<![CDATA[Seahawks trade Julian Peterson]]>ESPN has the story.

draft implications: curry's completely gone. all four teams in front of us could use him. this move, however, makes it more likely that raji would fall to us. seattle had a gaping need for a DT, but with redding in the fold, and his large salary accompanying him, it makes it far more likely that seattle won't want to invest more money at DT and instead focus on their pressing needs at pass rusher, o-line, or finding a franchise QB to replace hasselbeck.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3616/seahawks-trade-julian-petersonRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 13:55:29 GMTSat, 14 Mar 2009 23:18:16 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:27:01 GMT]]>no worries. it got pushed out by stallworth. it's just an internet football board, after all.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52657https://brownsboard.com/post/52657Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:27:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:22:40 GMT]]>sorry bro...didn't see your thread.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52654https://brownsboard.com/post/52654Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:22:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:47:20 GMT]]>

@jewdago said:

ESPN has the story.

draft implications: curry's completely gone. all four teams in front of us could use him. this move, however, makes it more likely that raji would fall to us. seattle had a gaping need for a DT, but with redding in the fold, and his large salary accompanying him, it makes it far more likely that seattle won't want to invest more money at DT and instead focus on their pressing needs at pass rusher, o-line, or finding a franchise QB to replace hasselbeck.

Yeah right JD, Seattle has Senaca Wallace, yesterday's Pat White.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52625https://brownsboard.com/post/52625Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:47:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:33:41 GMT]]>there's always some nerd who's got nothing better to do than report useless information like it really matters.

dammit.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52615https://brownsboard.com/post/52615Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:33:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:13:22 GMT]]>

@solon16 said:

Trade happened Saturday dude....sorry I'm not on the computer 24-7!

you should be. 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52560https://brownsboard.com/post/52560Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:13:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:12:18 GMT]]>

@clevelandfanforlife said:

yeah someone posted this last week when the trade actually happened. this isn't even close to being considered news

Trade happened Saturday dude....sorry I'm not on the computer 24-7!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52558https://brownsboard.com/post/52558Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:12:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:39:19 GMT]]>yeah someone posted this last week when the trade actually happened. this isn't even close to being considered news

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52522https://brownsboard.com/post/52522Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:39:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:37:19 GMT]]>Just took us out of the Curry sweepstakes for good.... to me seattle will now take Curry if KC doesn't! Crabtree a close second for the hawks

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52516https://brownsboard.com/post/52516Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:37:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seahawks trade Julian Peterson on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:21:50 GMT]]>Well put, JD. My sentiments exactly.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/52001https://brownsboard.com/post/52001Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:21:50 GMT