NOT

woody and cleve

@mld-woody said:

Nothing vague about it:

Matthew 19:4

4 He answered, "Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, 'Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'?

Former president Jimmy Carter said on Tuesday that he believes Jesus would approve of gay marriage, though he said that he doesn’t have “any verse in scripture” to corroborate this notion.

“I believe he would. I believe Jesus would. I don’t have any verse in scripture…” Carter responded when asked by HuffPo Live host Mark Lamont Hill whether Christ would embrace same-sex nuptials. “I believe that Jesus would approve of gay marriage, but I’m not – that’s just my own personal belief.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/07/jimmy-carter-says-he-believes-jesus-would-approve-of-gay-marriage-but-even-he-makes-a-big-admission-about-that-claim/

All we will know or ever know in this life about Jesus will be found in the bible. There is no other way. Outside the bible everybody can have their own ideas about who Jesus is. You end up with Jesus whomever you want Him to be. I know a vegan who believes Jesus had to be a vegetarian because there is no possible way He could eat meat. Yet a quick knowledge of the bible shows the passover meal that Jesus and the disciples ate was not a vegan menu but lamb was the main course. Other scriptures show where fish was on the menu. So now Jimmy Carter just "knows" Jesus would approve of gay marriage (like the gal who just "knows" Jesus was a vegan) but cannot give one scripture to back that up however in the bible Jesus Himself says marriage is between one man and one woman.

@diehardbrownsfan said:

Chic-fila-a is introducing a mayonaise filled footlong chicken dog to commemorate the event........

They truly have learned they can corner all markets.

Not that I'm for it.

@calfoxwc said:

I was never against civil unions, on this board.

You can call civil unions "binkieboo", whatever.

Just don't call it marriage. It is not. Right now, I think the liberal

"okay, you can have freedom of religion and speech, but expect consequences"

And it is going to bounce right back at them for this belligerent militancy by gays forcing the issue.

Liberal mantra - "live and let live, and we get to decide who gets to...."

No talk of the high divorce rated amongst heterosexual couples. No talk of infidelity that plagues straight unions at a reported rate more disproportionate than gay couples. Not even really making mention how marriage for the bulk of human history has been little more than a business contract that promised a dowry and a son.

Part of me wanted marriage equality so I could enjoy the false rage that comes from a lot of the right wing on this issue.

Also, if civil unions were to have the same rights as marriage, yet for gay couples - then what's the point of calling it anything else? Nobody is going to say to their family were 'civilly unioned"

So by wanting to call it something other than what it really is would be just using smoke and mirrors to make yourself feel better about the topic. A true cosmetic approach.

That aside, This Is Still Wrong. I have a couple of gay friends and family members that are wonderful people who wouldn't even begin go consider this type of action. My hope is that this is simply a con by a gay couple for the sake of being money hungry and not a representation of the community at large.

You can call civil unions "binkieboo", whatever.

Just don't call it marriage. It is not. Right now, I think the liberal

"okay, you can have freedom of religion and speech, but expect consequences"

And it is going to bounce right back at them for this belligerent militancy by gays forcing the issue.

Liberal mantra - "live and let live, and we get to decide who gets to...."

If someone doesn't want to accept my money, so be it. I leave and move on to another business.

I'm all for marriage equality but this is.... wrong.

@fairhooker11 said:

and scene....

Yeah that funny. I like when he asks "what else would you throw? And the guys like "I don't know. Couscous? Skittles?"

@clevfan4life said:

Your life is pointless, want me to expand on that? I can. I'm here for you bro. You can always count on me to expand ad infinitum to you how useless, meaningless and pointless your existence is.

Still mad because I said you remind me of Michael Moore?lol

But yes please feel free to expand!...interested to hear from one who recently found meaning to his life by trolling all day on this message board.

Stuart said:

Cleve must be a busy guy what with his being the person who said all of those things during press conferences.

As a general rule, any politician that says "a war on (insert something)" is generally just trying to make their opponents look like assholes when really it should only be used in a sentence like "we declared a war on (insert country)".

@clevfan4life said:

I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.

"Oppressed"? Awwwww...are being overcome by those touchy feely compassionate liberal emotions again Cleve?

I agree however... those "heterosexual only" drinking fountains gotta go.

@clevfan4life said:

I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.

Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?

@clevfan4life said:

I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.

@the-cysko-kid said:

i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure