<![CDATA[T Rich Cut]]>What do you think he'll do?




The Indianapolis Colts have waived running back Trent Richardson, the team announced Thursday.


Richardson, the No. 3 overall pick in the 2012 draft, rushed for 977 yards (3.1 yards a carry) and six touchdowns on 316 carries over his two seasons with the Colts, who acquired him fromCleveland Browns in exchange for a first-round draft pick on September 18, 2013.


The Colts paid Richardson $1.1 million in 2013 and $2.2 million last season.


]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/32300/t-rich-cutRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 12:45:06 GMTThu, 12 Mar 2015 21:48:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:27:46 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

you are all blind...

😵

Why are you so enamoured with a guy who hasn't done shit?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486664https://brownsboard.com/post/486664Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:27:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:26:54 GMT]]>Camp / practice squad fodder. He's cheap but his attitude and ethic sucks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486663https://brownsboard.com/post/486663Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:26:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:25:20 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

you are all blind...

😵

Actually you're the only one who's blind. He has done nothing in the NFL. Would be one of the greatest comebacks in NFL history if he turns out to be as good as everyone thought when he was the #3 overall pick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486618https://brownsboard.com/post/486618Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:25:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:23:42 GMT]]>Actually, it's a brilliant move by the Raiders. They can point to their other rb's, including

a draft pick, and say:

"See? That's your brain when you're all talk, too heavy, and you don't love the game. Get yer asses in gear,

or you'll end up like him"

and then they can cut him in training camp.

Brilliant, really.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486594https://brownsboard.com/post/486594Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:23:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:01:32 GMT]]>He can do low budget porn.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486591https://brownsboard.com/post/486591Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:01:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:56:15 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

you are all blind...

😵

and somewhere in the background as you type your praises for TR the soundtrack for ROCKY starts playing.......

sorry Po, know you love the guy but you're going to have to admit (one day) the guy sucks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486590https://brownsboard.com/post/486590Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:56:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:44:31 GMT]]>you are all blind...

😵

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486589https://brownsboard.com/post/486589Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:44:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:01:26 GMT]]>I don't think there's a big chance of Trich "poisoning" the Oak lockerroom..he's not that kind of guy. I just don't see what they see in him to give him a contract. He can't run, block, catch etc, etc. Just mystified.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486580https://brownsboard.com/post/486580Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:01:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:37:05 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

That is not Vet minimum.$1.5 million was all he's worth, that's vet minimum for TR. Seriously overpaid for the bum.

If you can't do better than 3.3 ypc with a qb like Andrew Luck to take the pressure off, and get demoted behind the likes of Bradshaw and Herron- who both posted better ypc - you SUCK.

I've seen enough to realize the guy has no field vision, no burst, and no breakaway gear.

It's a move without risk for Oakland, they have to spend money and there aren't many worthy players still out there in FA, might as well pay Richardson 2M. It's not like they're gonna win many more games this year.

And to think the Browns could have had Poe, Kuechly, Cox or even Tannehill... but no, they also gave up a 4th, 5th and 7th...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486570https://brownsboard.com/post/486570Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:37:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:43:19 GMT]]>In a just world, this signing would cost the Raiders GM his job. The money given is irresponsible and stupid.

The risk is that Richardson will poison the team lockerroom due to his apathy and suckitude.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486551https://brownsboard.com/post/486551Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:43:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:02:38 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

Now maybe the Browns can resign him.....and see if they can get something out of their former 1st round pick.

Hey....I would be willing to throw him in with the wolves and see if he could do something.

(but...in reality...what a waste....pathetic turn of events for him)

Can you say "Canada"?

Can you say Cannibus?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486477https://brownsboard.com/post/486477Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:02:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:19:59 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

I've seen enough to realize the guy has no field vision, no burst, and no breakaway gear.

but yet his cock does.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486371https://brownsboard.com/post/486371Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:19:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:44:25 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

$3.9m 2 year deal

That is not Vet minimum.$1.5 million was all he's worth, that's vet minimum for TR. Seriously overpaid for the bum.

If you can't do better than 3.3 ypc with a qb like Andrew Luck to take the pressure off, and get demoted behind the likes of Bradshaw and Herron- who both posted better ypc - you SUCK.

I've seen enough to realize the guy has no field vision, no burst, and no breakaway gear.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486357https://brownsboard.com/post/486357Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:44:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:30:35 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

$3.9m 2 year deal

Wow. He basically quit on Indy and they made him 4th string by the end of the season. And Oakland pays him $4 Mil? OK.

Zombo

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486328https://brownsboard.com/post/486328Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:30:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:56:27 GMT]]>Does this mean TR won't be at the FA Combine?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486306https://brownsboard.com/post/486306Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:56:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:45:18 GMT]]>eh...to me, he just doesn't fit the Raider mold.....except he's a bad player who they signed for too much....but still not a raider type

I saw him landing in Miami or Dallas or Philly maybe......(and on the cheap too)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486253https://brownsboard.com/post/486253Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:45:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:40:12 GMT]]>

@mudfly said:

well, that didn't take long...gotta say Im a bit surprised he was signed so fast and for that kind of $.....

Raider nation will eat his fat slow ass for breakfast, so he better come to play this time...

Raider nation don't eat nothing but greasy home fries for breakfast.....why do you think they would eat him up.....when that team has been full of nothing but a bunch of TRs for the past decade.

While I enjoy their antics, they are perhaps the most overrated fan base in the league (or 2d most overrated behind Pittsburgh). Isn't their stadium only usually about half full. (which is what Pittsburgh's would be if they had the Raider's record that same decade)?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486251https://brownsboard.com/post/486251Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:40:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:49:10 GMT]]>well, that didn't take long...gotta say Im a bit surprised he was signed so fast and for that kind of $.....

Raider nation will eat his fat slow ass for breakfast, so he better come to play this time...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486239https://brownsboard.com/post/486239Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:49:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:39:35 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

In a word- no.

Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.

$3.9m 2 year deal

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486236https://brownsboard.com/post/486236Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:39:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:38:43 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

Seriously, though Mik, Richardson coming back to run for the New Cleveland Browns F.O.

- would that not be redemption if he produced?

I was only slightly kidding about Colt. I'd love to have him back to mentor Manziel. I think Colt is very smart, and even a better QB than McCown. You seriously telling me you wouldn't consider this?

In a word- no.

@d-bone said:

I would bring him back, for sure.

There has to be a peanut vendor who needs to be replaced.

Oakland will show again why they're always at the bottom of the AFC West. I'm totally shocked they gave him more than vet minimum, and if they guaranteed any of that contract- they're out of their minds. Pure desperation- no Jones-Drew & McFadden. There's several RBs in the current draft with more potential than Richardson, who IMHO has none.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486235https://brownsboard.com/post/486235Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:38:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:49:41 GMT]]>Signing with Raiders

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486216https://brownsboard.com/post/486216Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:49:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:49:33 GMT]]>Trent signing with Oakland lol, of course, who else. . .

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/486215https://brownsboard.com/post/486215Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:49:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:59:07 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Old news, old FOs...

The potential, yes, potential, 1st round misses in 2014 are hovering, but everything else the FO did in 2014's draft and FA was damn good.

This year the disappointed decry our reluctance to shell out money hand over fist. Many are likely the same folks that said Haslam order the drafting of JM so he could sell jerseys. Where they see reluctance I see fiscal restraint.

And McGahee was an emergency signing in late Septmeber. Not a lot of prime, FA RBs waiting by the phone in late Sept. So there's that...

Yeah, I don't disagree there. The team has seemingly had good luck with later round picks, but the point is you can't miss that badly in the first round especially when you got more than one pick. Thinking about the 2012 first round draft is straight up pathetic. We could have thrown darts at a board and gotten better players.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/485882https://brownsboard.com/post/485882Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:59:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T Rich Cut on Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:45:29 GMT]]>for people to even entertain the thought of him coming back here is beyond me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/485875https://brownsboard.com/post/485875Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:45:29 GMT