<![CDATA[Park your tents]]>So after all of these camps, who do you think we should draft? Not worrying about what happens after, who would you pick, or who do you want the browns to pick?

This is assuming Tunsil goes first overall (because that is currently the consensus thinking and nobody on this board would probably be interested, so it makes life easier).

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/39723/park-your-tentsRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 07:56:46 GMTTue, 01 Mar 2016 15:07:09 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:45:12 GMT]]>In the words of the old Knight in Indy and the Last Crusade.... "You have chosen wisely."

@gftchris said:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000640859/article/jerry-jones-cowboys-wont-draft-qb-with-no-4-overall-pick

Cowboys won't draft a QB at #4...take it as you will, it's silly season after all.

I believe in Jerrah... and Jerrah thinks Romo will play forever...

@gumby73 said:

Wonder how much affect Hue's decision will weigh on his former coaching back at Cal. You would think he's got the full school book, practice tapes etc.. on Goff more than Wentz?

Except for Goff's body of work being thicker... Who knows?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583135https://brownsboard.com/post/583135Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:45:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:03:12 GMT]]>OK, I picked Goff, Everybody keeps saying franchise QB, Hell can ether Goff or Wentz become a top 15 QB in the NFL, if so then a pick at two is worth doing. I'd love a so called franchise QB, but top 15 is still worth a number two.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583078https://brownsboard.com/post/583078Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:03:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:45:13 GMT]]>

@mark-o said:

Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.

Wonder how much affect Hue's decision will weigh on his former coaching back at Cal. You would think he's got the full school book, practice tapes etc.. on Goff more than Wentz?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583075https://brownsboard.com/post/583075Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:45:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:58:45 GMT]]>http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000640859/article/jerry-jones-cowboys-wont-draft-qb-with-no-4-overall-pick

Cowboys won't draft a QB at #4...take it as you will, it's silly season after all.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583074https://brownsboard.com/post/583074Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:58:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:37:54 GMT]]>

@canton-dawg said:

Someone on Twitter said the same thing about the "weak" QB class in this year 's draft.

That same person (I think it was Charlie Casserly) said that Goff graded out better than Mariota.

And so he did...

MM graded out at 6.38 - http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/marcus-mariota?id=2552466

JG graded out at 6.73 - http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/jared-goff?id=2555334

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583070https://brownsboard.com/post/583070Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:37:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:47:26 GMT]]>

@mark-o said:

Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.

This is my take as well. I trust that Hue will know better than any of us as to what a good QB looks like.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583027https://brownsboard.com/post/583027Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:47:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:27:27 GMT]]>Hue knows Qb's and so therefore, I trust him to know what he wants in a QB. Maybe he's in love with Osweiler so we go all in to sign him away from Denver...I don't see that happening but it's possible...whoever Hue wants as QB will be most likely the best QB we've had since Couch.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583020https://brownsboard.com/post/583020Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:27:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:19:11 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Depth perception has shifted lately. This "weak" QB class is now judged to have not only 2 solid ones leading the way, but more Depth than average. It's possible we'll see 4 go in the 1st and likely 7 in the first two rounds.

Someone on Twitter said the same thing about the "weak" QB class in this year 's draft.

That same person (I think it was Charlie Casserly) said that Goff graded out better than Mariota.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583017https://brownsboard.com/post/583017Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:19:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 01:33:02 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

Morning - it'll be about 1am for me.

But for once I agree with you calblaze - there's a big drop off in QB talent, it's a WR poor draft, and very deep in DL/DB. It makes much more sense to go QB first and D on day two.

Depth perception has shifted lately. This "weak" QB class is now judged to have not only 2 solid ones leading the way, but more Depth than average. It's possible we'll see 4 go in the 1st and likely 7 in the first two rounds.

WRs look pretty lean after the Combine. Ditto the TEs.

OTs look good although a couple of the top ones elude me. More than made up for by some Day 2 prospects. Interoior OL kinda lean, but love a couple.

DTs are the flat out strength of the draft including some outstanding 3-4 DE conversion candidates. Edge are good, but hurt by injuries.

OLs are disappointing. Ragland falling inside and beyond top couple OLBs not much, but I have taken to Schobert.

CBs may be as deep as I can remember. Safeties??? Not so much...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/583001https://brownsboard.com/post/583001Thu, 03 Mar 2016 01:33:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:43:42 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

So, not exactly setting us back 5 years, was my point. More like 2.

.95' to 16' ........... Looks like 21 to me 🙁 My point being is if we take one of these dudes at 2, then he better be the next Cam or Andrew, or we'll just keep going around the toilet bowl in circles................ Here's to hoping the jump from NDS to the NFL is a tiny one.

Gotta love the combine.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582920https://brownsboard.com/post/582920Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:43:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:29:36 GMT]]>

@d-bone said:

Kind of answered your own question? lol We went 3-13 this season and missing on both of the turds at #22 is one of the reasons why.... Also, a 1st QB off the board, #2 pick is way different than a second selection in the 1st, #22 QB. So much more will be expected from him, it's not even realistic to compare them.

So, not exactly setting us back 5 years, was my point. More like 2.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582917https://brownsboard.com/post/582917Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:29:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:18:59 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

If we pick a QB at 2 and he is indeed the next former QB, we're only set back a couple of years - are we set any further back now than when we drafted Manziel 2 years ago? How about then compared to Weeden in 2012?

That being said, I'd move back a couple of spots to pick up a second or a first.

Kind of answered your own question? lol We went 3-13 this season and missing on both of the turds at #22 is one of the reasons why.... Also, a 1st QB off the board, #2 pick is way different than a second selection in the 1st, #22 QB. So much more will be expected from him, it's not even realistic to compare them.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582913https://brownsboard.com/post/582913Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:18:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:08:24 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

better to draft the best offensive player in the draft = quarterback.

The draft is deep in DL, lbs, cb's,...

you watch on draft morning, pick #2

Morning - it'll be about 1am for me.

But for once I agree with you calblaze - there's a big drop off in QB talent, it's a WR poor draft, and very deep in DL/DB. It makes much more sense to go QB first and D on day two.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582910https://brownsboard.com/post/582910Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:08:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:03:20 GMT]]>better to draft the best offensive player in the draft = quarterback.

The draft is deep in DL, lbs, cb's,...

you watch on draft morning, pick #2

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582909https://brownsboard.com/post/582909Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:03:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:56:12 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

Nightmare scenario:

  1. trade down with Dallas
  2. Dallas picks Wentz
  3. SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
  4. We tread water another year...Tour

***************

Exactly. And the NFL would laugh at the Browns for an entire season or more.

So under this nightmare scenario we would be forced to find the best defensive player in a defensive class? Oh, woe is us. 🥷

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582903https://brownsboard.com/post/582903Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:56:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:40:19 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

Nightmare scenario:

  1. trade down with Dallas
  2. Dallas picks Wentz
  3. SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
  4. We tread water another year...Tour

***************

Exactly. And the NFL would laugh at the Browns for an entire season or more.

Especially if we pick Justin Gilbert Jr

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582890https://brownsboard.com/post/582890Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:40:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:39:39 GMT]]>Nightmare scenario:


  1. trade down with Dallas
  2. Dallas picks Wentz
  3. SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
  4. We tread water another year...Tour

***************


Exactly. And the NFL would laugh at the Browns for an entire season or more.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582888https://brownsboard.com/post/582888Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:39:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:39:09 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

You'd think so Chris, but up popped this not all that long ago...

Report: Kaepernick wants out of San Francisco
Posted by Mike Florio on February 2, 2016, 7:36 PM EST

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/02/02/report-kaepernick-wants-out-of-san-francisco/

He's asked for a trade as well. I'm saying, he'll stay put and run Chip's O.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582887https://brownsboard.com/post/582887Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:39:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:37:27 GMT]]>You'd think so Chris, but up popped this not all that long ago...

Report: Kaepernick wants out of San Francisco
Posted by Mike Florio on February 2, 2016, 7:36 PM EST

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/02/02/report-kaepernick-wants-out-of-san-francisco/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582885https://brownsboard.com/post/582885Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:37:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:04:20 GMT]]>I see Chip and Kaepernick trying to form a dream team. I mean, if you're Kaep, who is the *one* coach in the league you want to come to town? And Chip has probably gone there on the basis that Kaep is in town.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582866https://brownsboard.com/post/582866Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:04:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:00:22 GMT]]>Agree, cal... big drop off.

Nightmare scenario:

  1. trade down with Dallas
  2. Dallas picks Wentz
  3. SF trades up to #3 and tabs Goff
  4. We tread water another year...

@gftchris said:

Tour - geoff schwartz and duke mayweather debating the new chop block and how it affects blocking schemes, and the RB position. Thought you might be interested

http://art19.com/shows/blockem-up/episodes/edffa781-f3a7-4ef6-8497-f96527d5191e

Will give it a listen. From what I understand it should not impact RBs much since past restriction was primarily aimed at them and cut blocks will still be legal...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582862https://brownsboard.com/post/582862Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:00:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:10:38 GMT]]>I think the drop off from Goff and Wentz is... the rest are second tier.

It's Wentz... or maybe Goff, at the 2nd pick overall.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582815https://brownsboard.com/post/582815Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:10:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:28:21 GMT]]>

@d-bone said:

I'm in camp trade back. I know it takes two for a trade, but hopefully there's a partner out there. I'm not sold that any of the QBs are "franchise QB" material........ If we select one of them at 2, and he's the next former Browns QB, we are set back another 5yrs. Give me a couple of safer picks like Jack @ 7-10, then whoever at 32 and of course someone with the pick(s) we got in the trade.

North Dakota State is a long way from the NFL.

If we pick a QB at 2 and he is indeed the next former QB, we're only set back a couple of years - are we set any further back now than when we drafted Manziel 2 years ago? How about then compared to Weeden in 2012?

That being said, I'd move back a couple of spots to pick up a second or a first.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582808https://brownsboard.com/post/582808Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:28:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Park your tents on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:26:43 GMT]]>I'm in camp Hue and the gang know more than me so support them. But also in Camp Wentz with my very small amount of knowledge 🙂

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/582805https://brownsboard.com/post/582805Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:26:43 GMT