<![CDATA[Camp Trade Down]]>Now that the Browns have lost 4 starters in FA.....with the unlikelihood that they will all be replaced by other near equal FAs, it is clear that this team must build through the draft. And the way to do that is to get as many draft picks as possible.

A trade I suggested earlier still sounds perfect to me: Trade down from #2 to #4 with the Cowboys. Take back also their 2d round pick at #34..plus like a 6th rounder. That would give us #4, #32, #34, and #65

With needs now at QB, WR, OL, DE, DB.....and more......we need the picks to fill the holes.

If not the Cowboys...who else could be a possible trade partner

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/39811/camp-trade-downRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:02:52 GMTThu, 10 Mar 2016 15:01:33 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Fri, 29 Apr 2016 03:54:40 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

If that rookie OT is the next Joe Thomas (or even close) then it's not terrible.

You don't plan for a Joe Thomas.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600555https://brownsboard.com/post/600555Fri, 29 Apr 2016 03:54:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:35:26 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

Do the Texans need an OT ?

Need a LT? Not really, Dwayne Brown is a pretty good LT. But Joe'd be an upgrade...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600113https://brownsboard.com/post/600113Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:35:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:19:36 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

We get Texans 22 they get Joe Thomas ...we take OT at 8 and Lynch at 22 or a WR and we still have 32 and the rest of the picks...

Do the Texans need an OT ?

Give them Joe Thomas and RG3 for the first and second.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600079https://brownsboard.com/post/600079Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:19:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:11:19 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

And, if he isn't? If he is the next Robert Gallery?

We go 3-13 with a bad offense, like we did with Joe?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600073https://brownsboard.com/post/600073Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:11:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:09:31 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

If that rookie OT is the next Joe Thomas (or even close) then it's not terrible.

And, if he isn't? If he is the next Robert Gallery?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600072https://brownsboard.com/post/600072Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:09:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:08:43 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

We get Texans 22 they get Joe Thomas ...we take OT at 8 and Lynch at 22 or a WR and we still have 32 and the rest of the picks...

Do the Texans need an OT ?

No, just fuck no.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600070https://brownsboard.com/post/600070Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:08:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:00:34 GMT]]>

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

Joe Thomas is worth more than #22, we'd just be, in effect, replacing him with a rookie OT. Very bad trade.

If that rookie OT is the next Joe Thomas (or even close) then it's not terrible.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600064https://brownsboard.com/post/600064Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:00:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:54:58 GMT]]>

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

Joe Thomas is worth more than #22, we'd just be, in effect, replacing him with a rookie OT. Very bad trade.

Plus 10 years and huge savings though.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600061https://brownsboard.com/post/600061Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:54:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:51:25 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

We get Texans 22 they get Joe Thomas ...we take OT at 8 and Lynch at 22 or a WR and we still have 32 and the rest of the picks...

Do the Texans need an OT ?

Joe Thomas is worth more than #22, we'd just be, in effect, replacing him with a rookie OT. Very bad trade.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600058https://brownsboard.com/post/600058Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:51:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:26:36 GMT]]>We get Texans 22 they get Joe Thomas ...we take OT at 8 and Lynch at 22 or a WR and we still have 32 and the rest of the picks...

Do the Texans need an OT ?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600050https://brownsboard.com/post/600050Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:26:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:57:10 GMT]]>Up to 22 for Lynch? What could possibly go wrong?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600036https://brownsboard.com/post/600036Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:57:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:41:07 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

Who picks 22?....I see that it is the DumbAss Texans. What do they have that we would want to trade down that far for?

(I could actually see the Browns wanting to trade up from 32 ti 22 to like get Lynch. What can we give them to trade up?

Just to go both barrels on it, we could trade back with the titans, pick up an extra 2, and then swap the 2 2s for 22.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600011https://brownsboard.com/post/600011Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:41:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:47:05 GMT]]>

@browns1216 said:

maybe the Browns are trying to get to the #22 spot to draft their QB of the future 😉

Who picks 22?....I see that it is the DumbAss Texans. What do they have that we would want to trade down that far for?

(I could actually see the Browns wanting to trade up from 32 ti 22 to like get Lynch. What can we give them to trade up?

Edit: How about this: We get #22 from the DATs.....780 draft value pts. We give the 32...590 pts....plus #77...205 pts for a total of 795 pts........almost even.......the DATs get the extra points as sweetener.

Browns get Lynch at #22. (plus they have kept #8)

If that were the case....I would do it. And try again at #22. Fuck the curse.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/600009https://brownsboard.com/post/600009Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:47:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:53:01 GMT]]>maybe the Browns are trying to get to the #22 spot to draft their QB of the future 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599993https://brownsboard.com/post/599993Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:53:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:52:03 GMT]]>That would include the two QBs, presumably, but maybe not wentz.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599992https://brownsboard.com/post/599992Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:52:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:41:26 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.

Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?

Who are the 8? Does that include the 2 QBs at the top of the draft.....or does that mean 8 other players?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599985https://brownsboard.com/post/599985Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:41:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:06:15 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.

Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?

Depends how far we are moving back.....would expect at least a 2 and a 4 to move back to 15 as well as the 15th pick ....back to 20 and I would want the 20 a 2 and a 3

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599968https://brownsboard.com/post/599968Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:06:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:58:46 GMT]]>So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.

Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599963https://brownsboard.com/post/599963Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:58:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:57:15 GMT]]> Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora 3h3 hours ago

Expecting at least 3 more trades in the 1st round tonite. No better place to watch draft unfold than our live shows online @CBSSports



3 more ...Browns to 13 then to 20 then to ? 🙂


]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599962https://brownsboard.com/post/599962Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:57:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:51:38 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

I've been saying for some time an OL will be one of our first picks.

You are very wise...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599745https://brownsboard.com/post/599745Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:51:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:15:26 GMT]]>

@logicisforsquares said:

He had a slow 40 time so it might cause a slight fall to 15. I wouldn't hate it at all.

Jerry Rice had a slow 40 time. About the same as Treadwell.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599701https://brownsboard.com/post/599701Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:15:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:11:18 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

No ...I meant a team will move up to 8 for Elliott ( Miami or Chicago ) or an OT ( Tennessee )

Fair enough. I stand by what I said though.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599698https://brownsboard.com/post/599698Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:11:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:10:12 GMT]]>No ...I meant a team will move up to 8 for Elliott ( Miami or Chicago ) or an OT ( Tennessee )

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599697https://brownsboard.com/post/599697Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:10:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Trade Down on Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:08:02 GMT]]>

@darren15 said:

Rappaport reporting Browns in discussions to trade out of 8 for Elliott ( if Dallas dont take him ) or an OT ....11, 13 , 15 the proposed landing spots for Cleveland

I've been saying for some time an OL will be one of our first picks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/599694https://brownsboard.com/post/599694Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:08:02 GMT