<![CDATA[Warner headed to San Fran]]>Pending a physical. He's taking it right now.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3402/warner-headed-to-san-franRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 00:55:57 GMTTue, 03 Mar 2009 00:32:51 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:03:36 GMT]]>if the cards get warner they may trade up in the draft to someone with top 5 talent. there number 1 concern is qb and if they get warner they don't have to worry about that position for two years. singletary may want another ilb and trade to 2 for curry. if they don't get curry, maybe they trade to the browns for 5th and then the browns get their 10th overall and another pick. it probably won't happen, but it's possible.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48314https://brownsboard.com/post/48314Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:03:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:44:25 GMT]]>there's a great article on Yahoo sports why the Cards need to stop playing around and give Warner his due.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48283https://brownsboard.com/post/48283Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:44:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:04:27 GMT]]>Don't count Warner in San Fran until he signs the contract. IMO, he's calling the Cards bluff.

Ariz underpaid him for 2 years and now they are still trying to lowball him. They only want to guarantee 1 year of the contract at $10 million and no guarantee or buyout for next year. They deserve to lose him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48216https://brownsboard.com/post/48216Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:04:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:59:55 GMT]]>I know he took a physical and met with them but I have not seen anything that has said warner has actually signed with the niners. Until that happens It looks to me like he is just trying to get his value from the cards.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48215https://brownsboard.com/post/48215Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:59:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:48:29 GMT]]>Arizona just went back to mthe stone ages....i.e pre-2008

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48214https://brownsboard.com/post/48214Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:48:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:14:58 GMT]]>

@cmac12 said:

Other than Lum who is upset? I have seen alot of people say you don't need to trade DA but nobody but Lum says that you can not move on to BQ. I have seen it said that if DA stays that it should be an open competition for the Qb spot, but I don't see what issue you would have with that. You want the best one starting and if that is BQ he will start.

I guess I don't see your point really since not many say you can't move on. Most say move on and see what you got. Most also say get fair value for DA, which looks to be a third round pick with maybe a 5th added. Stock pile the draft picks and build from personnel evaluation.

Agree. Great majority say move on, but we've had a zillion threads still debating the QB situation, competition vs naming a starter, etc. There's more than just Lum defending DA. It's not everyone vs him.

But, I didn't mean to turn this into a Browns QB thread. My fault.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48208https://brownsboard.com/post/48208Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:14:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:39:25 GMT]]>I think Warner has already established himself as a Hall of Fame QB. I don't think he's too worried about his legacy.

Personally, I'd rather throw to Larry Fitzgerald than just about anybody, but I'm not the one being offered millions to throw to someone else.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48203https://brownsboard.com/post/48203Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:39:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:16:15 GMT]]>Other than Lum who is upset? I have seen alot of people say you don't need to trade DA but nobody but Lum says that you can not move on to BQ. I have seen it said that if DA stays that it should be an open competition for the Qb spot, but I don't see what issue you would have with that. You want the best one starting and if that is BQ he will start.

I guess I don't see your point really since not many say you can't move on. Most say move on and see what you got. Most also say get fair value for DA, which looks to be a third round pick with maybe a 5th added. Stock pile the draft picks and build from personnel evaluation.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48191https://brownsboard.com/post/48191Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:16:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:11:14 GMT]]>So, why is anyone upset the Browns are moving on to Quinn when the Cardinals are willing to part with Warner and go with Leinart?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48189https://brownsboard.com/post/48189Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:11:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:39:07 GMT]]>

oldcow1945 said:

Why not finish what you started in Arizona for a mere 10 million? At least you'd have your health Kurt!

not to mention a better possibility of making the Super Bowl again.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48178https://brownsboard.com/post/48178Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:39:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:39:11 GMT]]> Jesus works in mysterious ways . 🤔]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48148https://brownsboard.com/post/48148Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:39:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:31:55 GMT]]>

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Jesus wants him to help the less fortunate.

That was a classic!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48143https://brownsboard.com/post/48143Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:31:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:31:13 GMT]]>If SF struggles on offense people will wonder "Was Warner really that good?" People have short term memories and remember your last years which is why Jim Brown left when he did. Watching lawrence taylor trying to catch up to a QB in his last season is an example.

I would have taken the path to stay with a team that I had been to the superbowl with. They must not have been that interested in keeping him

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48142https://brownsboard.com/post/48142Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:31:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:17:55 GMT]]>Jesus wants him to help the less fortunate.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48139https://brownsboard.com/post/48139Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:17:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:57:42 GMT]]>This really surprises me. He's been in the league for years. I'm sure he has a bundle of cash. For a couple million more he wants to go to a San Fran team that is rebuilding and a team that gave up 55 sacks last year?! He'll be lucky to make it out of there alive.

Why not finish what you started in Arizona for a mere 10 million? At least you'd have your health Kurt!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48134https://brownsboard.com/post/48134Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:57:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:49:32 GMT]]>i don't think they're comfortable with leinart, though the only way to find out what they've got in the kid is to let him play, which, if i'm involved with the cards, i'm more than inclined to do at this point.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48132https://brownsboard.com/post/48132Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:49:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:38:30 GMT]]>I think Arizona has said their goodbyes. They've got Boldin, Wilson, and Rolle to resign.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48124https://brownsboard.com/post/48124Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:38:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:37:07 GMT]]>though he took a physical at stanford, nothing's official yet. he'd be wise to let arizona sweat it out a little and use this as a ploy to get them to up their offer.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48121https://brownsboard.com/post/48121Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:37:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:35:48 GMT]]>Too Cool, whatever Warner gets he earned

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48120https://brownsboard.com/post/48120Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:35:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Warner headed to San Fran on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:33:41 GMT]]>I'm guessing San Fran can sit and wait for the future QB at #10, either Stafford or Sanchez, and give them a year to learn behind Gramps.

Nice plan.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/48119https://brownsboard.com/post/48119Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:33:41 GMT