time or another...

because sometimes, I'm full of baloney, and sometimes wrong, like I was wrong

about Cruz and Trump earlier on.

The difference is, not many just sit back and make personal insults against

anybody who sees things differently, without justifying why they disagree,

and you tend to be the only one who think personal attacks just because

makes you look intelligent. I just got tired of your constant antagonistic,

demeaning knee jerkie on most any issue where you disagree, and vs anyone who

you usually disagree with.

I don't nickname anybody else on the board woodpecker, because you are the only one.

Have a nice day voting for higgardly, your queen of liberal crap. and when it comes to

my threads, either comment about the content, yeah or ney/whatever...

or just STFU.

@calfoxwc said:

...woody won't quit drive by screwing with my posts, and dissing me, so I

figured I have to remind him again to quit. There is consequences to be

faced when you are a bitchy, smart ass drive by birdbrain,

and woodpecker used up all the grace I ever had to offer up to ignore him,

a long time ago...

...and let me know when you grow the nads to tell him to knock it off because you are tired of it,

and I'll make sure to have a snack and a cup of coffee while I sit back and watch

woody play the victim again.

http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=39882

It's very well established that woody doesn't get a simple, civilized

comment or three, so, he gets a constant payback often, now.

I believe that not one of all the learning disabled students in Ohio,

not ONE, is as learning disable as woody.

woody won't quit drive by screwing with my posts, and dissing me, so I

figured I have to remind him again to quit. There is consequences to be

faced when you are a bitchy, smart ass drive by birdbrain,

and woodpecker used up all the grace I ever had to offer up to ignore him,

a long time ago.

and encouraging him - like you are, doesn't help anything, and let me know when

you grow the nads to tell him to knock it off because you are tired of it,

and I'll make sure to have a snack and a cup of coffee while I sit back and watch

woody play the victim again.

@jbluhm86 said:

"but, but, but.... Woody started it"

@calfoxwc said:

in this election, anybody here could poll 13 percent,

except for the woodpecker - he wouldn't muster

a 1 percent. They don't vote.

You know Cal, if you really want to slob Woody's knob that badly, all you'd probably have to do is ask him. The whole "insult woody to disguise my true feelings for him" motif that you do in nearly every thread is getting a bit worn out. Most people quit that shit in elementary school, dawg.

except for the woodpecker - he wouldn't muster

a 1 percent. They don't vote.

@pumpkin-eater said:

They agreed on social issues but not on economics. I thought people pretty well knew that.

@westside-steve said:

three would be better than two, but four would be better still. I mean, there's a functional limit on how many relevant parties you can have - a hundred parties with different policies and one percent of the vote each is kinda pointless. But as I said, the system of a president who can circumvent the will of the democratically elected legislatures is not one that lends itself to compromise and collaboration.

@pumpkin-eater said:

He's a fake. He's big government and pro-establishment. He's actually a liberal, so he'll poach more votes from crooked Hillary than anyone else.

http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/25/gary-johnsons-new-mexico-fiscal-record-d

With a 3 Party you're almost guaranteed that the majority will be unhappy.

WSS

I'd prefer to see 1-on-1, but it likely ends up a 3-way.

@bbedward said:

Libertarians are pro-free trade, but the TPP is a lot more than a simple "free trade" agreement - otherwise it wouldn't be thousands of pages long.

But voters are morons for the most part.

They have no idea.

WSS

@clevfan4life said:

Srsly.

@bbedward said:

Gary Johnson is a wacko

I wouldn't mind seeing him in the debates, but I hate that the third party candidates are so fringe

I mean, you're giving me a choice between a wacko, a loudmouth, and a corrupt shill. Not really many options to go around.

@vaportrail said:

I guarantee the establishment rewrites the rules to prevent it if Gary hits threshold.

Oh, you know they're going to try to, but I think the cat is out of the bag on how corruptly-ran the Commission for Presidential Debates really is, and people are taking notice.