http://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse/bombshell-hillarys-ties-russia

so its more - look at what Trumps sayin - instead of what the crook, liar hag is DOing!

I was wondering why he said this

because our collective attention spans wont let us think about Russia's military ambitions

past our need to find and collect peekachews....?

check this out - http://www.g-a-i.org/u/2016/08/Report-Skolkvovo-08012016.pdf

“From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism”

@logicisforsquares said:

Side note: there is about zero chance Hillary tries to come to a reasonable relationship with Russia after accusing them of somehow trying to keep her from winning.

Yup

Side note: there is about zero chance Hillary tries to come to a reasonable relationship with Russia after accusing them of somehow trying to keep her from winning.

"Trump Too Offensive To Work With Russia While Trump Is Working For Russia To Start War With Russia Because He Is Too Uninformed About International Relations To Know How To Deal With Russia And Has A Long History Of Dealings With Russia"

@bbedward said:

What was the deal with the CNN interviewer having a pile of Hillary signs in the background?

I also liked how he got perennially BTFO for 5 minutes then said "I'd love to have this discussion with you all day, but we're out of time!"

Then they promptly cut back to a panel of "analysts" who continued talking shit about Trump.

have you tried rubbing it into ur bald spots?

I also liked how he got perennially BTFO for 5 minutes then said "I'd love to have this discussion with you all day, but we're out of time!"

Then they promptly cut back to a panel of "analysts" who continued talking shit about Trump.

*******************

@vaportrail said:

Was Trump's rhetoric (or Obama's lack thereof, for that matter) responsible for the Russian military involvement against Georgia, Chechnya, and Ukraine?

No. The fact is that we aren't going to do a damn thing to protect non-NATO countries. If Russia wants to reabsorb their former Soviet bloc countries, the US will not do anything to stop them because that's how you start a world war.

As far as publicly calling out NATO, it's not nearly as detrimental as you're making it out to be. NATO's Supreme Commander agrees with Trump (source) for crying out loud. The US, UK, and Poland are the only ones who are paying the agreed upon 2% of their budget on defense of all NATO nations. The rest of the countries are freeloading off of US military power; it's time for a reassessment of that whole situation.

Again, if you're interested in learning more about this situation check out Dan Carlin's Common Sense podcast episode 305. He talks precisely about individual European nation economies, and how they should be strong enough to build militaries that can stand up to Russia.

ic how that works.

@diehardbrownsfan said:

Спасибо товарищу Путину[/size]

Спасибо товарищу Путину[/size]

Stuart

Thanks tovarichoo Putin

What is Tovarichoo Diehard??

Спасибо товарищу Путину

@clevfan4life said:

Was Trump's rhetoric (or Obama's lack thereof, for that matter) responsible for the Russian military involvement against Georgia, Chechnya, and Ukraine?

No. The fact is that we aren't going to do a damn thing to protect non-NATO countries. If Russia wants to reabsorb their former Soviet bloc countries, the US will not do anything to stop them because that's how you start a world war.

As far as publicly calling out NATO, it's not nearly as detrimental as you're making it out to be. NATO's Supreme Commander agrees with Trump (source) for crying out loud. The US, UK, and Poland are the only ones who are paying the agreed upon 2% of their budget on defense of all NATO nations. The rest of the countries are freeloading off of US military power; it's time for a reassessment of that whole situation.

Again, if you're interested in learning more about this situation check out Dan Carlin's Common Sense podcast episode 305. He talks precisely about individual European nation economies, and how they should be strong enough to build militaries that can stand up to Russia.

Cohen says the media at large is doing a huge disservice to the American people by ignoring the substance of Trump's arguments about NATO and Russia, and buying the Clinton campaign's simplistic smear that Trump is a Russian "Manchurian candidate."

"That reckless branding of Trump as a Russian agent, most of it is coming from the Clinton campaign," Cohen said. "And they really need to stop."

"We're approaching a Cuban Missile Crisis level nuclear confrontation with Russia," he explained. "And there is absolutely no discussion, no debate, about this in the American media."

"Then along comes, unexpectedly, Donald Trump," he continued, "Who says he wants to end the New Cold War, and cooperate with Russia in various places... and --astonishingly-- the media is full of what only can be called neo-McCarthyite charges that he is a Russian agent, that he is a Manchurian candidate, and that he is Putin's client."

"This is a moment when there should be, in a presidential year, a debate," he said. "And that is not what we are given in the media today."

"Let's go back to what you said Trump said about NATO," Cohen also said. "Trump said early on, he wanted to know, 60 years after its foundation, what was NATO's mission today. 100 policy wonks in Washington since the end of the Soviet Union, 25 years ago, have asked the same question. Is NATO an organization in search of a mission?"

"That's a legitimate question --but we don't debate it. We don't ask it. We just say, oh, Trump wants to abandon NATO."