Just to illustrate that you don't need a gun to kill

And here are the numbers from Jihad.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2015

@bbedward said:

They're tragically dead you dumb fuck, have some respect.

Oh nnoooowww its too soon. No lectures from anyone on this board of degenerates when it comes to ehat is "too soon". You PC libtard you.....?

@clevfan4life said:

https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/christy-sheats-8.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all

No smash?

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/27/people-are-losing-their-minds-over-trumpgirlsbreaktheinternet/

Fap to this instead

No smash?

@clevfan4life said:

Yeah but how hot was the one daughter?

Not as hot as you're going on like

Unless you want to register every gun serial number and owner in a database and make sure it's more like the process of a car title, but you'd never get that by the NRA. And what could you do about the hundreds of millions of guns already in the US - not much.

psych ward/officially designated as having a mental disorder....

and having that put on a list of "can't buy guns, etc" list.

http://csgv.org/issues/guns-and-mental-health/

and one more time - there is NO GUN SHOW LOOPHOLE where gun shows don't use

background checks on gun purchases.

All licenses gun dealers are required to send info in to the background check system before any

gun purchase can be approved.

The exception is, there are a few private gun owners, who sell a couple of their guns at those shows, at least

there used to be. I don't believe they have to use the background check system.

I believe private sales should happen outside of gun shows. But, I don't believe in forcing a couple hundred million

people who go through the background check system every time they pass on their guns to their heirs.

That would require a national registration system to track all that - and that is just the system that a gov

needs to take all guns, one way, or another - as in, through the courts or through raising the price of gun

ownership up so high, that no one can afford to keep them anymore. And surely no one believes that the left

hasn't earned the reputation for ulterior motives with their "gun control" agenda. The left isn't denying it anymore.

loved and cherished her daughters.

Not all people with significant mental health problems... are

officially identified as such.

Going afterr 200 million gun owners to try to stop this rare madness, is stupid.

A cop or two have been found to murder...

Mental health problems that never surfaced violently before, drugs, alcohol, who knows.

Suppose she arsoned her house down and murdered her daughters that way?

Would anybody support banning flammable liquids? Matches? wooden homes? torches?

@mld-woody said:

So if she did have a history of mental illness it is perfectly acceptable for her to have access to guns in the home?

She didn't murder them in their sleep. A family argument erupted and she grabbed a gun and started to shoot as they ran away. If she grabbed a knife we probably wouldn't have three dead.

Did I miss something? Because I don't recall in either story that a history of mental illness was involved.

So hypothetically, no. If she has a history of mental illness than she lied on the background check to get the firearms. An argument can be made that HIPAA laws need to be changed to accommodate for having immediate access to mental health records during a background check.

If the police had charged her with a domestic disturbance charge during one of the many visits they would have legally been able to relieve her of any firearms in the home and it would red flagged during any background checks.

She didn't murder them in their sleep. A family argument erupted and she grabbed a gun and started to shoot as they ran away. If she grabbed a knife we probably wouldn't have three dead.