<![CDATA[McCoy, Nicks not making money]]>According to one report, Pitt's LeSean McCoy had a very disappointing pro day, running his 40 in the 4.5's and posting a 28" vertical. He was said to be visibly upset with his performance.

North Carolina's Hakeem Nicks raised some serious red flags by showing up to his pro day 10-15 pounds heavier than the svelte 212 lbs. he weighed at the Combine. He then tweaked his hamstring during receiving drills, so he wasn't able to run a 40.

Apparently, the Browns are very interested in one of Nicks' teammates, TE Richard Quinn. The Browns took him out to lunch after he posted a respectable 4.79-4.85 40 and a 7.10 3-cone. Quinn is a Day 2 blocking TE who's also drawn heavy interest from the Broncos and Jets.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3659/mccoy-nicks-not-making-moneyRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 12:59:36 GMTTue, 17 Mar 2009 20:18:24 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to McCoy, Nicks not making money on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:32:54 GMT]]>Maurice Clarrett 2.0???

Id stay far away from him. Big ego + poor work ethic= bust.

Even if he ends up being a decent back Id rather not waste a second for this guy when we have so many holes.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/53680https://brownsboard.com/post/53680Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:32:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to McCoy, Nicks not making money on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:39:18 GMT]]>Think Shonn Greene falls to 50?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/53429https://brownsboard.com/post/53429Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:39:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to McCoy, Nicks not making money on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:37:56 GMT]]>

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Wow. Very disappointing for Nicks.

Yeah; he dispels concerns about his speed by running a 4.49 at the combine, then brings 'em back by making scouts wonder whether he's a mini-Mike Williams. Not a smart move.

Speaking of not so smart moves, people are now seriously questioning McCoy's decision to declare for this year's draft. Apparently, he has a very undeveloped upper body and is a little bit arrogant & immature. He's the kind of guy who may not be ready to be a significant contributor his rookie year and very well could end up busting.

It looks like he'll be there at #36, but I'm not sure he's worth the risk.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/53363https://brownsboard.com/post/53363Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:37:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to McCoy, Nicks not making money on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:04:54 GMT]]>Wow. Very disappointing for Nicks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/53214https://brownsboard.com/post/53214Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:04:54 GMT