<![CDATA[sage 4th???]]>if the vikes are willing to give up a 4th for that guy then we should b able to get nothing lower than a 2nd for DA esp after we take his cap hit DA is way better than sage and would b a starter first so we should deffently b able to get a 2nd for DA

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3255/sage-4thRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:45:55 GMTTue, 24 Feb 2009 04:56:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to sage 4th??? on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:52:22 GMT]]>yes this is true i understand what ur saying but compare da to sage da is way better than sage IMO so we should b able to get a 2nd if the vikes are going to give a 4th for a back up qb da is starter material but we invested to much into BQ so we have to make a decision soon on who we want as our qb of the futuer

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/45813https://brownsboard.com/post/45813Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:52:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sage 4th??? on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:00:42 GMT]]>

@why-cant-we-win said:

if the vikes are willing to give up a 4th for that guy then we should b able to get nothing lower than a 2nd for DA esp after we take his cap hit DA is way better than sage and would b a starter first so we should deffently b able to get a 2nd for DA

If he can be a starter and is that good sholdn't we keep him?

IMO, he isn't that good and that's why we will have a problem getting a 3rd even after we pay most of his 2009 salary.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/45540https://brownsboard.com/post/45540Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:00:42 GMT