@mld-woody said:

Did you not read Cal's google search results? You're about to get another dosage I suspect.

Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.

Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad

@stinkhole said:

If we head that far down the rabbit hole, I will owe you guys a beer....and likely a plane ticket to somewhere that isn't o.k. with kids getting molested.

@westside-steve said:

"Claiming something isn't normal and therefore bad"

Uh so who exactly did that, and if you didn't think it was me why put it in the response to my post?

WSS

Because you mockingly referenced something I had said in the past regarding left handed people and tall people. I said THAT in reference to others on here saying something wasn't normal and therefore it's bad.

All caught up now?

@logicisforsquares said:

A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

Stuart

True, but mental conditions have always been used as a defense. I am not saying Sandusky gets a pass, what I'm implying is shouldn't the way he's wired be taken into consideration? Its not his fault he has an attraction to kids.

This is the same consideration we give to homos and trannys...and yes, I understand that homos and trannys don't have victims and are not on trial, but at its core pedophilia, homo, and trans are all are rooted in the way a person is wired.

Make no mistake, I am playing devils advocate here. I am not a proponent of "pedo civil rights". That's a liberal thing.

Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.

@logicisforsquares said:

Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.

Or harming anyone. Or causing pain to anyone.

We're just talking repulsed.

WSS

@clevfan4life said:

And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church

"We don't have to relocate them anymore!"

@westside-steve said:

Aren't those diseases?

WSS

I would use that wording if I was a drunk or a junkie trying to avoid jail time. Otherwise, you choose to be either of those things.

@westside-steve said:

Repulsed. That's the bottom line.

WSS

Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.

@logicisforsquares said:

A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

Aren't those diseases?

WSS

@logicisforsquares said:

I don't think that drum will get beat too hard. Even the most liberal people with kids would be repulsed by the idea of someone banging their toddler.

Repulsed. That's the bottom line.

WSS

@mld-woody said:

How about this, do you think there is any push being made for pedofiles to be "the next civil right"? It looks like your starting down your normal path of going way off topic, so I'll try to steer us back.

Stuart

There is a "push", but the movement is in its infancy.

An op-ed from the NY Times since you consider this a reliable news source.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=4&assetType=opinion

@stinkhole said:

Stuart

It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.

So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?

A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

@stinkhole said:

Stuart

Tell that to PETA.

Or Hindus

They are dumb shits. If the cow that is supposed to be reincarnated grandma is the only thing between me ane starvation, sorry grandma.

@westside-steve said:

There is?

Like being left-handed or tall?

WSS

Yes there is. Do you need it explained to you?

@mld-woody said:

Except there is a very clear line here between homosexuals and pedofiles.

Stuart

It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.

So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?

They just mindlessly/stupidly peck...again and again again and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and againagain and again.....

@logicisforsquares said:

Cows =/= people

Stuart

Tell that to PETA.

Or Hindus

So who wants to join the Army and go to war against some of these countries?

In California where is sex is forbidden below the age of 18 should the parents of the younger teens who beat off being arrested for child endangerment?

WSS

Uh so who exactly did that, and if you didn't think it was me why put it in the response to my post?

WSS