@sir-barksalot said:

Theme song already in place.

@gftchris said:

The London Double Deckers?

The London Mashers.

@the-gipper said:

We are just having fun with flags....err, I mean sports team name.

The London Rippers.

Too soon...

The London Rippers.

@texasag1969 said:

The London Bridges.....but they would have to make a trade for the Vikings QB.

@the-gipper said:

Lime green unis for the London Limeys

@the-gipper said:

If we go by this the Browns will sure bolster their defensive line with both Shelton and Brown. What would you think about that?

I think that would be idiotic.

The only reason Shelton does not dominate our 12 pick more than he does is that he did not make it to 12 in most mocks. The same reason explains why Brown ranks as high as he does at 19.

@gftchris said:

Taking a RB in round 1 makes zero sense for the browns. I can see us going edge-rusher and WR though.

Mel does much better at evaluating players than he does team needs... and he never seems to consider a GM's proclivities.

There's a team here called London Blitz which is decent.

@gftchris said:

You think because your avatar is a Bulldog that London would be entitled to use that name?!! No sir. That belongs to NEOhio (three champions: Canton Bulldogs/Cleveland Bulldogs). We reserve that name.

Ka-nig-its....OK.

The Broils....better yet.

@the-gipper said:

No, I mean Michael Bowie, OL, signed last year and stashed on IR. I did not think Dwayne Bowe, WR, would be OL depth/competition.

London Spiders? Nah, we're good thanks. It'll end up being bulldogs, knights, or something like that.

@gftchris said:

Bowie? Do you mean Bowe WR?

Speaking of Bowie and football, if London got a team what would you think of naming them The Spiders?

(just fyi, Cleveland once had a major league baseball team named The Spiders: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Spiders

@the-gipper said:

That would be valid if Farmer had picked all of those players. He's picked one skill player, high (literally?) that didn't work out in Manziel. But that's not exactly indicative.

We are pretty set at OL, for starters at least, IMO. We also have Bowie who seems to be featuring in Pettine's plans as well for depth/competition. I wouldn't be outraged by another OL at some point, but I wouldn't like it in round 1, when we have very pressing needs, and quality players available to fill those needs.

@darren15 said:

Thanks, Ghoolie.

The problem is, historically, when the Browns have taken an OL in round one, they have done well (JT/Mack/Faine). When they have taken offensive skill players, they have been busts.....Quinn/Weeden/Braylon/JFF/William Green/Richardson/K2

I guess, for me, it is a matter of trust. Clearly they can't pick a quality offensive skill players (at least not one that doesn't turn brain dead and flame out...like K2/Braylon).....but they can pick OL.

@gftchris said:

Well, you could take the list I posted and do the breakdown yourself......I thought about posting their positions, but since I was doing lot of typing I skipped that.

DT, DE/OLB ILB WR please with first 4 picks

@thenew23 said:

Only if the cheerleaders are unveiling them.

@texasag1969 said:

What are you talking about!?!? Only 4 days until the uniforms are unveiled...