<![CDATA[Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees]]>Liberal scientists... I figure, thought that would look good for "goober warning".

"global heat kills the earths trees crisis".

wait.

"oops, there's eh...a "little" more than we figured"....by ...er...trillions...

http://patriotoutdoornews.com/15240/scientists-undercount-trees-by-2-6-trillion-but-assure-us-animals-going-extinct

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/37932/scientists-admit-they-underestimated-the-number-of-treesRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:02:28 GMTTue, 08 Sep 2015 15:14:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:39:33 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Yes yes yes the numbers say the climate is changing. No disagreement from me. I would also guess that mankind might have something of an effect on that. How much and what can or will possibly be done about that? I have absolutely no idea nor do most of the people here despite the ongoing screaming match.

I'm just repeating my matter since you just recently joined the fracas.

(my gut feeling is that those who claim it isn't happening at all are just doing so to rattle the cages of the few who seemed to be hyperventilating over it 😉 )

WSS

That is kind of my stance and if there are alternatives to non-renewable energy sources that don't increase my bottom line significantly, give it a shot. CFCs were phased out and the economy didn't crumble

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528969https://brownsboard.com/post/528969Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:39:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:36:56 GMT]]>Mazda 3 & CX-5

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528968https://brownsboard.com/post/528968Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:36:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:42:58 GMT]]>old Silverado, 5.3 v8. Never fails. AC doesn't work anymore but.... I'll run it to about 250,000 miles.

few years old Ford Escape with a six. It's a fantastic car.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528707https://brownsboard.com/post/528707Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:42:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:33:48 GMT]]>GMC Sierra. 5.3L v8

'79 Cadillac coupe deville w/ the 425 big block.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528702https://brownsboard.com/post/528702Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:33:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:24:39 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

They have to pay for crumpets?

😉

Ironically he's probably not a liberal over there.

WSS

I'm fairly central. If you think I'm liberal - hell, if you think Bernie Sanders is liberal - you should check out the (likely) new leader of the Labour party, Jeremy Corbyn.

Either way, regardless of my views I get painted as a conservative because I have a good education and a high paid job.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528699https://brownsboard.com/post/528699Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:24:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:22:08 GMT]]>They have to pay for crumpets?

😉

Ironically he's probably not a liberal over there.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528697https://brownsboard.com/post/528697Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:22:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:14:39 GMT]]>now, now, Chris lives in England - and he's a lib, so he's entitled

to free transportation. On vacations, he walks down the cobblestone street,

and buys himself a crumpet.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528696https://brownsboard.com/post/528696Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:14:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:06:15 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

What kind of emergency?

MMGW

😁

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528692https://brownsboard.com/post/528692Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:06:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:04:14 GMT]]>What kind of emergency?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528691https://brownsboard.com/post/528691Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:04:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:02:16 GMT]]>I couldn't imagine living in a place without a car in case of emergency.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528690https://brownsboard.com/post/528690Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:02:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:56:53 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

And sneers at Americans who do!

😉

(Just kidding)

Not just Americans 😉

Seriously though, I don't own a car because I live in London. Everywhere I need to get to, I can. If I ever move out, I'd probably get a car, if I needed it, and I will happily rent a car when on holiday.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528683https://brownsboard.com/post/528683Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:56:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:56:30 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

I don't own a car.

Mommy won't let you?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528682https://brownsboard.com/post/528682Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:56:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:55:33 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

I don't own a car.

And sneers at Americans who do!

😉

(Just kidding)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528681https://brownsboard.com/post/528681Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:55:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:49:02 GMT]]>I don't own a car.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528676https://brownsboard.com/post/528676Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:49:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:27:11 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

2011 Outback premium here.

WSS

I have a 2014 Legacy "with a kick ass sound system" 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528666https://brownsboard.com/post/528666Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:27:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:19:35 GMT]]>The return of the "Ah, fuck it" stance... Lol

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528665https://brownsboard.com/post/528665Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:19:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:58:19 GMT]]>

@diehardbrownsfan said:

I drive a Subaru with the PZEV engine. Wonder what kind of cars these screaming liberals drive?

2011 Outback premium here.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528654https://brownsboard.com/post/528654Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:58:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:52:54 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Yes yes yes the numbers say the climate is changing. No disagreement from me. I would also guess that mankind might have something of an effect on that. How much and what can or will possibly be done about that? I have absolutely no idea nor do most of the people here despite the ongoing screaming match.

I'm just repeating my matter since you just recently joined the fracas.

(my gut feeling is that those who claim it isn't happening at all are just doing so to rattle the cages of the few who seemed to be hyperventilating over it 😉 )

WSS

I drive a Subaru with the PZEV engine. Wonder what kind of cars these screaming liberals drive?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528651https://brownsboard.com/post/528651Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:52:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:50:17 GMT]]>No, climate CHANGE is happening. It always has been.

But global warming is nonsense. I just posted an article about

the ice expanding.

And 140 scientists want the UN to put up, or shut up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528650https://brownsboard.com/post/528650Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:50:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:20:42 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

In the 8th century BC the Egyptians believed the earth was flat. While I haven't read every study that suggests climate change is a modern problem nor have I read every response, I tend to hedge my bets on global preservation.

Yes yes yes the numbers say the climate is changing. No disagreement from me. I would also guess that mankind might have something of an effect on that. How much and what can or will possibly be done about that? I have absolutely no idea nor do most of the people here despite the ongoing screaming match.

I'm just repeating my matter since you just recently joined the fracas.

(my gut feeling is that those who claim it isn't happening at all are just doing so to rattle the cages of the few who seemed to be hyperventilating over it 😉 )

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528644https://brownsboard.com/post/528644Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:20:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:07:00 GMT]]>I prefer to listen to scientists who tell the TRUTH:

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/09/09/arctic-has-gained-hundreds-of-miles-of-ice-the-last-three-years/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528617https://brownsboard.com/post/528617Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:07:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:37:58 GMT]]>In the 8th century BC the Egyptians believed the earth was flat. While I haven't read every study that suggests climate change is a modern problem nor have I read every response, I tend to hedge my bets on global preservation.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528583https://brownsboard.com/post/528583Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:37:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:23:20 GMT]]>Please read to the end! The Washington Post
The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some
places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the
Commerce Department yesterday from Consulate, at Bergen, Norway.
Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical
change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic
zone.
Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far
north as 81 degrees 29 minutes, (81°, 29").
Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very
warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth
and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have
entirely disappeared.
Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while
vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north,
are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.
Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will
rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.
I must apologize. I neglected to mention that this report was from
November 2, 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post -
92 years ago.
]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528576https://brownsboard.com/post/528576Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:23:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:45:11 GMT]]>again, if we are discussing mmgw endlessly, for years, and it never comes up,

unless I or a couple of non-mmgw believers bring it up...

it is very obvious that you can't get libs to talk about it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/528479https://brownsboard.com/post/528479Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:45:11 GMT