<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Who do you think it will be?</p>

<p>If there are other suggestions I'll add them, though the only person I could think of would be Mitt 'binders full of women' Romney.</p>

<p>(will also do a Dem version and a general)</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/40055/brownsboard-predicts...republican-nominee</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 01:57:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/40055.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:06:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:47:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>So I just did a quick lookup on wikipedia for the popular vote, currently stands like this:</p>

<p>Trump: 8.25m</p>
<p>Cruz: 6.32m</p>
<p>Kasich: 2.98m</p>

<p>Didn't bother counting suspended people, but rubio came up ahead of Kasich a lot.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gftChris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:47:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:29:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The only way John Kasich sniffs the ticket is to devalue Ted Cruz. Simple politics.</p>

<p>WSS </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594783</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594783</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:29:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:25:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, it's on the internet so it must be true. Strange alliance indeed....K-Sick &amp; Trump playing games in Michigan. Here I thought the Rs delegate process made way more sense than the Ds....</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/04/john_kasich_and_donald_trump_j_1.html#incart_m-rpt-1" rel="external nofollow">http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/04/john_kasich_and_donald_trump_j_1.html#incart_m-rpt-1</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594780</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594780</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob806]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:25:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:23:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><span>Some of the hypocrisy of Donald J. Trump:</span></strong></p>

<p><span><span>Donald Trump is a con man perpetrating a fraud against Republican voters and the American public at large. Somehow, some way, Trump has convinced people that he is a right-wing Republican. He is lying. On issue after issue — from guns to taxes to immigration — Trump has consistently espoused views that reveal him to be, at best, a left-leaning narcissist whose ravenous hunger for fame is so overpowering that he is willing to forsake any core belief in order to obtain more of it. He cannot be trusted by anyone, especially movement conservatives.</span></span><br /><br /><strong>Immigration:</strong> "This extreme immigration rhetoric seems awfully hollow given that in November 2012, Trump <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Donald-Trump-Ronald-Kessler/2012/11/26/id/465363/" rel="external nofollow">told <em>Newsmax</em></a> that Mitt Romney lost in part because he was too tough on immigration. Moreover, for all of Trump's comments about the evils of undocumented workers, it seems Trump does not practice what he preaches. No less an authority than a federal district court judge has, in court documents, confirmed that the crown jewel of the <a href="http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=58644406" rel="external nofollow">Trump empire was built</a> on the back of labor performed by undocumented workers. Even now, Trump is <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/undocumented-immigrants-donald-trump-hotel-report-2015-7" rel="external nofollow">still using undocumented workers</a> at his worksites."</p>

<p>In his quest for the Republican presidential nomination, Mr. Trump has stoked his crowds by promising to bring back jobs that have been snatched by illegal immigrants or outsourced by corporations, and voters worried about immigration have been his strongest backers. But <strong>he has also pursued more than 500 visas for foreign workers</strong> at Mar-a-Lago since 2010, according to the United States Department of Labor, while hundreds of domestic applicants failed to get the same jobs.</p>

<p>Trump has claimed that the applications received were by people who were not qualified or otherwise unwilling to take the job.</p>
<p>A guest worker in the United States is bound to the employer who issued them a visa, and cannot switch jobs without an additional visa approval. Critics of the program say that these workers are effectively indentured servants.</p>

<p>If these allegations are true, they look pretty bad for Trump. I find it incredibly hard to believe that out of hundreds of applicants for a waitressing or housekeeping job that only 17 were qualified or willing to do the job. While I understand the appeal of having a captive workforce that is legally unable to leave their jobs for a better one, I personally wouldn't categorize the H2 visa program as one that makes America great.</p>

<p><strong>killing terrorists</strong>: At least Trump wants to kill the terrorists. Maybe so, but in order to do so, it would be helpful to be able to identify who they are. On an interview with conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt, Trump was unable to identify the leaders of some of the most dangerous terrorist groups in the world.</p>

<p><strong>not a conservative</strong>;</p>
<p>As Warren Buffett once said, "Writing a check separates a commitment from a conversation." This is especially true when it comes to political spending, which is, after all, speech. In this space, Trump's choices are revealing. Time and time again, Trump chose to spend his support on Democrats in general, and Hillary Clinton in particular. <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/donald-trump-donations-democrats-hillary-clinton-119071" rel="external nofollow">As federal election disclosures reveal</a>, Trump gave money to Hillary Clinton's campaigns in 2002, 2005, 2006, and 2007. Trump donated $5,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and $20,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the 2006 cycle, as compared to just $1,000 to the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee.</p>

<p>It is a testament to Donald Trump's powers of persuasion that he has managed to convince so many in the media that he is a right-wing extremist. But a leopard cannot change its spots, and Trump has not changed his political beliefs, no matter what he says or how loudly he says it. A choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is no choice at all — they are both typical, rich New York City liberals who would (further) socialize our healthcare system, raise our taxes, shrink our economy, and castrate our military.</p>

<p><strong>Second amendment</strong>: What about guns? Sure, Trump now claims he is carrying a gun off and on to keep us all on our toes, but this is a decidedly new tune for the Donald. Not so long ago, Trump supported the Clinton era assault weapons ban.</p>

<p><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Donald Trump, says we should get rid of gun free zones</strong>: However, it appears that Trump’s demand to eliminate gun-free zones may have been nothing more than a statement of pure hypocrisy. </span>According to <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/08/05/3688084/donald-trump-hotels-gun-free-zones/" rel="external nofollow">ThinkProgress,</a> Mr. Trump advocates for eliminating gun-free zones, except on his own properties.</p>

<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/08/05/3688084/donald-trump-hotels-gun-free-zones/" rel="external nofollow">ThinkProgress</a> spoke with a number of hotels and golf courses in the Trump empire and found that multiple locations were gun-free zones, even for guests with concealed-carry permits.</p>
<p>“No, we don’t allow any firearms in the hotel,” a manager at Trump International Hotel &amp; Tower Chicago told ThinkProgress over the phone.</p>
<p>Guns are also banned at Trump National Golf Club in Los Angeles. An employee at the course told ThinkProgress that “we don’t allow firearms on the property.” Asked whether that ban applies even to those with a concealed-carry permit, he said that “with a permit we still don’t allow firearms.”</p>

<p><strong>*</strong>  When it comes to political hypocrisy and intellectual inconsistency, Donald Trump deserves a gold medal. At the same time that the billionaire businessman criticizes Ford for producing some of its cars in Mexico, and threatens to stop Ford’s expansion there <em>and</em> impose a 35% tariff on Ford’s imports from Mexico, he certainly has no problem taking advantage of the global marketplace when it comes to his own businesses. For example, some of the clothing for his signature Donald J. Trump Collection is produced in Mexico and some is made in China..</p>

<p><strong>Pro life</strong>?: In 1999, Tim Russert asked Trump if he would support a ban on "abortion in the third-trimester" or "partial-birth abortion."</p>
<p>"No," Trump replied. "</p><div class="embed-wrapper"><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KHAHKGP10yc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div>." Trump explained his views may be the result of his "New York background."<p></p>
<p>During the first Republican presidential debate, Trump explained that he "evolved" on the issue at some unknown point in the last 16 years. "Friends of mine years ago were going to have a child, and it was going to be aborted. And it wasn't aborted. And that child today is a total superstar, a great, great child. And I saw that. And I saw other instances," Trump said. "I am very, very proud to say that I am pro-life."</p>

<p>When the <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/03/trump-on-flag-burning-the-superstar-who-made-him-pro-life-and-whether-hed-live-in-the-white-house/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Daily Caller</em>'s Jamie Weinstein asked Trump</a> if he would have become pro-life if that child had been a loser instead of a "total superstar," Trump replied: "Probably not, but I've never thought of it. I would say no, but in this case it was an easy one because he's such an outstanding person."</p>

<p>That Trump could go from supporting third-trimester abortion--something <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/full/print/the-lesson-of-kermit-gosnell/article/736726" rel="external nofollow">indistinguishable from infanticide</a>, something that only <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/160058/majority-americans-support-roe-wade-decision.aspx" rel="external nofollow">14 percent of Americans</a> think should be legal--to becoming pro-life because of that one experience is a bit hard to believe. If it's true, the story still indicates at the very least that Trump is not capable of serious moral reasoning.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594714</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594714</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:23:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:28:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Trump more exaggerates than he does lie.</p>

<p>"The trade deficit with China isn't $500 billion what a liar!"</p>

<p>Well, 366 billion but calling Trump a liar for saying 500 instead of 366 is just deflecting from the fact that Trump is the only one on the right side of the issue - with s plan to fix it.</p>

<p>"Tariffs lol"</p>

<p>As everybody else is scared of a trade war, China forces Boeing to build plants in China or they threaten to buy Airbus instead. They impose tariffs on our goods and straight up refuse to buy perishables after the ship arrives.</p>

<p>You realize that the big corporations who support Clinton and Cruz (Cruz has received more corporate money than anybody except Clinton FYI) - and therefore the politicians are in favor of these policies that fail us in every way. While they don't benefit the people, the small businesses, the country as a whole - they benefit the biggest sharks in the pond.</p>

<p>Trump is a nationalist and he's on the right side of the big issues, and he's hated for it.</p>

<p>If you're fed up with the way things have gone under Bush and Clinton and Bush and Obama - then you need to get on board with Trump.</p>

<p>Supporting Clinton or Cruz (especially Cruz) is only going to make it worse, much much worse.</p>

<p>I will vote for Clinton's terrible presidency every day of the week before I vote for a consumption tax imposed by the federal government, and the other disastrous Cruz policies mentioned.</p>

<p>"But Trump supported universal health care before"</p>

<p><strong><span>Ted Cruz holds the Bible high! Then he puts it down and lies.</span></strong></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594711</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594711</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:28:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:40:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/vaportrail" aria-label="Profile: vaportrail">@<bdi>vaportrail</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594690">said</a>:</p><div><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/rhSfMY3.jpg" alt="rhSfMY3.jpg" /></p></div></blockquote>

<p>If you aren't happy with Politifact there are as Trump would say huuuge amounts of other news sources calling out Trump for his lying. Bigly really.  I listed some of them which was only a small partial list.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594693</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594693</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:40:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:31:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/rhSfMY3.jpg" alt="rhSfMY3.jpg" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594690</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594690</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[VaporTrail]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:31:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:30:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594679">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>Not saying that any of it is true or not, but you do understand that PolitiFact Is an arm of the Democratic Party, or at least operatives.</p>

<p>WSS</p>
</div></blockquote>

<div>	<strong><span>“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”</span></strong><p><strong><span>― <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1244.Mark_Twain" rel="external nofollow"><span style="color:#000000">Mark Twain</span></a></span></strong></p>
</div>


<p><strong><span>Why Donald Trump's brazen lies overwhelm the press</span></strong></p>

<p><a href="http://theweek.com/articles/611581/why-donald-trumps-brazen-lies-overwhelm-press" rel="external nofollow">http://theweek.com/articles/611581/why-donald-trumps-brazen-lies-overwhelm-press</a></p>
	<strong><span>Chronicling Donald Trump’s Lies</span></strong><p><a href="http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/chronicling-donald-trumps-lies/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/chronicling-donald-trumps-lies/</a></p>
	<strong><span>Lies, Damned Lies, and Donald J. Trump</span></strong><p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/lies-damned-lies-and-donald-j.-trump/article/2001471" rel="external nofollow">http://www.weeklystandard.com/lies-damned-lies-and-donald-j.-trump/article/2001471</a></p>


<p><strong><span><a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=12&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjJgqyj2ITMAhXMMz4KHTHRC_04ChAWCCIwAQ&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fposteverything%2Fwp%2F2015%2F11%2F23%2Fdonald-trump-is-constantly-lying%2F&amp;usg=AFQjCNFBF-E8RIwrDi4zaYrssUkQqEmJzg&amp;sig2=9JUboR4tcfRUFRRiUC70FQ&amp;bvm=bv.119028448,d.cWw" rel="external nofollow"><span style="color:#000000">Donald Trump is constantly lying - The Washington Post</span></a></span></strong></p>

<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/11/23/donald-trump-is-constantly-lying/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/11/23/donald-trump-is-constantly-lying/</a></p>
	<strong><span>Katie Pavlich: Trump sending lies halfway around the world</span></strong><p><a href="http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/270344-trump-sending-lies-halfway-around-the-world" rel="external nofollow">http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/270344-trump-sending-lies-halfway-around-the-world</a></p>
	<strong><span>What Should the Media Do When Donald Trump Blatantly Lies?</span></strong>	<a href="http://fortune.com/2015/11/26/trump-lies/" rel="external nofollow">http://fortune.com/2015/11/26/trump-lies/</a>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594688</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594688</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:30:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:17:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Politifact is operated by a Hillary Clinton rag.</p>

<p>They say "well we couldn't find substantial evidence to support the claim, pants on fire"</p>

<p>Or it's a matter of exaggerating a number, 10 million versus 15 million - pants on fire.</p>

<p>80% of what they rated Cruz on his half true or below, with almost 70% being false.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594681</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594681</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:17:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:15:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Not saying that any of it is true or not, but you do understand that PolitiFact Is an arm of the Democratic Party, or at least operatives.</p>

<p>WSS </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594679</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594679</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:15:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:47:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bbedward" aria-label="Profile: bbedward">@<bdi>bbedward</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594665">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>Well to be fair I'm basing it on nearly everybody I associate with and reddit - unanimous that Cruz is worse than Trump in those circles.</p>

<p>You're saying 50% don't like Trump based on actual voting, but don't use the same logic with Cruz because he polls better against Hillary.</p>

<p>The never Cruz crowd is bigger than the never Trump crowd, you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise.</p>

<p>If you look at the real people who have voted, Trump does better with every demographic sans evangelicals. He turns out the biggest numbers, he gets the most independents, the most Democrats.</p>

<p>Frankly I don't know what you like about Cruz - aside from being an evangelical in disguise who is insanely corrupt and cheated on his wife 5 times, his policies are an absolute disaster.</p>

<p>Consumption tax, flat tax - punishes the poor and middle class. I don't want the federal government taking 10% of everything I buy.</p>

<p>Double down against Assad and Russia, I don't want WW3</p>

<p>Raise social security age, cut Medicare, abolish Obama care. Spending cuts that look good on paper but don't benefit the American people.</p>

<p>Further deregulate wall Street</p>

<p>Bolster big oil, cut any benefits for companies that work towards cleaner energy - ethanol, solar, wind - no more incentive to do that under Cruz</p>

<p>Cut incentives for companies that offer health care and other benefits to employees</p>

<p>Triple H1B visas, lowering wages and opportunities for <em>skilled</em> American workers</p>


<p>He pretends not to support the TPP because it's popular to do so thanks to Trump - but in reality as president he will change one or two words and it'll go into effect. The next president needs to tear it up completely</p>

<p>But hey, he's against abortion even in cases of rape and incest, cases where life of the mother is on the line, cases where theres pre existing conditions the child will have - like heroin addiction.</p>

<p>That convinces me, Cruz 2016</p>
</div></blockquote>	 	<strong><span>PolitiFact 2015 Lie of the Year: the campaign misstatements of Donald Trump</span></strong>
<p>PolitiFact has been documenting Trump’s statements on our Truth-O-Meter, where we’ve rated 76 percent of them <a href="http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/barely-true/" rel="external nofollow"><u>Mostly False</u></a>, <a href="http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/" rel="external nofollow"><u>False</u></a> or <a href="http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/pants-fire/" rel="external nofollow"><u>Pants on Fire</u></a>, out of <a href="http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/" rel="external nofollow"><u>77 statements</u></a> checked. <span style="color:#ff0000">No other politician has as many statements rated so far down on the dial.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#ff0000">In considering our annual Lie of the Year, we found our only real contenders were Trump’s -- his various statements also led our Readers’ Poll. But it was hard to single one out from the others. So we have rolled them into one big trophy.</span></p>

<p>To the candidate who says he’s all about winning, PolitiFact designates the many campaign misstatements of Donald Trump as our 2015 Lie of the Year.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/dec/21/2015-lie-year-donald-trump-campaign-misstatements/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/dec/21/2015-lie-year-donald-trump-campaign-misstatements/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594673</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594673</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:47:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:34:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You've got obf and cal supporting cruz and eds, vapor, logic (I think, right?) and myself supporting trump. And that is how trump can and will win. Cruz only has the cal's and the obf's of the world and they are badly outnumbered. If cruz is somehow nominated I'll drop the GOP like a hot potato. No way in hell im voting for that guy. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594666</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cysko Kid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:34:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:31:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oldbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: oldbrownsfan">@<bdi>oldbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594660">said</a>:</p>

<p>I posted the polling data from Real Clear Politics that does not support what you are saying.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well to be fair I'm basing it on nearly everybody I associate with and reddit - unanimous that Cruz is worse than Trump in those circles.</p>

<p>You're saying 50% don't like Trump based on actual voting, but don't use the same logic with Cruz because he polls better against Hillary.</p>

<p>The never Cruz crowd is bigger than the never Trump crowd, you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise. </p>

<p>If you look at the real people who have voted, Trump does better with every demographic sans evangelicals. He turns out the biggest numbers, he gets the most independents, the most Democrats.</p>

<p>Frankly I don't know what you like about Cruz - aside from being an evangelical in disguise who is insanely corrupt and cheated on his wife 5 times, his policies are an absolute disaster.</p>

<p>Consumption tax, flat tax - punishes the poor and middle class. I don't want the federal government taking 10% of everything I buy.</p>

<p>Double down against Assad and Russia, I don't want WW3</p>

<p>Raise social security age, cut Medicare, abolish Obama care. Spending cuts that look good on paper but don't benefit the American people.</p>

<p>Further deregulate wall Street</p>

<p>Bolster big oil, cut any benefits for companies that work towards cleaner energy - ethanol, solar, wind - no more incentive to do that under Cruz</p>

<p>Cut incentives for companies that offer health care and other benefits to employees</p>

<p>Triple H1B visas, lowering wages and opportunities for <em>skilled</em> American workers</p>


<p>He pretends not to support the TPP because it's popular to do so thanks to  Trump - but in reality as president he will change one or two words and it'll go into effect. The next president needs to tear it up completely </p>

<p>But hey, he's against abortion even in cases of rape and incest, cases where life of the mother is on the line, cases where theres pre existing conditions the child will have - like heroin addiction.</p>

<p>That convinces me, Cruz 2016!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594665</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:31:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:23:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594655">said</a>:</p><div><p>Cruz will get destroyed in the general election. Tea Partiers/Tea Bags/ whatever can't carry someone to the presidency. </p></div></blockquote>

<p>Whom Does America Hate More - Donald Trump Or Hillary Clinton?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2016-02-26/the-most-hated-candidate" rel="external nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2016-02-26/the-most-hated-candidate</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:23:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:16:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bbedward" aria-label="Profile: bbedward">@<bdi>bbedward</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594653">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>Yep 50% of people don't like Trump but everybody likes Ted Cruz, solid argument.</p>

<p>Most Democrats will tell you they'd rather have Trump than Cruz. Cruz gets obliterated in non red States and has been obliterated in purple states.</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>I posted the polling data from Real Clear Politics that does not support what you are saying.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594660</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594660</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:16:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:08:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Cruz will get destroyed in the general election. Tea Partiers/Tea Bags/ whatever can't carry someone to the presidency. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594655</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594655</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:55:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Yep 50% of people don't like Trump but everybody likes Ted Cruz, solid argument.</p>

<p>Most Democrats will tell you they'd rather have Trump than Cruz. Cruz gets obliterated in non red States and has been obliterated in purple states.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:55:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:38:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bob806" aria-label="Profile: bob806">@<bdi>bob806</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594637">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>While I do understand this take, it is very amusing to me that the <em>Party</em> (be it D or R btw) has more concern for their stupid platforms than the will of the people/constituents of our nation.</p>

<p>This is problem #1, and the very reason candidates like Trump and Sanders have gained traction this time around. The middle-of-the-road Ds and Rs are fed up with partisan stances, and a pompous  jerk like Romney only fueled the fire a month or so ago.</p>

<p><span style="color:#ff0000">I am no Romney fan I voted for him because the alternative was Obama. </span></p>

<p>IMHO, Romney sealed a D victory in November. I don't know if it was just his opinion, or his R party urged him to speak out, but it was probably the stupidest thing I've ever seen in a Presidential campaign. He basically told the voters of 11 primaries out of 15 states (roughly, I'm just estimating) that they are stupid for voting for Trump. So now we have K-Sick at 1 for 30 in primary wins thinking he's "got a chance." Reminds me of the famous <em>Dumb &amp; Dumber</em> quote by Jim Carrey.</p>

<p><span style="color:#ff0000">I do like Kasich. I think he has been a good governor. His argument that he is the only republican candidate the polls show consistently and by large margins of beating Clinton is accurate. BTW -The democrats have their own rigged super delegates. With republicans it is simple get 1237 delegates and you win period. If you don't get 1237 the delegates make the call. It is not who gets closer to the 1237.   I don't think anything Mittens says carries a lot of weight IMO.</span></p>

<p>I was honestly looking at the Rs (I'm a registered D who is not happy with the Obama Administration) this time around, even though I disagree with many of their planks on the platform. Well, like I said then and say again, bye bye Rs, you're a bunch of fools (<span style="color:#ff0000">the democrats are no genius's either</span>). And I'm not voting Hillary before some pile on.</p>


</div></blockquote>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594648</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594648</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:38:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:55:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oldbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: oldbrownsfan">@<bdi>oldbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594595">said</a>:</p><div>




<p><span style="color:#ff8c00">Would it be political suicide parachuting in Romney or Ryan? Maybe but they are thinking about losing the House and Senate with Trump at the top of the ticket</span>. Many of Trump's supporters are only interested in voting for Trump anyway and have no intention of voting a republican ticket. Some are democrats or people who have never voted before.</p>


</div></blockquote>
<p>While I do understand this take, it is very amusing to me that the <em>Party</em> (be it D or R btw) has more concern for their stupid platforms than the will of the people/constituents of our nation.</p>

<p>This is problem #1, and the very reason candidates like Trump and Sanders have gained traction this time around. The middle-of-the-road Ds and Rs are fed up with partisan stances, and a pompous  jerk like Romney only fueled the fire a month or so ago.</p>

<p>IMHO, Romney sealed a D victory in November. I don't know if it was just his opinion, or his R party urged him to speak out, but it was probably the stupidest thing I've ever seen in a Presidential campaign. He basically told the voters of 11 primaries out of 15 states (roughly, I'm just estimating) that they are stupid for voting for Trump. So now we have K-Sick at 1 for 30 in primary wins thinking he's "got a chance." Reminds me of the famous <em>Dumb &amp; Dumber</em> quote by Jim Carrey.</p>

<p>I was honestly looking at the Rs (I'm a registered D who is not happy with the Obama Administration) this time around, even though I disagree with many of their planks on the platform. Well, like I said then and say again, bye bye Rs, you're a bunch of fools. And I'm not voting Hillary before some pile on.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594637</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594637</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob806]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:55:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:49:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594604">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>So 52% of the voters don't want Trump. What percentage don't want Ted Cruz?</p>

<p>WSS</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>Polling Data Poll Date Sample MoE</p>
<div><span>Kasich <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=914d980dd38" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" title="®" alt="®" /></span></div>
<div><span>Clinton (D)</span></div>
<p>Spread RCP Average 2/16 - 3/10 -- -- 54.3 36.7 <span style="color:#ff0000">Kasich +17.6</span> <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/313-trump-ahead-in-fl-il-kasich-up-in-oh-clinton-ahead-in-fl-il-and-oh/" rel="external nofollow">NBC/WSJ/Marist</a> 3/4 - 3/10 2052 RV 2.2 57 36 <span style="color:#ff0000">Kasich +21 </span><a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_OH_31016.pdf" rel="external nofollow">PPP (D)</a> 3/3 - 3/4 1248 RV 2.8 52 37 <span style="color:#ff0000">Kasich +15</span> <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/oh/oh02242016_Oiu84jk.pdf" rel="external nofollow">Quinnipiac</a> 2/16 - 2/20 1539 RV 2.5 54 37 <span style="color:#ff0000">Kasich +17</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/oh/ohio_kasich_vs_clinton-4079.html#polls" rel="external nofollow">All Ohio: Kasich vs. Clinton Pol</a></p>
<div>2016 Presidential Race</div>
<div><div><div>*****************************************************************</div></div></div>
<p>General Election: Trump vs. Clinton</p>
<div>Poll Date Sample MoE<div><span>Clinton (D)</span></div>
<div><span>Trump <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=914d980dd38" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" title="®" alt="®" /></span></div>Spread RCP Average 3/16 - 4/2 -- -- 49.4 38.9 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +10.5</span> <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/misc/usapolls/us160329/MCC/General%20Election/McClatchy_Marist%20Poll_General%20Election__Complete%20Survey%20Findings_Nature%20of%20the%20Sample%20and%20Tables_April%202016.pdf" rel="external nofollow">McClatchy/Marist</a> 3/29 - 3/31 1066 RV 3.0 50 41 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +9 </span><a href="http://www.investors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Tables_Apr2016_Posting-1.pdf" rel="external nofollow">IBD/TIPP</a> 3/28 - 4/2 819 RV 3.5 47 35 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +12 </span><a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_33116.pdf" rel="external nofollow">PPP (D)</a> 3/24 - 3/26 1083 RV 3.0 48 41 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +7</span> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2016/03/23/fox-news-poll-national-general-election-32316/" rel="external nofollow">FOX News</a> 3/20 - 3/22 1016 RV 3.0 49 38 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +11 </span><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-23/republicans-in-bloomberg-poll-not-sold-on-plan-to-stop-trump-im5c37sf" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a> 3/19 - 3/22 815 LV 3.4 54 36 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +18</span> <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us03232016_Umk53pw.pdf" rel="external nofollow">Quinnipiac</a> 3/16 - 3/21 1451 RV 2.6 46 40 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +6</span> <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton-viewed-unfavorably-by-majority-cbsnyt-poll/" rel="external nofollow">CBS News/NY Times</a> 3/17 - 3/20 1058 RV 4.0 50 40 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +10 </span><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2773296-rel5a-2016.html" rel="external nofollow">CNN/ORC</a> 3/17 - 3/20 925 RV 3.0 53 41 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +12 </span><a href="http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/7714a05b-515f-4ad3-bdaa-e72a6e5f8e61.pdf" rel="external nofollow">Monmouth</a> 3/17 - 3/20 848 RV 3.4 48 38 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +10</span><p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html" rel="external nofollow">All General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Polling Data</a></p>

<p>*******************************************************************************</p>Polling Data<div>Poll Date Sample MoE<div><span>Clinton (D)</span></div>
<div><span>Cruz <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=914d980dd38" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" title="®" alt="®" /></span></div>Spread RCP Average 3/16 - 4/2 -- -- 46.2 43.4 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +2.8</span> <a href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/misc/usapolls/us160329/MCC/General%20Election/McClatchy_Marist%20Poll_General%20Election__Complete%20Survey%20Findings_Nature%20of%20the%20Sample%20and%20Tables_April%202016.pdf" rel="external nofollow">McClatchy/Marist</a> 3/29 - 3/31 1066 RV 3.0 47 47 <span style="color:#ff0000">Tie</span> <a href="http://www.investors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Tables_Apr2016_Posting-1.pdf" rel="external nofollow">IBD/TIPP</a> 3/28 - 4/2 819 RV 3.5 44 39 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +5</span> <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_33116.pdf" rel="external nofollow">PPP (D)</a> 3/24 - 3/26 1083 RV 3.0 45 42 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +3</span> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2016/03/23/fox-news-poll-national-general-election-32316/" rel="external nofollow">FOX News</a> 3/20 - 3/22 1016 RV 3.0 44 47 <span style="color:#ff0000">Cruz +3 </span><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-23/republicans-in-bloomberg-poll-not-sold-on-plan-to-stop-trump-im5c37sf" rel="external nofollow">Bloomberg</a> 3/19 - 3/22 815 LV 3.4 51 42 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +9</span> <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us03232016_Umk53pw.pdf" rel="external nofollow">Quinnipiac</a> 3/16 - 3/21 1451 RV 2.6 45 42 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +3</span> <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton-viewed-unfavorably-by-majority-cbsnyt-poll/" rel="external nofollow">CBS News/NY Times</a> 3/17 - 3/20 1058 RV 4.0 47 44 <span style="color:#ff0000">Clinton +</span><span>3</span> <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2773296-rel5a-2016.html" rel="external nofollow">CNN/ORC</a> 3/17 - 3/20 925 RV 3.0 48 48 <span style="color:#ff0000">Tie</span> <a href="http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/7714a05b-515f-4ad3-bdaa-e72a6e5f8e61.pdf" rel="external nofollow">Monmouth</a> 3/17 - 3/20 848 RV 3.4 45 40<span style="color:#ff0000"> Clinton +5</span><p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_cruz_vs_clinton-4034.html#polls" rel="external nofollow">All General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton Polling Data</a></p>

<p>******************************************************</p>


</div>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594608</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594608</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:49:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:23:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>So 52% of the voters don't want Trump. What percentage don't want Ted Cruz?</p>

<p>WSS </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594604</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594604</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:23:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:57:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/594569">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>I think without John Kasich Trump sails to a victory.</p>
<p>Two different alternatives.</p>
<p>WSS</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>I think Kasich helps Cruz in the northeast for sure. It gives people another option who don't want Cruz or Trump. Even the best case scenario Ed posted showing Trump up with 48 percent of the vote in Pennsylvania shows over half the electorate does not want Trump. The argument is then well they want Trump more than Cruz or Kasich and that might be right in Pennsylvania in the republican primary but in a general election the one who does worst in the republican primary Kasich does the best in the general. That is the key. The demographics and type of voters you will have in the general are not your typical republican primary voters.</p>

<p>I would not put past the GOP in trying to get either Romney or Ryan the nomination. Cruz isn't liked by the establishment much better than Trump. If it goes to two or three ballots I would favor Cruz getting the nomination. If it gets up past five the GOP parachuting in Romney or Ryan looks better. I think Trump has to win on the first ballot.</p>

<p>Would it be political suicide parachuting in Romney or Ryan? Maybe but they are thinking about losing the House and Senate with Trump at the top of the ticket. Many of Trump's supporters are only interested in voting for Trump anyway and have no intention of voting a republican ticket. Some are democrats or people who have never voted before.</p>

<p>Mark Levin said (before he joined the never Trump movement) he thought by the time the election came around most people who say they will never vote Trump which is about 30 percent would dwindle to 5 percent and probably be a wash with the Bernie Sanders never vote Clinton crowd. That might be accurate who knows. I do know that I have voted republican since 1980 with Reagan and voted for every republican candidate since. I won't vote for Trump and I hate Clinton. If the choice is between two New York liberals that is no choice to me. I know many others who feel the same way but we will see how all this plays out. I think there are still some twists and turns to come.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594595</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594595</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:57:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:31:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Rubio is establishment, Cruz is establishment.</p>

<p>If you like corrupt, sleazy DC politics then Cruz is your only option at this point on the Republican side</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:31:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee on Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:26:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Nice opinion letter on why a former Rubio supporter is choosing Cruz over Trump:</span></p>

<p><strong><span>Why I’m Voting For Cruz In Colorado’s Republican State Convention</span></strong></p>

<p>I am what you might call an accidental conservative. I grew up in another country – Australia – where the prevailing culture is much more left-wing than the political environment of the United States.</p>

<p>I moved here in my mid-twenties as a news reporter, and at first, I sympathized with liberal politicians and liberal causes. I was used to left-wing politics, after all, and it was the path of least resistance in the newsrooms where I worked.</p>
<p>But over time, that started to change. After growing up in a country where the government plays a much bigger role in daily life, and the private economy is much smaller, living in America taught me a simple truth: When the government is smaller, and the economy is bigger, life is better.</p>
<p><span><img height="0" src="http://engine.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/i.gif?e=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&amp;s=Zv-HfM1xXLpw2VBE--4yfXbJCQA" width="0" alt="i.gif?e=eyJhdiI6MTI3MjYzLCJhdCI6MTMsImJ0" /></span></p>
<p>Today, I am a proud U.S. citizen and a vocal advocate for the system of limited government made possible by our Constitution. I am also a husband and a father – and I’m worried. I fear my two young girls, and children all across America, will be denied the freedom and opportunity they deserve if the next president fails to honor the Constitution and our nation’s founding principles.</p>

<p>For this reason, I will be supporting Ted Cruz at the Republican State Convention in Colorado Springs on Saturday.</p>
<p>To be clear, Cruz was not my first choice. I supported Marco Rubio before he dropped out. Cruz is the only candidate in the race who can secure the Republican nomination, run as a conservative who will honor the Constitution, and win the general election. He understood our anger at Washington, D.C. – and acted on it – years before the presidential campaign even began. And for anyone who believes in limited government, Cruz is a far better choice than the current frontrunner, Donald Trump.</p>
<div><span><img height="0" src="http://engine.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/i.gif?e=eyJhdiI6ODgxMzMsImF0IjoxMywiYnQiOjAsImNtIjozODk4MjAsImNoIjoxNzg0MSwiY2siOnt9LCJjciI6MTI2MzE0MiwiZGkiOiI3MDY0MWMwYmQ5MjQ0N2JhOTQyMjM0ZmRhYmQ2YWYxOSIsImRtIjoxLCJmYyI6MTU5NjQxNywiZmwiOjEzMDgyNTAsImlwIjoiMTYyLjE1OC43Mi4xMDYiLCJrdyI6ImFnZTwyMCxhZ2UyMC00MCxhZ2U0MCxhZ2U2MCxhZ2U-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&amp;s=JNVIL_DaPZ35TOWLxtqrz-82uqg" width="0" alt="i.gif?e=eyJhdiI6ODgxMzMsImF0IjoxMywiYnQi" /></span></div>
<p>Trump would increase the size, scope and power of the federal government in a number of deeply troubling ways. Today, the national debt is $19 trillion and rising, with roughly two-thirds of federal spending devoted to Medicare, Social Security and other entitlement programs. But Trump has no plan to reform entitlements, even though they will saddle our children with crushing federal debt. He’s even bragged that he won’t touch entitlements, unlike “every other Republican” in the race.</p>

<p>Trump has also suggested even more entitlements are on their way. “I am going to take care of everybody,” Trump said while attempting to explain how he would replace Obamacare. And for those who don’t buy insurance? “The government’s going to pay for it,” he said. When challenged, Trump attacks like he’s a big-government liberal: “We’re not going to let people die in squalor because we are Republicans.”</p>

<p>Even more disturbing, Trump talks like someone who believes the president is above the law. When asked how he would respond if the military refused to carry out illegal orders from the White House, Trump replied: “They’re not going to refuse me … If I say do it, they’re going to do it. That’s what leadership is all about.”</p>

<p>Trump has also threatened news organizations with new libel laws so people can “sue you like you’ve never got sued before.” Only a candidate who doesn’t know or doesn’t care about the Constitution – and specifically the First Amendment, which prohibits the federal government from abridging the freedom of the press – would make such a threat. And speaking of press freedoms, Trump still refuses to fire or even discipline his campaign manager, who was charged with battery for allegedly manhandling a reporter at a news conference.</p>

<p>Of course, Trump has become famous for backtracking on his past statements and changing his positions until it’s practically impossible to tell where he stands from one day to the next. But the underlying message is crystal clear: Big government is fine as long as Trump’s in charge.</p>

<p>But big government isn’t fine. We don’t need a “strongman” in the Oval Office who will do even more damage to our constitutional republic. Simply put, we need to get back to basics, starting with the principles of limited government that created this great nation.</p>
<p>You don’t have to agree with Cruz about everything. But in this moment, he’s the only presidential candidate who can steer the Republican Party and the nation in the right direction. Please, if you believe in limited government, vote Cruz.</p>

<p><em>Simon Lomax is a Boulder County delegate to Colorado’s Republican State Convention and a candidate for national delegate.</em></p>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<br /><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/08/why-im-voting-for-cruz-in-colorados-republican-state-convention/" rel="external nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/08/why-im-voting-for-cruz-in-colorados-republican-state-convention/</a>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/594587</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/594587</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:26:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>