<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[First vs. Best]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Much ado has been made about the fact that the Browns likely have the chance now to take the first QB that will be available in the forthcoming draft and that the Browns should make hay with that opportunity.</p>
<p>But....in the words of Lee Corso "Not so Fast My Friends"....maybe taking the first QB in a draft does not often mean that you get the best QB in the draft.</p>
<p>Here is a list of each of the first drafted QB in each draft in the Common draft era:  1966 to current, along with what QB was actually the best QB taken in that draft.  If it is one and the same, then there will be a # sign, in a few years it is debatable and I will note those:</p>

<p>1966 Randy Johnson #</p>
<p>1967 Steve Spurrier....vs. <strong>Bob Griese</strong></p>
<p>1968 Greg Landry....<strong>Ken Stabler</strong></p>
<p>1969 Greg Cook.....James Harris</p>
<p>1970<strong> Terry Bradshaw</strong> #</p>
<p>1971 Jim Plunkett....Ken Anderson# (but also Archie Manning/Joe Theisman in mix)</p>
<p>1972 Jerry Tagge....Brian Sipe</p>
<p>1973 Bert Jones....<strong>.Dan Fouts</strong></p>
<p>1974 Danny White#</p>
<p>1975 Steve Bartkowski....Steve Grogan</p>
<p>1976 Richard Todd#</p>
<p>1977 Steve Pisarkewiscz....Tommy Kramer</p>
<p>1978 Doug Williams</p>
<p>1979 Jack Thompson....<strong>Joe Montana</strong></p>
<p>1980 Marc Wilson....Eric Hipple  (actually about equal between two mediocre QBs)</p>
<p>1981 Rich Campbell....Neil Lomax</p>
<p>1982 Art Schlichter....Jim McMahon</p>
<p>1983 <strong>John Elway</strong>....vs. <strong>Dan Marino (Jim Kelly also close)? </strong></p>
<p>1984 Bommer Esiason#</p>
<p>1985 Randall Cunningham#   (but Kosar in Supp draft??)</p>
<p>1986 Jim Everett</p>
<p>1987 Vinny Testaverde.....vs. Rich Gannon  (close matchup)</p>
<p>1988 Tom Tupa ...Chris Chandler</p>
<p>1989<strong> Troy Aikman</strong>#</p>
<p>1990 Jeff George....Neil O'Donnell</p>
<p>1991 Dan McGwire.....<strong>Brett Favre</strong></p>
<p>1992 David Klingler....Brad Johnson</p>
<p>1993 Drew Bledsoe#</p>
<p>1994 Heath Shuler....Gus Frerotte or Trent Dilfer</p>
<p>1995 Steve McNair#</p>
<p>1996 Tony Banks#</p>
<p>1997 Jim Drukenmiller....Jake Plummer</p>
<p>1998<strong> Peyton Manning</strong>#</p>
<p>1999 Tim Couch....Donovan McNabb</p>
<p>2000 Chad Pennington.....<strong>Tom Brady</strong></p>
<p>2001 Michael Vick.....Drew Brees</p>
<p>2002 David Carr....David Garrard</p>
<p>2003 Carson Palmer#</p>
<p>2004 Eli Manning....vs. Phillip Rivers or Ben R.  debateable</p>
<p>2005 Alex Smith....Aaron Rodgers</p>
<p>2006 Vince Young....Jay Cutler</p>
<p>2007 Jamarcus Russell....Trent Edwards</p>
<p>2008 Matt Ryan#  (or Joe Flacco?)</p>
<p>2009 Matt Stafford#</p>
<p>2010 Sam Bradford#</p>
<p>2011 Cam Newton</p>
<p>2012 Andrew Luck....Russell Wilson</p>
<p>2013 EJ Manuel...or Geno Smith  (equally bad)</p>
<p>2014 Blake Bortles.....Teddy Twatwater...so far</p>
<p>2015 Jameis Winston#   so far</p>

<p>Out of 50 years, only 19 times did  the first QB taken in the draft turn out to be the best QB to come out of that draft.   In 5 other years I think it is debateable  (1971, 1980, 1987 2004, 2013) leaving at least 26 times where clearly the better QB was not the first QB taken.</p>
<p>So that means that, historically, we have a 38% to get the best QB in this draft, if we take one at #2 .</p>
<p>Food for thought. </p>
<p>Bold= HOF or certain HOF.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/40044/first-vs.-best</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:53:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/40044.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 16:54:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:02:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/vagitron" aria-label="Profile: vagitron">@<bdi>vagitron</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594649">said</a>:</p><div><p>Is this fantasy football or football?</p></div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Again, good question.....when it comes to a stat I use often:  the PFR Career Production Average,  Rivers actually has the slight advantage over both BR and Eli.....(combining total yds/TDs/percentages etc. etc.)</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">But those other two guys have the rings.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Here is the statistical breakdown for those Top 11 2004 draftees:</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">Completions/atts:  Rivers 3462/5339  BR 3476/5423 Eli 3695/6227</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Yards:  Rivers 41,447  BR 42, 995 Eli 44,191</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">TDs: Rivers 281  BR 272  Eli 294</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">TD%: Rivers 5.3  BR 5.0  Eli 4.7</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Ints: Rivers 135  BR 147 Eli 199</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Int%: Rivers 2.5  BR 2.7  Eli 3.2</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Y/Att: Rivers 7.8  BR 7.9 Eli 7.1</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">YPG: Rivers 252.7 BR 251.4 Eli 238.9</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Rating: Rivers 95.5 BR 94.0 Eli 83.5</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Comp % Rivers 64.8  BR 64.1 Eli 59.3</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">CA: River 151  BR 145 Eli 134</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">All very similar...Eli's Ints  and completion % give him a lower rating I think.   The big difference between these guys:</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">2 of them have 2 rings.....one has none.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">How much of that is serendipity?</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594698</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594698</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:02:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:44:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gumby73" aria-label="Profile: gumby73">@<bdi>gumby73</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594515">said</a>:</p><div><p>So 8 years later the closest to Ryan &amp; Flaco are sitting at #2. Which one you want? <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=7066fa4b48b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p></div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Interesting question.......  they are very similar to me.  Fair to say?   Flacco has that ring which likely gives him the edge.  But Ryan never had the kind of defense Flacco has had backing him up in his career.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594695</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594695</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:44:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:42:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nickers" aria-label="Profile: nickers">@<bdi>nickers</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594512">said</a>:</p><div><p>I thought Neil Lomax with the cardinals was pretty good.. he was the best they had since John Hart.. Injuries ended Lomax's career early.</p></div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">He was a pretty good QB.   i think he was a run n' shoot guy in college.  The team around him was not very good.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594694</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594694</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:42:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:41:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Zombo <a href="/post/593569">said</a>:</p>
<p>Carr is better than both.</p>

<p>Z</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  Fantasy football which I love has ruined how we evaluate players in the nfl.  Carr is the best of that class.  </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vagitron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:41:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:39:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593513">said</a>:</p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Phillip Rivers is actually, statistically the most productive of those 3 2004 QBs.   But he is the one without titles.  The other two have two each.....so they have that edge.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Of course....what would Rivers have done with the Steelers defenses over the years?  Possibly just as good or better.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is this fantasy football or football?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vagitron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:39:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:10:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593462">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>2008 Matt Ryan#  (or Joe Flacco?)</p>
<p>So that means that, historically, we have a 38% to get the best QB in this draft, if we take one at #2 .</p>

</div></blockquote>
<p>So 8 years later the closest to Ryan &amp; Flaco are sitting at #2. Which one you want? <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=7066fa4b48b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594515</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594515</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:10:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 20:32:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593462">said</a>:</p>
<p>Much ado has been made about the fact that the Browns likely have the chance now to take the first QB that will be available in the forthcoming draft and that the Browns should make hay with that opportunity.</p>
<p>
But....in the words of Lee Corso "Not so Fast My Friends"....maybe taking the first QB in a draft does not often mean that you get the best QB in the draft.</p>
<p>
Here is a list of each of the first drafted QB in each draft in the Common draft era:  1966 to current, along with what QB was actually the best QB taken in that draft.  If it is one and the same, then there will be a # sign, in a few years it is debatable and I will note those:</p>

<p>
1966 Randy Johnson #</p>
<p>
1967 Steve Spurrier....vs. <strong>Bob Griese</strong></p>
<p>
1968 Greg Landry....<strong>Ken Stabler</strong></p>
<p>
1969 Greg Cook.....James Harris</p>
<p>
1970<strong> Terry Bradshaw</strong> #</p>
<p>
1971 Jim Plunkett....Ken Anderson# (but also Archie Manning/Joe Theisman in mix)</p>
<p>
1972 Jerry Tagge....Brian Sipe</p>
<p>
1973 Bert Jones....<strong>.Dan Fouts</strong></p>
<p>
1974 Danny White#</p>
<p>
1975 Steve Bartkowski....Steve Grogan</p>
<p>
1976 Richard Todd#</p>
<p>
1977 Steve Pisarkewiscz....Tommy Kramer</p>
<p>
1978 Doug Williams</p>
<p>
1979 Jack Thompson....<strong>Joe Montana</strong></p>
<p>
1980 Marc Wilson....Eric Hipple  (actually about equal between two mediocre QBs)</p>
<p>
1981 Rich Campbell....Neil Lomax</p>
<p>
1982 Art Schlichter....Jim McMahon</p>
<p>
1983 <strong>John Elway</strong>....vs. <strong>Dan Marino (Jim Kelly also close)? </strong></p>
<p>
1984 Bommer Esiason#</p>
<p>
1985 Randall Cunningham#   (but Kosar in Supp draft??)</p>
<p>
1986 Jim Everett</p>
<p>
1987 Vinny Testaverde.....vs. Rich Gannon  (close matchup)</p>
<p>
1988 Tom Tupa ...Chris Chandler</p>
<p>
1989<strong> Troy Aikman</strong>#</p>
<p>
1990 Jeff George....Neil O'Donnell</p>
<p>
1991 Dan McGwire.....<strong>Brett Favre</strong></p>
<p>
1992 David Klingler....Brad Johnson</p>
<p>
1993 Drew Bledsoe#</p>
<p>
1994 Heath Shuler....Gus Frerotte or Trent Dilfer</p>
<p>
1995 Steve McNair#</p>
<p>
1996 Tony Banks#</p>
<p>
1997 Jim Drukenmiller....Jake Plummer</p>
<p>
1998<strong> Peyton Manning</strong>#</p>
<p>
1999 Tim Couch....Donovan McNabb</p>
<p>
2000 Chad Pennington.....<strong>Tom Brady</strong></p>
<p>
2001 Michael Vick.....Drew Brees</p>
<p>
2002 David Carr....David Garrard</p>
<p>
2003 Carson Palmer#</p>
<p>
2004 Eli Manning....vs. Phillip Rivers or Ben R.  debateable</p>
<p>
2005 Alex Smith....Aaron Rodgers</p>
<p>
2006 Vince Young....Jay Cutler</p>
<p>
2007 Jamarcus Russell....Trent Edwards</p>
<p>
2008 Matt Ryan#  (or Joe Flacco?)</p>
<p>
2009 Matt Stafford#</p>
<p>
2010 Sam Bradford#</p>
<p>
2011 Cam Newton</p>
<p>
2012 Andrew Luck....Russell Wilson</p>
<p>
2013 EJ Manuel...or Geno Smith  (equally bad)</p>
<p>
2014 Blake Bortles.....Teddy Twatwater...so far</p>
<p>
2015 Jameis Winston#   so far</p>

<p>
Out of 50 years, only 19 times did  the first QB taken in the draft turn out to be the best QB to come out of that draft.   In 5 other years I think it is debateable  (1971, 1980, 1987 2004, 2013) leaving at least 26 times where clearly the better QB was not the first QB taken.</p>
<p>
So that means that, historically, we have a 38% to get the best QB in this draft, if we take one at #2 .</p>
<p>
Food for thought. </p>
<p>
Bold= HOF or certain HOF.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
I thought Neil Lomax with the cardinals was pretty good.. he was the best they had since John Hart.. Injuries ended Lomax's career early.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nickers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 20:32:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 15:56:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How long have you been trying to end this discussion now?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594469</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594469</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 15:56:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:28:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>And so theres no misunderstanding, bpa means tunsil, bosa or ramsey. End of discussion. Anyone of those guys fills basically dire immediate needs. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594387</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594387</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:28:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:26:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>No goff no fucking wentz, if ur not gonna take bpa than trade down and load up</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594386</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594386</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:26:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:52:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593814">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>LOL, around a 30% chance Gip. Let's look at the draft value chart for teams that might want to move up. (just QB needy teams- or potentially needy)</p>

<p>#2 to #1  Browns-  1st, - 3rd &amp; 4th (or next years 2nd)</p>
<p>#4 to #1  Dallas-   1st, 2nd, 3rd + next years 2nd.</p>
<p>#7 to #1  SF          1st, 2nd + next year 1st</p>
<p>#8 to #1 Eagles     1st, 2nd, 3rd + next years 1st</p>
<p>#15 to #1 Rams     1st + two more 1sts</p>
<p>#31 to #1 Broncos 1st, 2nd, next years 1st + Von Miller</p>

<p>MHO- Dallas and the Niners- if they really want a quarterback- will just sit tight, and draft the QB the Browns don't take. Those two are the only teams I'd worry about jumping to #1 overall. Jerrah says he isn't moving up, and the 49ers for the time being have a $11 million qb in  Kap.</p>
<p>There's other teams that may want a QB- like Buffalo and Chicago- but in all likelihood, they'll just wait and take Lynch instead of giving up the King's ransom to move to #1. Ditto that for the Rams.</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">I think that is right...and I think that is smart.  Again....my opinion is that none of these QBs have the talent worthy of the #2 overall pick. And in my opinion of the Browns draft one it will be because they are reaching for need. </span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">The one thing I think though that is happening for the Browns this year is that the analytics guys will be taking the emotion out of the draft process....perhaps even overruling Hue Jackson to do so. Emotion got us all these bad picks.   Like Zombo said, if we had just stayed put and taken the emotion out of things...that "need" to be proactive and creative and trying to outthink everyone but only outthinking themselves in the process....and taken the best player on the board we could have had the likes of Sammy Watkins, Khalil Mack, David Carr etc.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593869</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593869</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:52:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 04:39:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593725">said</a>:</p><div><p><span style="color:#800000">The Tits want a king's ransom they say to trade for the #1 pick.  I heard on the radio that some teams are so hot on Goff that they might be willing to do that. Do you think that could happen?</span></p></div></blockquote>

<p>LOL, around a 30% chance Gip. Let's look at the draft value chart for teams that might want to move up. (just QB needy teams- or potentially needy)</p>

<p>#2 to #1  Browns-  1st, - 3rd &amp; 4th (or next years 2nd)</p>
<p>#4 to #1  Dallas-   1st, 2nd, 3rd + next years 2nd.</p>
<p>#7 to #1  SF          1st, 2nd + next year 1st</p>
<p>#8 to #1 Eagles     1st, 2nd, 3rd + next years 1st</p>
<p>#15 to #1 Rams     1st + two more 1sts</p>
<p>#31 to #1 Broncos 1st, 2nd, next years 1st + Von Miller</p>

<p>MHO- Dallas and the Niners- if they really want a quarterback- will just sit tight, and draft the QB the Browns don't take. Those two are the only teams I'd worry about jumping to #1 overall. Jerrah says he isn't moving up, and the 49ers for the time being have a $11 million qb in  Kap.</p>
<p>There's other teams that may want a QB- like Buffalo and Chicago- but in all likelihood, they'll just wait and take Lynch instead of giving up the King's ransom to move to #1. Ditto that for the Rams.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593814</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593814</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 04:39:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 23:03:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593742">said</a>:</p><div><p><span style="color:rgb(128,0,0)">Not sure I follow you.</span></p></div></blockquote>
<p>Could you image Hopkins numbers if he ever had a QB in pros to throw to him? (it would be crazy) Mallet &amp; Hoyer. Yuk. Think QB David Carr might have been their Hopkins rookie year only &amp; Hopkins sat behind Andre Johnson? </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593746</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593746</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 23:03:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 21:38:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gumby73" aria-label="Profile: gumby73">@<bdi>gumby73</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593732">said</a>:</p><div><p>WR exception maybe D'Andre Hopkins. Due to that bitch catches anything close.(Mallet, Hoyer &amp; Weeden).  Was not with Carr?</p></div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Not sure I follow you.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593742</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593742</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 21:38:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 20:15:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>WR exception maybe D'Andre Hopkins. Due to that bitch catches anything close.(Mallet, Hoyer &amp; Weeden).  Was not with Carr?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593732</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593732</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 20:15:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:34:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>OK, final position to look at here:  Running back. Going back to 1980.  First RB taken....then "best/most productive one" and that persons draft slot at his position.  # means first take was best:</p>

<p>1980 Billy Sims#</p>
<p>1981 George Rogers.....James Brooks 5th RB picked</p>
<p>1982 Darrin Nelson.....Marcus Allen 3rd</p>
<p>1983 Eric Dickerson#</p>
<p>1984 Greg Bell.....Ernest Byner  38th RB selected</p>
<p>1985 George Adams.....Herschel Walker #9  (would have been #1 if not for USFL contract)</p>
<p>1986 Bo Jackson...Keith Byars/John Williams/Ronnie Harmon/Neal Anderson all with similar career stats</p>
<p>1987 Alonzo Highsmith....Merrill Hoge  37th pick</p>
<p>1988 Gaston Green....Thurman Thomas  5th pick</p>
<p>1989 Barry Sanders#</p>
<p>1990 Blair Thomas.....Emmit Smith 2d pick</p>
<p>1991 Leornard Russell....Ricky Watters 6th pick</p>
<p>1992 Tommy Vardell...Edgar Bennett  9th pick</p>
<p>1993 Garrison Hearst....Jerome Bettis  2d pick</p>
<p>1994 Marshall Faulk#</p>
<p>1995 Kijana Carger....Curtis Martin 10th pick</p>
<p>1996 Lawrence Phillips.....Eddie George 3rd pick</p>
<p>1997 Warrick Dunn.....Tiki Barber 3rd pick</p>
<p>1998 Curtis Enis....Fred Taylor 2d pick</p>
<p>1999 Edgerrin James #</p>
<p>2000 Jamal Lewis#</p>
<p>2001 LaDanian Tomlinson#</p>
<p>2002 William Green....Brian Westbrook 8th pick</p>
<p>2003 Willis McGahee#</p>
<p>2004 Stephen Jackson#</p>
<p>2005 Ronnie Brown....Frank Gore 6th pick</p>
<p>2006 Reggie Bush.....Maurice Jones-Drew 6th pick</p>
<p>2007 Adrian Peterson#</p>
<p>2008 Darren McFadden....Matt Forte 6th pick</p>
<p>2009 Knowshon Moreno...LeSean McCoy 4th pick</p>
<p>2010 CJ Spiller....Ryan Matthews 2d pick</p>
<p>2011 Marc Ingram....DeMarco Murray 6th pick</p>
<p>2012 Trent Richardson...Doug Martin 2d pick</p>
<p>2013 Giovanni Bernard...Eddy Lacy  4th pick</p>
<p>2014 Bishop Sankey....Jeremy Hill  2d pick</p>
<p>2015 Todd Gurley#....so far.</p>

<p>Notes:</p>
<p>Here, about 10 times out of 35 has the first RB drafted been the best...less than 30%.  Perhaps the adage:  you can get RBs anywhere does apply......but not that much more than at QB.  </p>
<p>1st QB best about 38%</p>
<p>1st WR best about 25%</p>
<p>1st RB best about 28%</p>

<p>Guys like Ernest Byner and Merrill Hoge would have been UFAs in today's system.  Can a UFA RB become one of the best? Certainly.  Wasn't Adrian Foster UFA?  Maybe some hope for The Crow.</p>
<p>But...I think still, if you think there is a stud RB out there, you may want to go all in for him.</p>
<p>But I personally would avoid Alabama RBs....and Penn St. RBs at the top of the draft.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593730</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593730</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:34:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:12:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593718">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>Let's apply this to another position:  Wide Receiver.   I will list the first WR taken in drafts (this time only going back to 1990), then the best WR taken in that draft....at their position....and compare.  # means first WR taken was the best:</p>

<p>2015 Amari Cooper # so far</p>
<p>2014 Sammy Watkins....Odell Beckham, 3rd  WR picked  (or could be too soon to tell)</p>
<p>2013 Tavon Austin....D'Andre Hopkins, 2d pick</p>
<p>2012 Justin Blackmon...Alshon Jeffrey 7th pick</p>
<p>2011 AJ Green/Julio Jones#....These guys picked 1 and 2 have almost identical statistics</p>
<p>2010 Demaryious Thomas.....Antonio Brown  23rd pick WR picked</p>
<p>2009 Darius Heyward-Bey....Mike Wallace 11th</p>
<p>2008 Donnie Aubrey....DeSean Jackson 7th</p>
<p>2007 Calvin Johnson #</p>
<p>2006 SAntonio Holmes...Brandon Marshall 14th </p>
<p>2005 Braylon Edwards...Roddy White 6th</p>
<p>2004 Larry Fitzgerald#</p>
<p>2003 Charles Rogers...Andre Johnson 2d</p>
<p>2002 Donte Stallworth...Deion Branch 11th</p>
<p>2001 David Terrell....Reggie Wayne 6th</p>
<p>2000 Peter Warrick...Plaxico Burris 2d</p>
<p>1999 Tori Holt#</p>
<p>1998 Kevin Dyson....Randy Moss 2d</p>
<p>1997 Ike Hilliard ...Derek Mason 9th</p>
<p>1996 Keyshawn....Marvin Harrison/Terrelle Owens 6th and 12th</p>
<p>1995 Michael Westbrook...Joey Galloway 2d</p>
<p>1994 Charles Johnson....Isaac Bruce 6th</p>
<p>1993 Curtis Conway#</p>
<p>1992 Desmond Howard...Jimmy Smith</p>
<p>1991 Herman Moore#</p>
<p>1990 Alexander Wright....Terence Mathis 17th pick</p>

<p>Only 6-7 of the first WRs taken since 1990 turned out to be the best of their WR class.  About 25%.  This is worse than QBs.</p>
<p>So...perhaps there are a couple of lessons there for the Browns this season:</p>
<p>A. Taking a WR further down the list may not be all that bad</p>
<p>B. Never take a Michigan receiver as the first WR taken in a draft...Howard, Terrelle, Braylon all flunkies as first WR taken. At least Howard has some decent kick returning skills.</p>
<p>Also note:  just because a WR (or QB or anyone else) taken first at their position may not turn out to be the best at their position in their draft class does not mean they are a bust.</p>
<p>Like Sammy Watkins, Demarious Thomas, Santonio Holmes, Keyshawn Johnson. All good...perhaps even outstanding players....just someone else surpassed them.</p>
<p>Though, also there have been plenty of outright busts at the 1st WR position: Charles Rogers, Justin Blackmon, Braylon imo, etc. </p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">As noted in another thread.....what this particular list may have to take into account is the QBs throwing to these guys.   A. Brown, M. Wallace, Burris, etc. had BR at QB.  Harrison/Wayne etc. had Peyton. Some had Brady.   So there is a factor in this.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593728</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593728</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:12:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:08:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593724">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>We'll see Gip if Hue &amp; company view Wentz or Goff as franchise quarterbacks. Our odds are certainly better than reaching for guys like Weeden or Manziel. (I don't think Quinn had the flaws of the previous two, but I just had a strong gut feeling he was seriously going to bust) I like the fact if someone jumps to #1 overall to take a quarterback, we still get a top prospect if we have both of them rated equally.</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">The Tits want a king's ransom they say to trade for the #1 pick.  I heard on the radio that some teams are so hot on Goff that they might be willing to do that. Do you think that could happen?</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593725</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593725</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:08:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:42:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593523">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><span style="color:#800000">OK.....but, as noted....so many on here are saying..."If now instead of taking the dregs of the first round....like JMZ/Weeden/Quinn...we can now get the top prospect at QB because of our #2 position, ergo, we are going to get a great franchise QB!! Hallelujah, Glory Be, Va Va Voom"......well</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">yea, we are in a better position than we have been in the past with those guys......but our chances go up to having the franchise player we want from like 10-15% to 38%.   Better, yes.   A sure thing...by no means.</span></p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>We'll see Gip if Hue &amp; company view Wentz or Goff as franchise quarterbacks. Our odds are certainly better than reaching for guys like Weeden or Manziel. (I don't think Quinn had the flaws of the previous two, but I just had a strong gut feeling he was seriously going to bust) I like the fact if someone jumps to #1 overall to take a quarterback, we still get a top prospect if we have both of them rated equally.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593724</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593724</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:42:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:34:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593721">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><span style="color:#800000">And what happened to Retard for Retard.  Gettin's soft on us are you?  </span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Or, do you think that since it appears the Browns are turning a new leaf, that you should do so as well.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">For all we know, you are going to give Vagitron and the other Steeler fan vermin on here their real names back.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">(err...wait....in the quoted part it does say Retard).</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Still....do you want to turn that leaf.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">(otherwise I agree with what you say)</span></p>
</div></blockquote>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>I haven't changed anything, when I type as an Admin those changes don't apply.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>But it still should be Twatwater and Retard for the masses.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Z</strong></span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593722</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593722</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zombo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:34:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:31:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Zombo <a href="/post/593719">said</a>:</p><div>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Ya, agreed on all.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>If they redrafted it would probably go Bortles, Carr, Bridgewater with all of them going in the top half of the first round, Bortles and Carr Top 5 for sure.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>The guy we took ahead of Bridgewater AND Carr would go undrafted.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>We are Retard. At least we were Retard. Very Recently.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>We could have stayed right where we were in that draft, no draft day trades and taken:</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>#4 Khalil Mack</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>#26 Derek Carr</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>and still had the pick for</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>#35 Joel Bitionio</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Instead, we got Gilbert and Manziel, and the Raiders, who were slated one spot behind us, got Mack and Carr</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Pro Bowlers Mack and Carr.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>It is just criminal how we draft.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>It deserves its own 30 for 30 just on our dafts the past five years. It is mind blowing.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Zombo</strong></span></p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">And what happened to Retard for Retard.  Gettin's soft on us are you?  </span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Or, do you think that since it appears the Browns are turning a new leaf, that you should do so as well.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">For all we know, you are going to give Vagitron and the other Steeler fan vermin on here their real names back.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">(err...wait....in the quoted part it does say Retard).</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Still....do you want to turn that leaf.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">(otherwise I agree with what you say)</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593721</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593721</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:31:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:07:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/593713">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Bridgewater has a better CA....for what that's worth.  But by all means I agree with you that if I were picking one of them now for the future I would take Carr over Bridgewater  (and why is it that when you type Bridgewater now it comes out right instead of Twatwater?</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">This is actually one of those too soon to tell cases.  Or too close to call cases.  Arguable.  But I think the basic concept of the first QB taken in a draft of having about a 35-40% chance of being the best QB in a draft still holds.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Though...in some cases it doesn't matter.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">You would take either a John Elway #1 taken....or a Dan Marino #6 taken.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">And you would want no part really of an EJ Manuel #1 taken or a Geno Smith #2 taken.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">As someone said....this exercise is just interesting entertainment.</span></p>
</div></blockquote>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Ya, agreed on all.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>If they redrafted it would probably go Bortles, Carr, Bridgewater with all of them going in the top half of the first round, Bortles and Carr Top 5 for sure.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>The guy we took ahead of Bridgewater AND Carr would go undrafted.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>We are Retard. At least we were Retard. Very Recently.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>We could have stayed right where we were in that draft, no draft day trades and taken:</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>#4 Khalil Mack</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>#26 Derek Carr</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>and still had the pick for</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>#35 Joel Bitionio</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Instead, we got Gilbert and Manziel, and the Raiders, who were slated one spot behind us, got Mack and Carr</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Pro Bowlers Mack and Carr.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>It is just criminal how we draft.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>It deserves its own 30 for 30 just on our drafts the past five years. It is mind blowing.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Zombo</strong></span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593719</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593719</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zombo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:07:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:24:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let's apply this to another position:  Wide Receiver.   I will list the first WR taken in drafts (this time only going back to 1990), then the best WR taken in that draft....at their position....and compare.  # means first WR taken was the best:</p>

<p>2015 Amari Cooper # so far</p>
<p>2014 Sammy Watkins....Odell Beckham, 3rd  WR picked  (or could be too soon to tell)</p>
<p>2013 Tavon Austin....D'Andre Hopkins, 2d pick</p>
<p>2012 Justin Blackmon...Alshon Jeffrey 7th pick</p>
<p>2011 AJ Green/Julio Jones#....These guys picked 1 and 2 have almost identical statistics</p>
<p>2010 Demaryious Thomas.....Antonio Brown  23rd pick WR picked</p>
<p>2009 Darius Heyward-Bey....Mike Wallace 11th</p>
<p>2008 Donnie Aubrey....DeSean Jackson 7th</p>
<p>2007 Calvin Johnson #</p>
<p>2006 SAntonio Holmes...Brandon Marshall 14th </p>
<p>2005 Braylon Edwards...Roddy White 6th</p>
<p>2004 Larry Fitzgerald#</p>
<p>2003 Charles Rogers...Andre Johnson 2d</p>
<p>2002 Donte Stallworth...Deion Branch 11th</p>
<p>2001 David Terrell....Reggie Wayne 6th</p>
<p>2000 Peter Warrick...Plaxico Burris 2d</p>
<p>1999 Tori Holt#</p>
<p>1998 Kevin Dyson....Randy Moss 2d</p>
<p>1997 Ike Hilliard ...Derek Mason 9th</p>
<p>1996 Keyshawn....Marvin Harrison/Terrelle Owens 6th and 12th</p>
<p>1995 Michael Westbrook...Joey Galloway 2d</p>
<p>1994 Charles Johnson....Isaac Bruce 6th</p>
<p>1993 Curtis Conway#</p>
<p>1992 Desmond Howard...Jimmy Smith</p>
<p>1991 Herman Moore#</p>
<p>1990 Alexander Wright....Terence Mathis 17th pick</p>

<p>Only 6-7 of the first WRs taken since 1990 turned out to be the best of their WR class.  About 25%.  This is worse than QBs.</p>
<p>So...perhaps there are a couple of lessons there for the Browns this season:</p>
<p>A. Taking a WR further down the list may not be all that bad</p>
<p>B. Never take a Michigan receiver as the first WR taken in a draft...Howard, Terrelle, Braylon all flunkies as first WR taken. At least Howard has some decent kick returning skills.</p>
<p>Also note:  just because a WR (or QB or anyone else) taken first at their position may not turn out to be the best at their position in their draft class does not mean they are a bust.</p>
<p>Like Sammy Watkins, Demarious Thomas, Santonio Holmes, Keyshawn Johnson. All good...perhaps even outstanding players....just someone else surpassed them.</p>
<p>Though, also there have been plenty of outright busts at the 1st WR position: Charles Rogers, Justin Blackmon, Braylon imo, etc. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593718</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593718</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:24:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to First vs. Best on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:32:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Zombo <a href="/post/593698">said</a>:</p><div>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Not sure what you mean by better stats.</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Carr is 698 completions 1,172 attempts 7,257 yards 53 TDs 25 Int</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Bridgewater is 551 completions 841 attempts  6,150 yards 28 TDs 21 Ints</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Carr has more yards, more yards per start, more yards per attempt, nearly twice as many TDs, lower int %, much lower sack % ...</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>The only meaningful stat that Bridgewater is better is completion percentage, which is easily attributable to the fact that plays a much more conservative game on a better team with the leagues 4th ranked running game (Raiders were 29th).</strong></span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8b4513"><strong>Zombo</strong></span></p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Bridgewater has a better CA....for what that's worth.  But by all means I agree with you that if I were picking one of them now for the future I would take Carr over Bridgewater  (and why is it that when you type Bridgewater now it comes out right instead of Twatwater?</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">This is actually one of those too soon to tell cases.  Or too close to call cases.  Arguable.  But I think the basic concept of the first QB taken in a draft of having about a 35-40% chance of being the best QB in a draft still holds.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Though...in some cases it doesn't matter.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">You would take either a John Elway #1 taken....or a Dan Marino #6 taken.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">And you would want no part really of an EJ Manuel #1 taken or a Geno Smith #2 taken.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">As someone said....this exercise is just interesting entertainment.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/593713</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/593713</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:32:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>