@clevfan4life said:

"Arm angle" close enough?

@clevfan4life said:

While on that subject, if we're keeping JFF on the roster for the year, maybe we can try him at RB? Slot receiver?

@tour2ma said:

why would your analysis of goff v wentz include phrasing such as "pad level" and "angle blocks"? You thinkin maybe some next level shit that we draft Goff/Wentz as OLB'er? Mind blown if that's where you're going....gonna have to look at some more pac west games if it is. lols

@tiamat63 said:

Life happens... we'll be here all year, my friend...

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

Tastes like victory.

I like the united front on this board to make one singular poster realize Bosa isn't the top prospect. Feel like we haven't been this united in a long time...

@gftchris said:

How's that brick wall tasting?

Tastes like victory.

I like the united front on this board to make one singular poster realize Bosa isn't the top prospect. Feel like we haven't been this united in a long time...

@tour2ma said:

Couple things...

• Again... Combine numbers are just useful in confirming what the tape showed.
• It's not where someone places in their draft class that matters; it's the actual numbers.

Fortunately for you his 10-yd split was not 1.96., but 1.68 (Semi-dyslexic?) and 1.68 is very good.

His vertical was a sub-standard 32". It failed to confirm his "burst". Combined with his 40 time it sent his evaluators back to their tape.

Thanks for the correction on the split -

Typing from my phone and I'm not sure how I messed that up. I wish I had more time to sit

down, better articulate my responses and invest some time in the board again. But it's busy season for me, sadly.

@clevfan4life said:

I may have to sue for royalties. I feel my Goff v Wentz argument has been sullied by DE name substitution.

@the-gipper said:

Dropped... he was #2 behind Tunsil prior to the Combine.

Point being you are not looking at recent data... check the links Mud supplied.

@mudfly said:

Here's those links you requested....(and these are the first 6 I opened and not hand picked)

http://www.nfldraftgeek.com/2016nfldraftrankings.html

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000624732/article/ranking-top-50-prospects-for-2016-nfl-draft

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2016/all

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2016/insider/story/_/id/14887419/updating-2016-big-board-following-nfl-combine-nfl-draft

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000641197/article/daniel-jeremiahs-top-50-prospects-for-2016-nfl-draft

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2621207-2016-nfl-draft-big-board-matt-millers-post-combine-rankings/page/2

Thanks for the assist...

@mudfly said:

I wouldn't be upset with Buckner but he's not as polished as Bosa. He didn't look as explosive as Bosa at combine. But he's also heavier so ur right he's more of a 5 tech guy. Thing is we need edges more than another inside lineman. We need people that can stick a pulling guard or tackle at the point, then get off that block to help in the play. This is what sets Bosa apart from Buckner. Bosa in my eyes plays more like the DE's from Carolina and Cincy. Very strong active guys that do more than just funnel the play towards the LB'ers. It used to be that's all you asked of edges but you can't anymore. They have to rip off of a blocker. We have edges that can't get of TE blocks. So that's why i'm still leaning Bosa. Jack is a good OLB'er no question, but Bosa will produce sooner than Jack for what the Browns need.

Bosa's gonna have to learn though that in the NFL you have to play with speed and leverage Lots of guys didn't make the transition, like Werner, too well. Werner played like a stone gargoyle at Fl state, but he lost that field leverage making the transition to the pro's.

@gftchris said:

Buckner is rising fast.....right there with Bosa.....and, honestly, much better suited for a 3-4 D....

@clevfan4life said:

Or maybe buckner, or jack, depending on who you listen to.

@gftchris said:

Ha!....yep, I sense a change in logic coming right up....or just stubborn ignorance of the facts....

Right now, based upon pundit evals....BPA means we pick an OT or Safety.....

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

How's that brick wall tasting?

@the-gipper said:

Again....you know more than all the professional talent evaluators combined?

Whether or not he should be compared to Watt is one thing.....but he is rated the #1 best player in this draft by a vast majority (or a vast plurality) of scouts.

Once again, this is not true.

@tour2ma said:

Michael Bennett had a overall 5.13 40 and 31" vertical. Combine cannot necessarily show "talent". Only the Seahawks took a flyer on him because his brother was an athletic NFL TE and near clone.

@tiamat63 said:

Couple things...

1. Again... Combine numbers are just useful in confirming what the tape showed.
2. It's not where someone places in their draft class that matters; it's the actual numbers.

Of Joey's numbers his sub-7 3-cone was most impressive to me. Very nice agility for a man of his length let alone weight. But his shuttle, bench reps and broad were all OK.

Fortunately for you his 10-yd split was not 1.96., but 1.68 (Semi-dyslexic?) and 1.68 is very good.

His vertical was a sub-standard 32". It failed to confirm his "burst". Combined with his 40 time it sent his evaluators back to their tape.

@tiamat63 said:

OSU Michael Bennett or Seahawks Michael Bennett?

If it's the Seahawks he did not exactly wow anyone at the combine and signed as an undrafted FA. Only later would they discover what a great pro he has turned out to be.

@tiamat63 said:

Bosa will end up being far stronger and more explosive around the edge than Kerrigan.

@tour2ma said:

For anyone that puts stock into 40 times for defensive line... sure.

Top 5 broad jump, 1.96 10 yard split, took home tops 3 cone drill and 20 yard shuttle. Indicate he's got some explosiveness to his step.

edit: Everyone keeps saying Ryan Kerrigan. That's just because they see a white guy playing LE.

I see a Michael Bennett clone, save for the skin color.