@clevfan4life said:

A) He's not my hero and you got me I haven't really figured it out either.

Interesting...you've never struggled at making up stuff before.

@clevfan4life said:

C) I really don't give a fuck. It doesn't haunt me on a daily basis. These are the ponderings of lesser minds, not mine..

Right... it haunts me on a daily basis, being that I forgot all about it until you mentioned "Nobel", but go ahead with your ad-hominem attacks...I don't expect anything more from you libtards.

Stuart said:

A) He's not my hero and you got me I haven't really figured it out either. C) I really don't give a fuck. It doesn't haunt me on a daily basis. These are the ponderings of lesser minds, not mine.

@legacy-fan said:

If i'm "simple", that makes you a single celled organism. That's how vastly over you I am. There's chimpanzees out there right now having sign language conversations with people that would blow your wee little minds.

@clevfan4life said:

well........yeah...........what could possibly be your point? they're the two greatest words in the English language and the first person who figured out to put them next to each other should have gotten a nobel. I really don't see your point, were you trying to make one?

Speaking of the Nobel, what exactly did your hero Obama do to earn the Nobel Peace Prize?

No one has been able to figure that out yet.

@legacy-fan said:

well........yeah...........what could possibly be your point? they're the two greatest words in the English language and the first person who figured out to put them next to each other should have gotten a nobel. I really don't see your point, were you trying to make one?

@clevfan4life said:

Frankly i'm running out of words that adequately describe your level of stupidity. All serious I've reached the limits of my vocab cause profoundly dumb and stupid doesn't start to corral it.

Awww poor Cleve. Im surprised because libs never seem to have trouble with name calling.

Try Googling a thesaurus then.

@clevfan4life said:

Frankly i'm running out of words that adequately describe your level of stupidity. All serious I've reached the limits of my vocab cause profoundly dumb and stupid doesn't start to corral it.

Considering that "ngr" and "fgt" are the bookends to your vocabulary, I'm not the least bit surprised.

Stuart said:

Frankly i'm running out of words that adequately describe your level of stupidity. All serious I've reached the limits of my vocab cause profoundly dumb and stupid doesn't start to corral it.

@clevfan4life said:

way to call out my smart phone touchscreen typo...you really got me. Damn that phone, dammit it to hell.

lmfao

He didn't call out your smart phone dummy. He said he tried looking the word up in case you missed it.

@calfoxwc said:

way to call out my smart phone touchscreen typo...you really got me. Damn that phone, dammit it to hell.

lmfao

None of these are provided with context.

Hitler could have also told the Germans to eat more vegetables and get a full night of sleep. I don't think anyone should have still listened to him as a whole.

(No, I don't think Beck is Hitler... calm down).

Stuart said:

I can't remember if I expected you to get it right or not, I thought maybe you'd do yourself a solid and "unignorant" yourself. THat was probably a bad job out of me

@mld-woody said:

Happy?

Um Woody, you said nobody should listen to Beck.

While I appreciate your effort, all I really wanted you to do is after reading the quotes if you still thought Beck was a lunatic and not to be listened to. Well?

Btw, there is no such thing as "social justice", the term makes no sense. Its just more made up liberal bullshit.

Stuart said:

ugh

Sure?

If we were in trouble, ya.

True

I don't know the problem

Sure

Sure, though I can only imagine what he is referring to...

In a way, i guess

Sure

If he wants them too

I disagree

Sure

I'd need more context

Idk what he is panicking about here

Sure?

Disagree?

Music? what?

I wonder what he considers social justice

Repeat

Not really

Not necessarily

Depends on how you define some rights

No

as do most people...

Happy?

Again, without the context of most of those quotes, it doesn't mean much. I imagine if I had the context, I'd disagree with most of them.

@mld-woody said:

oh god, all of them?

If you want to help, give me the context for all of those statements. I might agree with a statement, but be defining words completely differently than Beck. Like "problem", "social justice" "legitimate" etc etc etc

I'm going to bed now. Maybe tomorrow.

Yeah, I thought so.

@mld-woody said:

I didn't vote for Obama.

You blame him for literally everything bad

And Obama never blames himself for anything that goes bad.

No buck has ever stopped at that assholes desk and you know it Woody.

@calfoxwc said:

I had to go look up "indiltrate". Got nothin. Maybe we can start making it a political forum word for

"one who tries to sound literate, but fails miserably because he emotionally knee jerks and can't spell"

Liberals often use words they don't know the meaning of. Clev trying to be articulate makes him feel smart.

@clevfan4life said:

what u prove tirelessly is that u dont understand people. U have zero depth of perpective. U are literally a two dimensional being that has managed to indiltrate the 3rd dimension but is still profoundly uncomfortable there. I cant stand some of the tenets of islam....but i also explicitly understand what 1800 years of brainwashing generations under the made up god of abraham has accomplished. Bur there was a time when the middle east didnt give a fuck about us and what we did or anybody else.\

Can u tell me what happened in the early to mid 1900's that changed that?

Its actually more than one thing but im curious if u csn rouse ur intellect for a brief walk in the sun

I can certainly tell you what you want to hear libfuck...that what happened in the early to mid 1900's was all Americas fault...and centuries before the 1900's it was the Crusades. Happy?

Now that we got that out of the way...please clarify what you mean about we wanting to "start" a "religious" war?...or was that just another misspeak by you?

As a flaming liberal it's your oozing compassion that has become tiresome, you continue to dismiss responsibility and accountability and place blame elsewhere.. from the micro to the macro.....yes, those baby mammas popping out 15 children being "societies fault", to Islamic terrorism being the fault of America.. you know, "The Great Satan".

Oh gee how could I forget...and slavery is the reason for the plight of black people in 2015.

That's probably right in line with what we did to the Arabs in 1900, am I in the ballpark Cleve?

"one who tries to sound literate, but fails miserably because he emotionally knee jerks and can't spell"

Stuart said:

Who are you talking to? Yourself? Must be, because that's something you made up in your head. The 3 posts before you made no mention of wishing to start a " global religious war". The religious war has already begun bozo, and it wasn't started by us. That almost made lol...so simply by not "antagonizing", Islamists will behave themselves, pack up and go home? I see.Just to enlighten you a little... Islamists have been antagonized way before the first cartoon of the Prophet was put on paper. They are antagonized by the western way of life, they are antagonized by Christianity, they are antagonized because Islam is the only religion that should exist. They are antagonized because we let gay people walk the streets, they are antagonized by Hollywood, and Wall Street (got something in common with libs) they are antagonized by the immorality of liberals, they are antagonized by the righteousness of conservatives.. Get a clue...they want you dead. Seems not all is lost in your post, you've managed to arrive at something doable.Any nation in the west that allows muslim immigration is signing its own death warrant, allowing in the first germs of the disease that will eventually destroy it.