a toughie. I'm a Graham fan and he would've given us a big vertical target which would've helped out JM but after seeing our line without Mack, I'm not sure if it wouldn't end up as a wash.

I think it boils down to what you think is a QB's best friend, a running game or a TE.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484552https://brownsboard.com/post/484552Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:48:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:43:47 GMT]]>Jist hypothetical. They gonna have to pay center big money eventually

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484549https://brownsboard.com/post/484549Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:43:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Jimmy Graham Trade. on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:41:41 GMT]]>It would've defeated the whole purpose of the Saints trading Graham to begin with. Mack's salary is too high.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/484546https://brownsboard.com/post/484546Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:41:41 GMT