<![CDATA[Which scenario helps the Browns most?]]>people are sprouting rumors and conjecture that the broncos might want to move up and snag either of the top-tier QBs after losing cutler.

with that in mind, would you guys rather see us pick up extra first-round picks for either quinn or our fifth overall, see denver trade with KC and have curry fall to us, or do you think that crabtree or orakpo would help us more than any of the other scenarios?

Poll results from the old forum

Pick the one you think will help the Browns most

  • KC trades with Denver, Curry falls to five: 9 votes
  • Denver trades us the 12th &amp; 18th for our first-rounder and our fourth-rounder: 28 votes
  • Denver trades us the 18th for Quinn: 2 votes
  • We draft Crabtree at five: 5 votes
  • We draft Orakpo at five: 3 votes
]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/3956/which-scenario-helps-the-browns-mostRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 09:53:05 GMTFri, 03 Apr 2009 16:23:30 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:44:16 GMT]]>where's the scenario where DA ISN'T our starting quarterback...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58435https://brownsboard.com/post/58435Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:44:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:12:47 GMT]]>We could always throw in Donte Stallworth (he's worth an additional .126 points) to sweeten the deal.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58414https://brownsboard.com/post/58414Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:12:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:58:07 GMT]]>the 2nd option (12th, 18th, for 5th and our 4th rounder) will never happen. Why?

Because:

the 5th is worth 1,700 points

the 12th is worth 1,200 points

the 18th is worth 900 points

that means we still owe them 400 points, which consequently is the 50th pick overall, which the Browns have.

Denver would be losing approximately 300 points, a late 2nd or early third round pick, if they only accepted our 4th.

Andy

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58412https://brownsboard.com/post/58412Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:58:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:54:39 GMT]]>Choices 1 & 2 are a "coin flip" for me. I don't see how we could go wrong with either. Part of me believes that Rey would be a more disruptive presence in the middle than Curry...not better, just more disruptive, & there is value there for an aggressive D. Then add the outside rusher.

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58382https://brownsboard.com/post/58382Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:54:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:17:51 GMT]]>Denver trades us the 12th & 18th for our first-rounder and our fourth-rounder.

Best option for us.

We could still probably snap up Rey Maualuga at 12th and with the 18th and our 2nd rounders could grab Alex Mac or Eric Wood and either a safety, corner, running back or wide receiver. Honestly I'd take a running back and wide receiver and gun for a top safety in next year's draft, it looks promising grabbing a long term starter in the 1st.

We could probably move DA and a later round pick and get an outside linebacker like Matthews day of the draft.

That could give us 2 starting linebackers, a starting center, a starting wide receiver and a solid tandem back.

It would go a long way to fixing some real holes we've got.

Sure, it's a fantasy but it'd be freaking sweet to see it happen.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58285https://brownsboard.com/post/58285Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:17:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:32:16 GMT]]>I really doubt KC and Denver make a trade, they are division rivals and that kind of trade would make too big of an impact for either of them to want to risk it.

That leaves a toss up between 12 and 18 or Crabtree for me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58260https://brownsboard.com/post/58260Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:32:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:31:03 GMT]]>Good poll, JD.

Since 4 and 5 are the only choices that do not involve trade speculation, I guess it's between those two. I'm choosing Crabtree.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58259https://brownsboard.com/post/58259Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:31:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:26:43 GMT]]>Almost impossible to choose between #1 and #2. I'd be very happy with either one.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58258https://brownsboard.com/post/58258Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:26:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:50:23 GMT]]>I like the 12th and 18th scenario, but if I'm Denver I'm not so sure. They would have gone from having Cutler and a 1st round draft pick to a drafted rookie QB and no 1st round picks left.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58219https://brownsboard.com/post/58219Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:50:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:12:14 GMT]]>if there's a scenario that you'd prefer (that's within the realm of possibility), let us know what it is.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58212https://brownsboard.com/post/58212Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:12:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:40:49 GMT]]>#1 here but theres little chance curry falls to #5 regardless...

I would like to see quinn get his chance to play for the team he roots for...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58192https://brownsboard.com/post/58192Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:40:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:35:12 GMT]]>The 12 and 18 would get us Maualuga and someone who could potentially fall out of the top 10

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58191https://brownsboard.com/post/58191Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:35:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:30:48 GMT]]>#1 or #2 for me please. and diet coke.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58190https://brownsboard.com/post/58190Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:30:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which scenario helps the Browns most? on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:27:32 GMT]]>not really wanting any of those choices , but this is my least offensive one . #1

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/58186https://brownsboard.com/post/58186Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:27:32 GMT