<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[STAFFORD]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>if he's there at 5 what do you do?</p>

<p>
what do you think of him?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3563/stafford</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:29:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/3563.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:33:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:17:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/squintz" aria-label="Profile: squintz">@<bdi>squintz</bdi></a> <a href="/post/51281">said</a>:</p>Sporting News has the Browns picking Stafford at #5 in the magazine issue I just got.  Page 49 under the title 'Expect the unexpected when draft day arrives".  They say they spotted three first round curveballs, listed as:
<p>
<span style="color:#0000FF">1) The Lions should <i>not</i> take a qb at no. 1.  Their roster is full of holes, and a young QB could be ruined there (see David Carr in Houston and Tim Couch in Cleveland).  A left tackle or pass rusher would be a better choice.  </span></p>
<p>
The pick: Everette Brown, DE, Fla St.</p>

<p>
2) The Browns <i>will</i> draft a QB at No. 5.  New GM George Kokinis and new coach Eric Mangini don't like Brady Quinn <i>or</i> Derek Anderson and have put them both on the trading block.</p>
<p>
The pick:  Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia</p>

<p>
3) The Chargers need a running back.  LT will turn 30 in June and Darren Sproles is too small to be a feature back, so the team will take Chris Wells or Knowshon Moreno at No. 16.</p>
<p>
The pick: Beanie Wells</p>

<p>
Kind of crazy.  I would HATE this pick.  Of course, it also would depend on what they got in return for Quinn and Anderson, but I'm guessing the value wouldn't be equal....</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
On the surface it seems like a bad idea-  but the draft picks for quinn and Da- talk about rebuilding, they might have to lower ticket prices for a year- down to the price of a college game anyway.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51378</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51378</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hammertime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:17:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:31:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sporting News has the Browns picking Stafford at #5 in the magazine issue I just got.  Page 49 under the title 'Expect the unexpected when draft day arrives".  They say they spotted three first round curveballs, listed as:</p>

<p>
<span style="color:#0000FF">1) The Lions should <i>not</i> take a qb at no. 1.  Their roster is full of holes, and a young QB could be ruined there (see David Carr in Houston and Tim Couch in Cleveland).  A left tackle or pass rusher would be a better choice.  </span></p>
<p>
The pick: Everette Brown, DE, Fla St.</p>

<p>
2) The Browns <i>will</i> draft a QB at No. 5.  New GM George Kokinis and new coach Eric Mangini don't like Brady Quinn <i>or</i> Derek Anderson and have put them both on the trading block.</p>
<p>
The pick:  Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia</p>

<p>
3) The Chargers need a running back.  LT will turn 30 in June and Darren Sproles is too small to be a feature back, so the team will take Chris Wells or Knowshon Moreno at No. 16.</p>
<p>
The pick: Beanie Wells</p>

<p>
Kind of crazy.  I would HATE this pick.  Of course, it also would depend on what they got in return for Quinn and Anderson, but I'm guessing the value wouldn't be equal....</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51281</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51281</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Squintz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:31:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:30:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>dumb idea, what if no one offers a trade then we are stuck with 3 qb's, that are potential starters. a two way qb battle is bad enough at times, i want a three way but not this type of three way!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51280</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51280</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[plumcrazy73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:30:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:54:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This is the time of year I believe nothing I read or hear , and only half of what I see . It is getting crazy <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f914.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--thinking_face" title=":thinking_face:" alt="🤔" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51272</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51272</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[NewEraDawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:54:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:47:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hammertime" aria-label="Profile: hammertime">@<bdi>hammertime</bdi></a> <a href="/post/51111">said</a>:</p>Its amazing how a guy touted as the #1 pick is starting to fall out of the top ten.
<p>
He must have a great pr firm to garner this much hype.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
Probably the same firm Brady hired.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51270</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51270</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ballpeen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:47:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:44:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The hype machine has its flaws.</p>

<p>
I realize he's not a true #1 for everyone, but its interesting to see all the draft experts backing off their original mock #1</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51252</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51252</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hammertime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:44:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:38:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I dont think that ManKok is really interested, the rumors may be for draft positioning trying to create an intrest for a possible trade.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51250</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51250</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:38:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:26:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>He's only at #1 if someone values him there, and I don't think a lot of people do. So I won't be surprised if he's there at #5 at all because he's not one of the top four players in the draft. </p>

<p>
And then we offer a trade down, or let him slide on by to where he should be picked - somewhere between #10 and #17. </p>

<p>
But that's just my opinion.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51131</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51131</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[heckofajobbrownie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:26:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:55:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hammertime" aria-label="Profile: hammertime">@<bdi>hammertime</bdi></a> <a href="/post/51111">said</a>:</p>Its amazing how a guy touted as the #1 pick is starting to fall out of the top ten.
<p>
He must have a great pr firm to garner this much hype.</p>
</blockquote>



<p>
The reason he's falling is because he's a Junior for 1, which have a horrible track record for success in the NFL.</p>

<p>
His TD/INT ratio is bad which directly translates to nfl production.</p>

<p>
He had a beast RB and two beast receivers to throw to, and still had a mediocre completion %.</p>


<p>
He has the tools to be a good QB but he's at least a 2 or 3 years bench guy before he has that ability.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51113</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51113</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AdaM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:55:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:49:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Its amazing how a guy touted as the #1 pick is starting to fall out of the top ten.</p>

<p>
He must have a great pr firm to garner this much hype.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51111</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51111</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hammertime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:49:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to STAFFORD on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:36:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>the only thing i'd do with stafford is use him as trade bait. he's got bust written all over him: low completion %, bad TD to INT ratio, good weapons around him that he didn't properly involve.</p>

<p>
if he's there at five and we can dupe some team into trading for him, he'd have contributed more to us than he ever would to them.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/51109</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/51109</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JewDago]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:36:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>