<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Corrupt Media]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://therightscoop.com/caught-red-handed-wikileaks-email-shows-politico-reporter-colluding-with-hillary-camp/" title="Permanent Link to CAUGHT Red-handed!! Wikileaks email shows POLITICO reporter COLLUDING with Hillary camp!!" rel="external nofollow">CAUGHT Red-handed!! Wikileaks email shows POLITICO reporter COLLUDING with Hillary camp!!</a></p>

<p>Wikileaks has released an email which shows Politico reporter Ken Vogel colluding with the Hillary Clinton camp by sending them his articles before publication.</p>

<p>From<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-dnc-emails-wikileaks-2016-7" rel="external nofollow"> the Business Insider:</a></p>
<div>An influential reporter at Politico made an apparent “agreement” with the Democratic National Committee to let it review a story about Hillary Clinton’s fundraising machine before it was submitted to his editors, leaked emails published by WikiLeaks on Friday revealed.</div>
<div>Reporter Kenneth Vogel sent an advanced copy of his story to DNC national press secretary Mark Paustenbach in late April.</div>
<div>The email’s subject line read: “per agreement … any thoughts appreciated.”</div>
<div> </div>

<p>There it is, I don’t see what more evidence we need to show the media helps Democrats. How many other scumbag “objective” reporters are doing exactly the same thing?</p>
<p>Amazingly, neither Politico or Ken Vogel have responded to the damaging revelations</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/41016/corrupt-media</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:25:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/41016.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:04:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Corrupt Media on Sat, 23 Jul 2016 06:16:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/617309">said</a>:</p>

<p>So who did Rience favor. The Donald said he wasn't being treated fairly for a good while early...</p>

<p>And who DWS favored doesn't matter, if she did not act on that favoritism. Get back to me when there is evidence of her thumb on the scale...</p>







<p>*Awaiting an image of a severed thumb on a scale*</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bush? Or whoever the party nominated?</p>

<p>The e-mails talked about tipping the scales, the debate schedule that was setup for nobody to watch the candidate who hasn't done a press conference in 230 days.</p>

<p>The scales have been - and still are weighted against Trump.</p>

<p>Not even close to the same with Hillary</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/617315</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/617315</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 06:16:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Corrupt Media on Sat, 23 Jul 2016 05:03:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bbedward" aria-label="Profile: bbedward">@<bdi>bbedward</bdi></a> <a href="/post/617297">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>I'm pretty sure you can say that nobody in the RNC favored Trump until he won - including Rience</p>

<p>DWS favored Hillary since the beginning</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>So who did Rience favor. The Donald said he wasn't being treated fairly for a good while early...</p>

<p>And who DWS favored doesn't matter, if she did not act on that favoritism. Get back to me when there is evidence of her thumb on the scale...</p>







<p>*Awaiting an image of a severed thumb on a scale*</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/617309</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/617309</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 05:03:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Corrupt Media on Sat, 23 Jul 2016 04:21:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/617295">said</a>:</p>
<p>"Controlled the media"... link please...</p>


<p>Well, yeah... and Rience was always neutral? Neutrality, or rather lack of it is only an issue if it is acted upon.</p>


<p>Articles are often sent to their subject for comment... for the sake of accuracy. When the e-mail surfaces with instructions to whitewash this or that, then you'll have a story.</p>


<p>Funny thing is Politico has been accused in the past of being "right-leaning" by progressive groups including Media Matters... something Brietbart and The Daily Caller (safe to say "right-leaning" news sources???) has more recently disputed.</p>

<p>When accused of bias by both ends of the spectrum... maybe you are getting it right?</p>
</blockquote>I'm pretty sure you can say that nobody in the RNC favored Trump until he won - including Rience
<p>DWS favored Hillary since the beginning </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/617297</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/617297</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 04:21:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Corrupt Media on Sat, 23 Jul 2016 04:19:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>"Controlled the media"... link please...</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bbedward" aria-label="Profile: bbedward">@<bdi>bbedward</bdi></a> <a href="/post/617223">said</a>:</p><div><p>DWS has always been a Hillary supporter</p></div></blockquote>

<p>Well, yeah... and Rience was always neutral? Neutrality, or rather lack of it is only an issue if it is acted upon.</p>


<p>Articles are often sent to their subject for comment... for the sake of accuracy. When the e-mail surfaces with instructions to whitewash this or that, then you'll have a story.</p>


<p>Funny thing is Politico has been accused in the past of being "right-leaning" by progressive groups including Media Matters... something Brietbart and The Daily Caller (safe to say "right-leaning" news sources???) has more recently disputed.</p>

<p>When accused of bias by both ends of the spectrum... maybe you are getting it right?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/617295</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/617295</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 04:19:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Corrupt Media on Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:31:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary's previous emails released by the FBI showed that she controlled the media.</p>

<p>Also the DNC pushing Hillary was never a big secret, it's been confirmed with the emails though.</p>

<p>DWS has always been a Hillary supporter</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/617223</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/617223</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbedward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:31:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>