<![CDATA[T.O. released]]>Not really Browns related, but if we were looking to trade Edwards this would hurt our chances. You could pick up the #2 drops leader in the NFL instead of trading for #1. Older, and more of a headache but probably better production unless Edwards gets out of his funk.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3448/t.o.-releasedRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 04:26:30 GMTThu, 05 Mar 2009 05:06:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:43:40 GMT]]>

@dtbh said:

Please God... don't let the market be so weak for this guy that the Steelers are tempted to sign him to some tiny ass 2 year deal... I could see Mike Tomlin getting along with TO and pulling the best out of him...

The kind of team that would sign TO is a team that thinks they could have a legitimate shot at the Super Bowl this year, and is also thin at wide receiver. That description does not fit any of the teams in the AFC North; Baltimore comes closest to the kind of team that would sign TO. Pittsburgh does not sign players who are a pain in the backfield. None of the other teams in the division have any kind of a shot short term and with TO there is no long term, so why would they take him on? TO is now at the age where he may soon have to become a slot receiver. I can't see his ego allowing that, or any team with sense paying him the kind of money he expects, for that role. But I don't know, bad short sighted management is what got this country in the state it's in, and football is not immune. I'm sure someone is stupid enough to sign him; after all, men keep asking Paris Hilton out to dinner, don't they?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/50171https://brownsboard.com/post/50171Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:43:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:07:12 GMT]]>

@riffer-x said:

LOL, funny thing is I changed it from core (meaning core players) to corps (meaning a group of players). Ironically, either one would fit in that situation but I wanted to look smarter than the average bear and apparently it worked

both you and alo are quite correct about corps or core being interchangeable and fairly equivalent in this case. corps just appeals to my grammatically elitist sensibilities. i'm a language snob like that.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/50008https://brownsboard.com/post/50008Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:07:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:01:07 GMT]]>TO always does good as a perfect team mate his first year on a team then it's downhill from there.

He'll be a good boy, get a big bonus then throw a hissy fit to get cut and make more somewhere else.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/50006https://brownsboard.com/post/50006Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:01:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:50:14 GMT]]>

Aloysius said:

lol. I've used "core" many times, thinking it was similar to how one would talk about a team having "a nice core group of young players."

The "right one" makes more sense, but I'll keep using the other one just to piss you off πŸ˜‰

LOL, funny thing is I changed it from core (meaning core players) to corps (meaning a group of players). Ironically, either one would fit in that situation but I wanted to look smarter than the average bear and apparently it worked πŸ™‚

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49989https://brownsboard.com/post/49989Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:50:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:17:14 GMT]]>

@jewdago said:

@ riffer: nice use of 'corps' instead of the phonetic 'core.' it's nice to know there's someone else out there who uses the right one.

lol. I've used "core" many times, thinking it was similar to how one would talk about a team having "a nice core group of young players."

The "right one" makes more sense, but I'll keep using the other one just to piss you off πŸ˜‰

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49985https://brownsboard.com/post/49985Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:17:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:56:13 GMT]]>I wouldn't be surprised if T.O. doesn't even make through training camp with the Bills.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49983https://brownsboard.com/post/49983Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:56:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:16:31 GMT]]>

@nickers said:

I find this signing rather Ironic only because when I think of Marv Levy and Dick Jauron..."OLD SCHOOL" comes to mind in general philosophy in how football operations is done and...played...Or Marv is drinking from the same water well as Al Davis...It makes absolutely noooo sense....I just cant see Levy wanting to deal with a head case of Owens' Ilk....

Marv Levy stepped down as GM of the Bills when his 2 year contract expired after the 2007 season.

-Al

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49975https://brownsboard.com/post/49975Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:16:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:16:31 GMT]]>I find this signing rather Ironic only because when I think of Marv Levy and Dick Jauron..."OLD SCHOOL" comes to mind in general philosophy in how football operations is done and...played...Or Marv is drinking from the same water well as Al Davis...It makes absolutely noooo sense....I just cant see Levy wanting to deal with a head case of Owens' Ilk....

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49964https://brownsboard.com/post/49964Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:16:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:43:27 GMT]]>let's hope, since the bills are on our schedule, that the game against them is either in the first two to four, while marshawn lynch is suspended, or in the last four to six, when the team will have completely imploded. if we get them in the middle eight, when there's still a chance that things will go well for them, when it looks like they might have a shot at the playoffs, and when owens is still somewhat in his 'good terrell' mode, they'll likely tear us to shreds. we don't have the secondary to hang with owens and evans.

@ riffer: nice use of 'corps' instead of the phonetic 'core.' it's nice to know there's someone else out there who uses the right one.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49961https://brownsboard.com/post/49961Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:43:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:56:30 GMT]]>That's a baffling move for all involved. When I think of TO, I think of a guy who needs, at this point in his career, to latch on to a team that has a shot at winning--kind of like Randy Moss. Do the Bills still have Dick Jauron? Checkmate. And why would the Bills--who have a reasonably young starter--sign a known QB-killer and locker room cancer like Owens? Who is going to put him in his place in the locker room--Trent Edwards? Marshawn Lynch?

Terrible move. The Patriots are a team that might be able to make an Owens deal work for them. Maybe the Giants. That's about it.

Dennis

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49952https://brownsboard.com/post/49952Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:56:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:51:32 GMT]]>Of all the places I would have thought TO could end up in this is right near the bottom.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49951https://brownsboard.com/post/49951Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:51:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:28:41 GMT]]>Holy crap, think they'll miss Royal?

That's a nice corps of Evans and Owens.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49944https://brownsboard.com/post/49944Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:28:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:29:54 GMT]]>You know, when I'm looking for a head coach who can handle TO, I immediately think of Dick Jauron πŸ˜›

I was planning on giving Jeremy Maclin to Buffalo in my mock draft, but this probably changes that. Linebacker seems to be a more likely choice. DE & TE are two other possibilities.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49942https://brownsboard.com/post/49942Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:29:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:28:08 GMT]]>

mz. said:

wowmy thoughts exactly....never saw that one coming. Maybe one of our guys will crank 'em good when we play them this year.]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49941https://brownsboard.com/post/49941Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:28:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:19:48 GMT]]>wow

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49938https://brownsboard.com/post/49938Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:19:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:07:37 GMT]]> T.O. agrees to one-year deal with Bills

The Buffalo Bills and free agent wide receiver Terrell Owens have reached agreement on a one-year contract. There will be a press conference at 6:15 p.m. ET at the team’s headquarters.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49936https://brownsboard.com/post/49936Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:07:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:21:19 GMT]]>Now that the cowboys released T.O. and have plenty of depth at running back how about Edwards for Marion Barber?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49237https://brownsboard.com/post/49237Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:21:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:13:04 GMT]]>well we all know that al davis would offer him a contract. it would probably be in the range of 10 years for $20 million a game. seriously though, the raiders will probably make an offer, but to will probably decline because it is oakland

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49230https://brownsboard.com/post/49230Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:13:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:00:16 GMT]]>The Redskins or Bucs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49185https://brownsboard.com/post/49185Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:00:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:57:17 GMT]]>

AdaM said:

Saints have roddy white, they arent interested in TO.

the Falcons have Roddy White.

But the Saints STILL wouldn't be interested. πŸ™‚

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49179https://brownsboard.com/post/49179Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:57:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:05:35 GMT]]>Well, count the Browns out:

BROWNS ARE OUT OF THE T.O. CHASE

Posted by Mike Florio on March 5, 2009, 1:08 p.m.

And another one joins the β€œwe don’t want T.O.” parade.

The latest team to join the Anti-T.O. list, per our own John Taylor of CFT, is the Cleveland Browns.

J.T. also writes for The Orange and Brown Report, and regularly covers the Browns.

Yahooo!!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49120https://brownsboard.com/post/49120Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:05:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:04:00 GMT]]>

@clevelandfanforlife said:

my vote goes to the saints. they have a qb who can throw to anyone and do well in any offense. no matter who he signs with, he shouldn't be given a contract longer than 2 years. anyone who signs him to anything longer than that should be drug out back and shot.

Saints have roddy white, they arent interested in TO.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49119https://brownsboard.com/post/49119Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:04:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:57:08 GMT]]>my vote goes to the saints. they have a qb who can throw to anyone and do well in any offense. no matter who he signs with, he shouldn't be given a contract longer than 2 years. anyone who signs him to anything longer than that should be drug out back and shot.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49115https://brownsboard.com/post/49115Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:57:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to T.O. released on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:55:34 GMT]]>this is something worth taking bets on.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/49114https://brownsboard.com/post/49114Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:55:34 GMT