protecting it... is too much. as it's a huge plus if it tries to undo everything in our country...

that they don't identify with.

@clevfan4life said:

I think he characterized it as a necessary evil, one which he would not apologize for. He's right, ur wrong...as usual..

Stuart

You "think" he characterized it a necessary evil, but not sure? That says it all right there, the lengths at which you dickwads will go to defend that scumbag ....as usual.

@jbluhm86 said:

@pumpkin-eater said:

And the punctuation mark known as a question mark is used to denote a question, not a statement.

@clevfan4life said:

"Ur" is commonly used internet shorthand in todays smartphone world. So "ur" point is once again null and void

And the punctuation mark known as a question mark is used to denote a question, not a statement.

"Read this carefully as it may save your life or the life of a or friend. In the next few days, some or all of the cities named on the reverse side will be destroyed by American bombs. These cities contain military installations and workshops or factories which produce military goods. We are determined to destroy all of the tools of the military clique which they are using to prolong this useless war. But, unfortunately, bombs have no eyes. So, in accordance with Americas humanitarian policies, the American Air Force, which does not wish to injure innocent people, now gives you warning to evacuate the cities named and save your lives. America is not fighting the Japanese people but is fighting the military clique which has enslaved the Japanese people. The peace which America will bring will free the people from the oppression of the military clique and mean the emergence of a new and better Japan. You can restore peace by demanding new and good leaders who will end the war. We cannot promise that only these cities will be among those attacked but some or all of them will be, so heed this warning and evacuate these cities immediately.

It was not evil. It saved millions of lives and Japanese civilization. Only a numbskull would think it was evil.

"One said:

It's a good thing, look how beautiful it is over there now. Before it was a shithole and it's the best thing that ever happened to Japan. It ended a lot of turmoil for everyone".

I thought about what he said and he was right. Also he added it wouldn't be a bad idea to do the same in Iraq.

What is this new narrative that pre ww2 japan was like cavemen or some shit? They were building dome of the worlds most advanced military weaponry. Their battleships were legendary.

@calfoxwc said:

except obamao DID refer to it as evil, per the op,

and obaMao IS an anti-America scumbag idiot,

and you are wrong.

I think he characterized it as a necessary evil, one which he would not apologize for. He's right, ur wrong...as usual. Imnot a big fan of his but on this one there is no debate. Nuclear detonations on a civilian population are evil. In tje case of ww2 a prolonged invasion of japan would have been equally as evil and no less destructive...perhaps more.

and obaMao IS an anti-America scumbag idiot,

and you are wrong.

@pumpkin-eater said:

Like I said, obummer could piss on the tomb of the unknown soldier and libdiots would find no fault in his actions.

Except he didn't. And you're still wrong

@pumpkin-eater said:

Like I said, obummer could piss on the tomb of the unknown soldier and libdiots would find no fault in his actions.

Obama could lay a wreathe on it and genuflect infront of it and you right wing looney house monkeys would be find some hidden muslim insult in his actions.

@pumpkin-eater said:

I could be as big of an asshole as you libtards and point out that "ur" is not a real word, and therefore you are an idiot. But that would be deflecting from the issue being discussed.

"Ur" is commonly used internet shorthand in todays smartphone world. So "ur" point is once again null and void

@calfoxwc said:

throwing insults in response to thrown insults

Insult started with the 'liberal idiots' comment above my last post.

It's clear it was a sarcastic and rhetorical question - quickly proven wrong. No point to back track.

See, you throw a boomarang. It flies around, and comes back,

and whonks you in the nose.

You get mad, you blame the boomarang. Not good.

@calfoxwc said:

@mld-woody said:

He was shown to be completely incorrect.

He'll now just start throwing insults and try to change the subject