<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to the radio the other day and they were joking about our drafts with Farmer. They were saying this is a guy who will find a super deal at a flea market on something obscure but would walk by the Hope Diamond on sale for $100. </p>

<p>The joking is obviously based on the fact he and / or the scouting staff seem to have a real knack of finding gems in the later rounds. You have to admit they have found some gems in the later rounds and undrafted. Based on this the new strategy is so obvious I cannot believe we havent used it already. We trade all of our picks in the first three rounds to accumulate a shit ton of 5 to 7th rounders. We draft ALL obscure super secret prospects and BAM we are good to go. just sayin...............</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/37866/browns-draft-strategy-beginning-in-2016</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 03:36:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/37866.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:52:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:46:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">I'll respect you opinion on this Tour- but it sure looks like teams aren't respecting the Browns ability to beat them deep, and crowding the line. On paper, we had the superior line to the Chargers, but it sure looked like McCown was under far more duress than Rivers. Hoorta</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">**************************************</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">  This is what I keep seeing. I mean, Andy Dalton is no "elite qb". But look at the</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">talent they have on offense.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40)">Look at the Packers' offense. Rodgers is struggling. But look at their wr's on the injury report:</span></p>

<p>Davante Adams - Questionable</p>
<p>Randall Cobb - Probable</p>
<p>James Jones -Probable</p>

<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">Aaron Rodgers:</p>
<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">"I think, is a Pro Bowl-caliber player. Without him and Jordy, we have to find somebody who can attack the outside. We didn’t sustain drives,” </p>

<p><a href="http://prod.www.packers.clubs.nfl.com/news-and-events/article-game-editorial/article-1/Aaron-Rodgers-confirms-offenses-struggles/f4e79b82-e5ae-4e87-8052-e4a365c72bce" rel="external nofollow">http://prod.www.packers.clubs.nfl.com/news-and-events/article-game-editorial/article-1/Aaron-Rodgers-confirms-offenses-struggles/f4e79b82-e5ae-4e87-8052-e4a365c72bce</a></p>

<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">It’s especially nice the Packers defense played as well as it did on Sunday, otherwise this one might be in the loss column. The stats accurately portray the Packers’ struggles on offense.</p>
<ul><li>Eighty-six yards rushing.</li>
<li>Four of 13 on third down.</li>
<li>Three giveaways, which included two Rodgers interceptions and a Rodgers fumble.</li>
<li>An 82.8 passer rating, which is satisfactory for a lot of quarterbacks; Rodgers, however, is the best quarterback.</li>
</ul>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/539706</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/539706</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:46:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:50:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Take Bosa.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/539683</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/539683</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:50:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:00:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Thought I'd bump this as we lost yesterday! </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/539655</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/539655</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[chimpy07]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:00:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:38:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>h,</p>
<p>
I've been doing the box counts, but not recording the play results. Easy enough to do...</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536357</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536357</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:38:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:20:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/536201">said</a>:</p><div><p>Spreading the ball around too much?</p></div></blockquote>

<p>When Barnidge and Johnson are your #2 &amp; #3 in receptions, we have a problem. Benjamin is the only one of the group that is (hardly) putting a scare in the opposition. 16\4= 4 receptions per game.</p>

<p>I'm waiting for that big-time Bowe breakout game- he hasn't caught a pass yet- but his bank account caught a flood of Benjamins- of the Franklin variety, not Travis. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=00a0b17bbb1" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></p>

<p>"Free Josh Gordon", except I doubt McCown could get him the ball on fly routes. I'll respect you opinion on this Tour- but it sure looks like teams aren't respecting the Browns ability to beat them deep, and crowding the line. On paper, we had the superior line to the Chargers, but it sure looked like McCown was under far more duress than Rivers. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536347</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536347</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:20:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:08:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<div>Teams don't win championships without a quality passing game.  Authentic football is not, and hasn't been since Nixon resigned, about the running game. Here are the adjusted [100 is league average] passer ratings for the SB winning QB:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2014: Brady 111 [Obviously misleadingly low]</div>
<div>2013: Wilson 119</div>
<div>2012: Flacco 103, 9 Y/A 0 INT in postseason</div>
<div>2011: Eli 111</div>
<div>2010: Rodgers 124</div>
<div>2009: Brees 132</div>
<div>2008: Roethlisberger 97 (Lifetime 112)</div>
<div>2007: Eli 89 (Over 100 6 of next 7 years)</div>
<div>2006: Peyton 126</div>
<div>2005: Roethlisberger 122</div>
<div>2004: Brady 114</div>
<div>2003: Brady 107</div>
<div>2002: Johnson 121</div>
<div>2001: Brady 111</div>
<div>
<div>2000: Dilfer 98</div>
<div>1999: Warner 136</div>
<div>1998: Elway 119</div>
<div>1997: Elway 113</div>
<div>1996: Favre 130</div>
<div>1995: Aikman 122</div>
<div>1994: Young 147</div>
<div>1993: Aikman 129</div>
<div>1992: Aikman 118</div>
<div>1991: Rypien 130</div>
<div>1990: Hostetler 110</div>
<div>1989: Montana 149</div>
<div>1988: Montana 117</div>
<div>1987: Williams 126</div>
<div>1986: Simms 100</div>
<div>1985: McMahon 111</div>
<div>1984: Montana 134</div>
<div>1983: Plunkett 109</div>
<div>1982: Theismann 122</div>
<div>1981: Montana 122</div>
<div>1980: Plunkett 101</div>
<div>1979: Bradshaw 110</div>
<div>1978: Bradshaw 126</div>
<div>1977: Staubach 125</div>
<div>1976: Stabler 140</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The 2007 Giants are probably the closest to the anecdotal case for ground-and-pound fetishists — Eli wasn’t very good for much of the regular season, and that team had a really good running game. But by the playoffs, Eli had transformed into the not great but solidly above-average QB he’s generally been ever since. And, more to the point, the Giants — who outscored their opposition by about 20 points in the regular season — are almost certainly the weakest Super Bowl team ever. Flags fly forever and they beat perhaps the greatest team ever assembled and more power to them, but if your strategy for building a championship team is “build a .500 team and have it overachieve in the regular season and get hot at the right time and win 3 straight coin-flip playoff games against significantly better teams,” well…good luck with that.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The marginal quality of your running game isn’t terribly important, and you don’t need to invest in an expensive running back to get a good enough running game.</div>
</div>
<p>No question that you need a good defense.  But the one constant for SB winners is a great passing game -- without that, nothing else matters.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536246</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536246</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unsympathetic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:08:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 03:53:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/unsympathetic" aria-label="Profile: unsympathetic">@<bdi>unsympathetic</bdi></a> <a href="/post/536173">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Since the Nixon administration, there is exactly one case of a Super Bowl being won by a team with a below-average QB having a below-average season: the 2000 Ravens.  </span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Super Bowls are most commonly won by great QBs, and with very few exceptions the rest are won by really good ones. Some Super Bowl teams have very good running games, some have mediocre ones, and some have really bad ones. Some teams cited for the idea that you can with an offense based around a great running game rather than efficient passing actually prove the opposite. The 2003 Buccaneers were horribly led</span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)"> by Michael Pittman’s 3.5 yards a carry. The 1990 Giants also had a replacement-level running game and an efficient passing game.  The Patriots had a mediocre running game in 2001 and a terrible one in 2003.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">It’s not complicated. The NFL is completely dominated by pass offense and pass defense and has been for a loooong time. The marginal quality of your running game isn’t terribly important, and you don’t need to invest in an expensive running back to get a good enough running game.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">A great quarterback and a below-average running game is a great offense. Barry Sanders and a mediocre quarterback is a mediocre offense.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Draft a QB and receivers and stop the insanity.</span></p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>One could argue that the 2012 season with Flacco (given his performance before and subsequently after the superbowl run is average with blips of good play here and there) could be thrown in with Dilfer.  </p>

<p>It's possible Russell Wilson could be listed in this category.    He's still yet to win a game as a QB when the Seahawks defense surrenders 24points.     Who drives the ship there?</p>

<p>To address a few points. </p>

<p>-  The 2003 Bucs had a GARBAGE offensive line.  </p>
<p>-  The Pats running game in 2001 wasn't bad at all.   Their defense was their hallmark</p>
<p>-  The Pats running game in 03 was solid as well.   Unless you've forgotten Rudi Johnson came in for Dillon after injury?  Rudi averaged over 4ypc.   So their running games and passing concepts very much complimented one another.   Toss in having the leagues leading scoring defense, and that's what you get. </p>

<p>Keep in mind, while Peyton and the Colts were on the way to rewriting record books in 04 - they still couldn't get by New England and their balanced attack.  Likewise in 2007 being a passing dominated team, the Pats fell short of the prize to the G-men and their defensive front/running game.</p>

<p>My theme is this -  There is more than one way to skin a cat.    In absence of having the HOF field general, teams have successfully fielded competitive squads with augmented rushing attacks, PAP, and great defenses.   That's what allowed the Niners resurgence, Kansas City to make the playoffs, Cincy to look like a current contender, The Texans to rise from the ashes of 'expansion disaster', The Hawks to finally get over the hump, allowed the Steelers to claim a Superbowl with a sophomore QB and many other examples. </p>


<p>Finding that sure thing at QB might be the most rare hit in ANY sport, save for perhaps a perfect game.     It's much more logical to take the opposite approach lest you end up with the Blaine Gabberts, Jaemis Winstons, Brandon Weedens, etc etc. </p>

<p>In closing, our QB was more than good enough to win today.      A lack of discipline leading to penalties, defensive inconsistency and a couple ticky tack calls(non calls) were the culprits. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536226</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536226</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tiamat63]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 03:53:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 03:05:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/536164">said</a>:</p><p>The problem is obvious.</p></blockquote>
<p>
Spreading the ball around too much?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536201</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536201</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 03:05:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:34:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/unsympathetic" aria-label="Profile: unsympathetic">@<bdi>unsympathetic</bdi></a> <a href="/post/536173">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Since the Nixon administration, there is exactly one case of a Super Bowl being won by a team with a below-average QB having a below-average season: the 2000 Ravens.  </span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Super Bowls are most commonly won by great QBs, and with very few exceptions the rest are won by really good ones. Some Super Bowl teams have very good running games, some have mediocre ones, and some have really bad ones. Some teams cited for the idea that you can with an offense based around a great running game rather than efficient passing actually prove the opposite. The 2003 Buccaneers were horribly led</span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)"> by Michael Pittman’s 3.5 yards a carry. The 1990 Giants also had a replacement-level running game and an efficient passing game.  The Patriots had a mediocre running game in 2001 and a terrible one in 2003.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">It’s not complicated. The NFL is completely dominated by pass offense and pass defense and has been for a loooong time. The marginal quality of your running game isn’t terribly important, and you don’t need to invest in an expensive running back to get a good enough running game.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">A great quarterback and a below-average running game is a great offense. Barry Sanders and a mediocre quarterback is a mediocre offense.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Draft a QB and receivers and stop the insanity.</span></p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>Beginning to think that way. Jim Brown, Walter Payton, Barry Sanders, and Ladainian Tomlinson for all their collective greatness have exactly two Championships between the four of them.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536183</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536183</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:34:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:18:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Since the Nixon administration, there is exactly one case of a Super Bowl being won by a team with a below-average QB having a below-average season: the 2000 Ravens.  </span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Super Bowls are most commonly won by great QBs, and with very few exceptions the rest are won by really good ones. Some Super Bowl teams have very good running games, some have mediocre ones, and some have really bad ones. Some teams cited for the idea that you can with an offense based around a great running game rather than efficient passing actually prove the opposite. The 2003 Buccaneers were horribly led</span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)"> by Michael Pittman’s 3.5 yards a carry. The 1990 Giants also had a replacement-level running game and an efficient passing game.  The Patriots had a mediocre running game in 2001 and a terrible one in 2003.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">It’s not complicated. The NFL is completely dominated by pass offense and pass defense and has been for a loooong time. The marginal quality of your running game isn’t terribly important, and you don’t need to invest in an expensive running back to get a good enough running game.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">A great quarterback and a below-average running game is a great offense. Barry Sanders and a mediocre quarterback is a mediocre offense.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(252,251,225)">Draft a QB and receivers and stop the insanity.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536173</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536173</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unsympathetic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:18:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:00:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Zombo <a href="/post/527547">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>Hartline and Hawkins will both catch 70 balls. Hartline will be offensive MVP.</p>

<p>Z</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>Hartline- 8\123</p>
<p>Hawkins- 10\112</p>

<p>That will project to around 40\500</p>

<p>The problem is obvious.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536164</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536164</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:00:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:05:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/wargograw" aria-label="Profile: wargograw">@<bdi>wargograw</bdi></a> <a href="/post/536069">said</a>:</p><div><p>Perrine's legit, no doubt.</p></div></blockquote>
<p>Nice thing is he is sharing carries with Mixon which lightens his load and keeps him fresh.  If he stays healthy he'll be a beast in the NFL</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536088</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536088</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BaconHound]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:05:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:02:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>there is only one option for us at #1, which is very likely where we'll pick. We have to go BPA. No more drafting for need, that can happen in the later rounds. We have to start drafting talent, period. Right now that's Bosa to me. We need a big strong edge that can throw lineman off him and get around them with both strength and technique. That's Bosa. If Joey Bosa were to be put on this team "right now"....he might be one of the best run stoppers on the team and frankly might be the most polished pass rusher too save perhaps for Armonty.</p>

<p>I dunno, we've drafted talented pass rushers before but for some reason they don't really develop right. I have no explanation for that.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536083</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536083</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:02:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 23:56:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Perrine's legit, no doubt. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536069</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[wargograw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 23:56:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 23:33:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/baconhound" aria-label="Profile: baconhound">@<bdi>baconhound</bdi></a> <a href="/post/535985">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>Or Samaje Perine and skip the SEC all together</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>Big 12 Dumpster fire? Right. Valerie Perrine would be better for our O <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=00a0b17bbb1" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /> .</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/536032</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/536032</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 23:33:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 22:05:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/535960">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>Well you can wait another year and take Fornette (the next  Adrian Peterson) after the SEC shock wears off. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=00a0b17bbb1" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>Or Samaje Perine and skip the SEC all together</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535985</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BaconHound]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 22:05:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:32:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Add Malcolm Johnson and Bowe to that list lol!</p>

<p>Id probably take Elliot over Henry too. Henry looks a step slow. Destined for "plodder" status in the NFL after his initial shine wears off. He hasn't done a ton this year either but then, I realize they're asking him to play a limited role. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535973</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535973</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[wargograw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:32:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 19:58:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mudfly" aria-label="Profile: mudfly">@<bdi>mudfly</bdi></a> <a href="/post/535929">said</a>:</p><div><p>sec is not treating us well lately........Manziel, Mingo and Richardson......</p></div></blockquote>

<p>Well you can wait another year and take Fornette (the next  Adrian Peterson) after the SEC shock wears off. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=00a0b17bbb1" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535960</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 19:58:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 16:14:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/columbusking" aria-label="Profile: columbusking">@<bdi>columbusking</bdi></a> <a href="/post/535923">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>Not wanting to rule him out right away, but the Browns didn't have the best luck with the last RB we took from Bama....</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>sec is not treating us well lately........Manziel, Mingo and Richardson......</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535929</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mudfly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 16:14:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:58:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/535908">said</a>:</p><div><p>I think I would move Derrick Henry past Elliott as the top RB. At 6'3" 242 lbs. with power and speed he could help our running game set up the play action and get the tough yards inside.</p></div></blockquote>

<p>Not wanting to rule him out right away, but the Browns didn't have the best luck with the last RB we took from Bama....</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535923</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535923</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ColumbusKing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:58:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:15:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/535908">said</a>:</p><p>I think I would move Derrick Henry past Elliott as the top RB. At 6'3" 242 lbs. with power and speed he could help our running game set up the play action and get the tough yards inside.</p></blockquote>
<p>EzE is the superior pass catcher and off ball player.      In today's NFL, that means a lot. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535909</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535909</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tiamat63]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:15:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:14:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I think I would move Derrick Henry past Elliott as the top RB. At 6'3" 242 lbs. with power and speed he could help our running game set up the play action and get the tough yards inside.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/535908</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/535908</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:14:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:57:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/528819">said</a>:</p><p>Saw today that Todd McShay's first draft top 32 for 2016 has Cardale Jones @ #19. That would give the Browns a legit shot if it held up.</p></blockquote> <p>
Not seeing much chance of that based upon game 1. Kid doesn't act like he has a pulse.  </p>


<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/diehardbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: diehardbrownsfan">@<bdi>diehardbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/528837">said</a>:</p><p>I have no faith in McCown.  Can't see him lasting long.</p></blockquote>
<p>
He's not supposed to last long... </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/528951</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/528951</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:57:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Browns Draft Strategy beginning in 2016 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:59:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hack, Goff or C. Jones pick 1.Look at Treadwell from old miss, A Dez look alike or Williams from Clemson either pick 2. Early likes.. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/528901</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/528901</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:59:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>