<![CDATA[Chris Christie]]>If this guy runs will he have a chance to win?

If this is his stance, then the answer is a resounding NO

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/14/chris-christie-marijuana_n_7066636.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

Plus he's a friend of Jerrah Jones and a Cowboys fan.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/32695/chris-christieRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:46:57 GMTWed, 15 Apr 2015 20:01:51 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:08:01 GMT]]>

@larryfine said:

This country hasn't been right since Nancy "the blowjob queen of Hollywood" Reagan ran things!

go browns

omg I actually looked that up. I never had a clue that was the rumor about her. Wow. From many different people too. Nancy Davis got around apparently.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/496260https://brownsboard.com/post/496260Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:08:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Fri, 17 Apr 2015 22:37:17 GMT]]>This country hasn't been right since Nancy "the blowjob queen of Hollywood" Reagan ran things!

go browns

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/494465https://brownsboard.com/post/494465Fri, 17 Apr 2015 22:37:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:50:48 GMT]]>

@mohican said:

that stance is only a small strike against him.

What about being a Cowboys fan?

Strike 2?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493676https://brownsboard.com/post/493676Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:50:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:09:46 GMT]]>

@browns149 said:

If this guy runs will he have a chance to win?

If this is his stance, then the answer is a resounding NO

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/14/chris-christie-marijuana_n_7066636.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

Plus he's a friend of Jerrah Jones and a Cowboys fan.

that stance is only a small strike against him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493487https://brownsboard.com/post/493487Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:09:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:50 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

To one portion of that argument I support the idea that the president of the United States should enforce federal law. The President of the United States swears to uphold the laws in the Constitution does he not? If, and this is for all you liberals, the state outlawed gay marriage or some other thing you like, don't you think the federal courts should take precedence? Does anyone think the president should allow the Attorney General to overlook immigration laws when city politicians offer refuge? He's probably right about weed but that's another subject I give a very small hair off a rats ass about.

WSS

1. The president is supposed to execute things brought about by Congress. Hence the executive Branch. If DOMA and RFRA laws are still on the books then the President should have his various agencies protect these laws. If a bill comes to his desk that is against the constitution then he should veto it.

2. There is very little law itself in the Constitution for The United States. What law there is deals with some things like treason. The Constitution is mainly a charter of government. It lists who does what on a federal level. Beyond that the (forgotten and ignored) ninth and tenth amendments say that if it's not mentioned in the Constitution, then its for the states and the people to decide.

3. What I think is of little matter because precedent, especially since the FDR regime is different. But I think that the Federal Government has power over the States only where spelled out in the charter ie Constitution says so. Because the US originally operated as a Federal versus National system things like religion, marriage laws, gun laws, immigration, slavery, mining laws, etc were left to the states.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493485https://brownsboard.com/post/493485Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:53:01 GMT]]>I was upset with Christie as well when they gave him a prime speaking spot at the convention and instead of what he was supposed to be talking about (Romney versus Obama) he spent a lot of time promoting himself.

And he did go way overboard with hugging Obama but he got rewarded with Obama putting him on the telephone with his rock idol Bruce Springsteen....it didn't seem to matter to Christie a week before the election how much he was hurting Romney's chances of winning.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493393https://brownsboard.com/post/493393Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:53:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:02:39 GMT]]>

@clevfan4life said:

you honestly think his time with Obama, during HURRICANE SANDY, is a bigger mark against him than Bridgegate? I was gonna say you can't be serious but.............this is the world I live in and these are the people that inhabit it. I've just come to accept that people are basically corrupt.

Like I said I think he went over the top with the Obama love. This was during a presidential election.

And if he is working for support from his party he might recognize that's a two way street.

And no I don't expect him to attack the president during a natural disaster but politically a firm handshake and telling the public that in times of crisis rivals can always find a way to work together would be my choice.

Bad mounting your parties candidate because you are in a snit about the vice presidential selection is in bad form and not likely to win you and Support of that party next time.

And one more time for the record Bridgegate is a non issue.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493385https://brownsboard.com/post/493385Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:02:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:51:52 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Yeah I think he went over the line with the Obama love and the slight to Mitt Romney. I don't give a fuck about Bridgegate. Not even the tiniest most miniscule microscopic fuck in the world.

WSS

you honestly think his time with Obama, during HURRICANE SANDY, is a bigger mark against him than Bridgegate? I was gonna say you can't be serious but.............this is the world I live in and these are the people that inhabit it. I've just come to accept that people are basically corrupt.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493351https://brownsboard.com/post/493351Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:51:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:25:15 GMT]]>

@walterwhite said:

Republicans and Democrats are fucking vomit inducing.

Why can't we just elect someone like Gary Johnson or Bob Barr?

REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS WON'T LET ANY 3RD PARTY CANDIDATE INTO THE DEBATES. FUCKING CRIMINALS

Of course they won't

If a 3rd party came in, and people on both sides like that person, the dems and reps lose all their power.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493340https://brownsboard.com/post/493340Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:25:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:55:27 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Your biggest issue with him is that he doesn't hate Obama? Haha

Yeah I think he went over the line with the Obama love and the slight to Mitt Romney. I don't give a fuck about Bridgegate. Not even the tiniest most miniscule microscopic fuck in the world.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493310https://brownsboard.com/post/493310Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:55:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:21:57 GMT]]>Republicans and Democrats are fucking vomit inducing.

Why can't we just elect someone like Gary Johnson or Bob Barr?

REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS WON'T LET ANY 3RD PARTY CANDIDATE INTO THE DEBATES. FUCKING CRIMINALS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493299https://brownsboard.com/post/493299Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:21:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:17:46 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

He's a loudmouth unprincipled idiot. NO.

And, he hugged Obamao, and wanted to give him great big smoochies.

NO.

Your biggest issue with him is that he doesn't hate Obama? Haha

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493297https://brownsboard.com/post/493297Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:17:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:57:26 GMT]]>He's a loudmouth unprincipled idiot. NO.

And, he hugged Obamao, and wanted to give him great big smoochies.

NO.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493281https://brownsboard.com/post/493281Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:57:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:57:01 GMT]]>weed? he would be enforcing federal laws by saying he'd do that. - but its just talk right now.

Didnt you guys hear what his plans are for SS benefits for the 1%ers?

my guess is like some prior here - who cares! http://www.wsj.com/articles/christie-to-call-for-raising-age-for-social-security-cutting-benefit-for-some-seniors-1429018212

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493280https://brownsboard.com/post/493280Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:57:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:52:50 GMT]]>

@sadbrownsfan said:

Couldn't be any worse than when Taft got stuck in a Tub.

I'm sure Christie could get a bigger tub now

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493278https://brownsboard.com/post/493278Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:52:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:47:56 GMT]]>Anyone from New Joisey I don't want as President.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493275https://brownsboard.com/post/493275Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:47:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:45:54 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

He would be one to know about addiction. He's clearly addicted to food.

How can he take of this country if he can't even take care of his body?

Etc

No I really don't care. His stance on weed though, no thanks. It doesn't seem grounded in facts in the slightest.

Couldn't be any worse than when Taft got stuck in a Tub.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493274https://brownsboard.com/post/493274Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:45:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:37:36 GMT]]>He would be one to know about addiction. He's clearly addicted to food.

How can he take of this country if he can't even take care of his body?

Etc

No I really don't care. His stance on weed though, no thanks. It doesn't seem grounded in facts in the slightest.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493267https://brownsboard.com/post/493267Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:37:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:33:10 GMT]]>I actually liked this cat a lot, even though I didn't agree with absolutely everything with him, until that bridge scandal though. It's such a classically douche Jersey thing to do. It's about as petty BS as I can think of. I'll be perfectly honest...because I don't feel any one party should run everything, if the house and senate were democrat it would have been between him and Rand for me. Now that the republicans run the house and senate though...no way.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493265https://brownsboard.com/post/493265Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:33:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:23:07 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

To one portion of that argument I support the idea that the president of the United States should enforce federal law. The President of the United States swears to uphold the laws in the Constitution does he not? If, and this is for all you liberals, the state outlawed gay marriage or some other thing you like, don't you think the federal courts should take precedence? Does anyone think the president should allow the Attorney General to overlook immigration laws when city politicians offer refuge? He's probably right about weed but that's another subject I give a very small hair off a rats ass about.

WSS

While that is all true, a lot of people don't care about that.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493259https://brownsboard.com/post/493259Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:23:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:09:56 GMT]]>To one portion of that argument I support the idea that the president of the United States should enforce federal law. The President of the United States swears to uphold the laws in the Constitution does he not? If, and this is for all you liberals, the state outlawed gay marriage or some other thing you like, don't you think the federal courts should take precedence? Does anyone think the president should allow the Attorney General to overlook immigration laws when city politicians offer refuge? He's probably right about weed but that's another subject I give a very small hair off a rats ass about.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493256https://brownsboard.com/post/493256Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:09:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:09:39 GMT]]>

@browns149 said:

Didn't he have some sort of surgery to lose weight?

That's cheating and it rarely works for long.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493255https://brownsboard.com/post/493255Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:09:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:06:55 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

Not if he's still fat.

Didn't he have some sort of surgery to lose weight?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493250https://brownsboard.com/post/493250Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:06:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chris Christie on Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:02:26 GMT]]>Not if he's still fat.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/493245https://brownsboard.com/post/493245Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:02:26 GMT