@mld-woody said:

I changed one word.. Somehow it all becomes much more poignant doesn't it..

@mld-woody said:

I'm talking about Carson. I have no interest in comparing him to anyone else in an attempt to change the subject.

We must first decide if he is lying or naive.

************************************************

"There you go again...."

I happily accept valid counterpoints. But the inane side questions that change the subject,

and weird psycho-claims of phantom explanations that prove some kind of strawman point...

not so much. Although, if you see me calling Hoorta, Tour, Steve, Fairhooker, and other characters

names,

THEN you have me nailed with that. Everybody disagrees with me at one point or another - because

sometimes I'm full of crap.

Btw, my comma was absolutely acceptable, and I can only leave woody to his own weird birdbrain psychology defense

mechanisms for so long, and then the woodpecker syndrom hits.

@mld-woody said:

Going to throw a possible 3rd option out there his "manager" didn't read the contract and he couldn't back out after agreeing

@calfoxwc said:

Ok well i'm just gonna go ahead and give you my emotional knee jerky assessment of you. At times you present yourself like a bad grandpa. You fling insults and belittle people who merely brought up a legitimate counterpoint and did not resort to petty insults and name calling "WHATSOEVER". But you go there in a flash...almost on principle. It's one thing to flame back at people, but you just try to completely shit on anyone that doesn't fall in line with you.

It's like I hear some old man talking when you post, "in my day sonney boy, you shut the fuck and accepted whatever someone older than you said....bahh, bahhhh".

How am I doin? Got it about right?

@calfoxwc said:

keep repeating the mantra, eventually you'll get the hang of it

@calfoxwc said:

How so? Do ed and woody lie all the time? Are you trying to superimpose some bogus characteristics on others here for the purpose of deflection?

you and woodpecker.

LOL. (seriously)

I particularly like the part where the chap who's supposed to be clearing Carson's name says "I may mess up some of the details" after specifically preparing for the interview.

He decided to "never do this again" when he started his campaign because he knew it would be bad PR.

Carson certainly isn't the biggest liar on stage, but he's willfully ignorant and has some of the worst plans for the future of the country probably partly because he has no idea how the country works

We must first decide if he is lying or naive.

The claim he got there, realized he didn't want to be a part of it, but then read the script anyway to not hurt anyone's feelings is laughable

He's either a liar or naive

Again, if you aren't going to read the article, and explanation of the truth

of the events...stop the stupidass emotional kneejerk or, STFU.

Like woody said, which is better, liar or naive?

if anyone cared that I used natural ingredient based product like Super Beta Prostate (which I do)

because its claims to reduce my huge prostate and help me urinate better,

then yea I'll led my voice to its claims.

this whole witchhunt is just more DNC BS and like a geico commercial - "its what you do"

Which is better?