@tour2ma said:

lmao... got a little weak near the end, but the little song saved it...

Even if he stays cool for the next few months the Hillary loving media has still got a backlog oh shit to hyperventilate about.

WSS

@mld-woody said:

I was going to post that as well. Pretty funny. I love Bad lip reading

@oldbrownsfan said:

MHO is this will ultimately be The Donald's undoing.

@westside-steve said:

Uh, yes. I don't see party regulars as being as open-minded as you do.

Sounds like a personal problem...

@oldbrownsfan said:

OldBrownsFan, on 24 Jul 2016 - 10:18 AM, said:

Given the interest rates, it is hard to discern a difference.

_____________________________________________________________

For sure. If they get much lower we will be paying the banks to keep our money.

Plagiarist!

@vaportrail said:

Clev, I'm pretty much pissed off at the entire system, and I'm rooting for Trump to throw a wrench into the entrenched, corrupt mess.

Got that out of my system with Ross Perot.

In an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Monday, Reince Priebus was asked about the boos Bernie Sanders received while speaking to his followers when he said, “We have got to elect Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine.”

“My reaction to it is they’re ticked off, they have a right to be, they were lied [to]—and Hillary Clinton is their nominee based on false pretenses,” he answered. “And so, I mean, I’m not sure whether they have any mechanism to vote their conscience on the floor and rectify the problem or not, but clearly, these people were lied to in the most personal way, so, yeah, they’re mad, and they should be.”

It’s a good thing Priebus’s candidate didn’t lie to voters, like accusing a fellow candidate’s father of assassinating JFK or anything.

It should be noted that grassroots Republicans fought tooth and nail, going through proper channels and following stated RNC rules to call for a floor vote on “voting their conscience.”

Those votes were not allowed by Reince Priebus and Donald Trump’s mob-like thugs, in violation of their own rules.

http://politistick.com/reince-priebus-tells-democrat-voters-to-vote-their-conscience/#

@vaportrail said:

Clev, I'm pretty much pissed off at the entire system, and I'm rooting for Trump to throw a wrench into the entrenched, corrupt mess. Hundreds of millions have been spent particularly to stop him, so the powers that be really don't want to see what happens if he takes charge. He will also give all the SJWs an aneurysm if he's elected. That's good enough for me.

Beyond that, I have no idea what a Trump presidency will be. He might be good, he might be bad. I think checks and balances will prevent any of his crazier platforms from taking hold. I'd rather take a chance on him actually changing things up, rather than a guaranteed 4 more years of the same with Hillary.

@oldbrownsfan said:

So if you rail against the banking industry you shouldn't use banks and just put money under your mattress?

Given the interest rates, it is hard to discern a difference.

_____________________________________________________________

For sure. If they get much lower we will be paying the banks to keep our money.

@tour2ma said:

Ummmm... no...

Some may...

Most might "hate" some...

Same is true of the Republican party.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Ummmm... no...

Some may...

Most might "hate" some...

Same is true of the Republican party.

@oldbrownsfan said:

Disappointing those in the Trump camp, most of all the candidate himself, who want to savage Cruz and end his career, the results showed 40% of those surveyed thought Cruz did the right thing; 32% opposed it, and 12% were undecided.

That would seem more like the results of a poll of the Texas delegation...

@westside-steve said:

Keep in mind that the Super PAC supporting Ted Cruz decided to put out that hot semi nude picture of Trump's wife to insult her.

Bad angle?

@oldbrownsfan said:

So if you rail against the banking industry you shouldn't use banks and just put money under your mattress?

Given the interest rates, it is hard to discern a difference.

Beyond that, I have no idea what a Trump presidency will be. He might be good, he might be bad. I think checks and balances will prevent any of his crazier platforms from taking hold. I'd rather take a chance on him actually changing things up, rather than a guaranteed 4 more years of the same with Hillary.

@vaportrail said:

I also got Bernie

While we are being honest I couldn't give less of a fuck about regulating the banks.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Reminds me of the hypocrisy of Trump who pandered in Iowa primary with support for even more subsidies for corn Ethanol that is one of the biggest government boondoggles going today. Nothing about subsidies for ethanol will make America great again but Trump was more interested in votes. Cruz and Rand Paul were the only ones with integrity to go into Iowa and take the most unpopular position possible in a state like Iowa that benefits from those subsidies. So much for the myth that somehow Trump will go to Washington and not be influenced by special interest groups................

@clevfan4life said:

He was my first choice going into the primaries, much as that may surprise you.

@clevfan4life said:

So your assertion that they're going to vote for a flaming cockhole like Trump just cause they hate Hillary is absurdly stupid. They're just going to stay home or write in some other candidate. Trump is not going to woo Bernie supporters with the same demagogue'ing rhetoric that he used to enrapture the simple minds of his base constituency. It's true they give a fuck about Ted Cruz but Trump showing what an ill tempered sour old grouse he is, isn't going to go over well with them.

If Trump gets 10-15% of Bernie supporters (like me), he'll win the election. If they (you) decide to sit out or vote Gary, which I'm guessing is around 30-40% of them, then that is also helpful. Both of those demographics are now increasing with the selection of Kaine as VP and the DNC email leaks. Hillary made her bed by giving a big middle finger to progressives. Now she gets to sleep in it.

And here's my isidewith profile just for fun. I truly wanted to vote for Bernie, but he's demonstrated time and time again that he's a limp-wrist pushover, and that's not a good quality for a president.

@oldbrownsfan said:

So if you rail against the banking industry you shouldn't use banks and just put money under your mattress?

Yes.

Or STFU with your phony bitching about the banks.

And GS.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

So if you rail against the banking industry you shouldn't use banks and just put money under your mattress?

The absolute KING of the personal attacks is Donald Trump and Cruz did condemn the ad by the Super Pac... what more can he do when he had nothing to do with it.

to most of the other 17 candidates and including a reporter with palsy????

WAAYY before Cruz....

then I think the super pac attack is a non issue as well

edit - 16 candidates

And whether he got a sweetheart deal or not isn't the point. If these guys are bitching and crying and whining about Goldman Sachs and Wall Street but they're good enough to do business with... Just like Hillary.

And again, yes it's time to go after Hillary.

WSS

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/poll/demand-answers/?source=62

@westside-steve said:

None of the candidates have any control over Super Pacs and by law cannot work or coordinate their campaigns with Super Pacs. If there was any evidence the Cruz campaign had anything to do with the photo of Melania Trump I think Trump would have them up on charges ASAP. Also Trump lied and said the Cruz campaign had bought the rights to that photo which USA today investigated and stated there was no truth to that either.

Cruz's wife did work for Goldman Sachs (still does) and Cruz did take a loan out from Goldman Sachs to help finance his campaign. There is zero evidence Cruz got a sweetheart deal but got a loan at same rates like anyone and used his house and assets for collateral. This is just a total non story.

And here is the biggest problem: The primary is over so it serves no purpose for Trump to continue in attacking republican candidates like Cruz and Kasich. He is not running against them now...his opponent is Clinton.