<![CDATA[Crazy idea]]>What if we traded the #5 and DA for the #12 and #18?

#5 is worth 1700 points

#12 is worth 1200 points

#18 is worth 900 points

So that's 400 points difference, which is a high 2nd rounder.

Essentially trading DA for a 2nd rounder.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3946/crazy-ideaRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 06:08:13 GMTFri, 03 Apr 2009 02:53:57 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:39:06 GMT]]>There would have to be another reason for them to trade up to 5 then, because theres no point having Orton, DA, Sanchez and Simms on the roster. Doesnt make much sense for Denver.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58235https://brownsboard.com/post/58235Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:39:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:00:44 GMT]]>

@nicksilvy said:

Only problem is that it leaves us without a starting caliber qb. We could really make strides on defense with 4 picks in the first two round though.

BQ looks like a starter to me every bit as much if not more so than cassel was last year..and definately more capable then DA to start and being that bq has more then a cob of corn for a brain unlike DA he will actually get better and learn from his mistakes...😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58204https://brownsboard.com/post/58204Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:00:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:53:34 GMT]]>Because DA wouldn't pout and whine. He just wouldn't care.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58199https://brownsboard.com/post/58199Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:53:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:18:32 GMT]]>

@thaak said:

What if we traded the #5 and DA for the #12 and #18?

If McDaniels didn't like Cutler's "gunslinging," why would he want a shittier "gunslinger?"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58180https://brownsboard.com/post/58180Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:18:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:17:43 GMT]]>

@nicksilvy said:

Only problem is that it leaves us without a starting caliber qb. We could really make strides on defense with 4 picks in the first two round though.

Are you saying Quinn is not starting caliber?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58179https://brownsboard.com/post/58179Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:17:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:17:01 GMT]]>

@mr.-t said:

Not until DA is gone, Then the dust will settle.

Um, the trade INCLUDES sending DA to Denver. Re-read it please.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58178https://brownsboard.com/post/58178Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:17:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:37:15 GMT]]>Only problem is that it leaves us without a starting caliber qb. We could really make strides on defense with 4 picks in the first two round though.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58019https://brownsboard.com/post/58019Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:37:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:17:45 GMT]]>That would be a great deal for the Browns. Think of the two first round players the Browns could nab...

then they would have two picks in the second round...

Oh yeah. I'd love that deal.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58010https://brownsboard.com/post/58010Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:17:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:14:30 GMT]]>I'd go for it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58006https://brownsboard.com/post/58006Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:14:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy idea on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:10:53 GMT]]>Not until DA is gone, Then the dust will settle.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58002https://brownsboard.com/post/58002Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:10:53 GMT