<![CDATA[I'd do this in a heartbeat]]>The article doesn't clearly explain what would happen, but basically the Browns would draft Sanchez at 5 if he's there or the browns would trade the 5th for Washington's 13th, 3rd rd, 5th rd, and a 1st round next year.

Cleveland Receives:

13th overall pick

3rd round pick

5th round pick

2010 1st round pick

Washington Receives:

Mark Sanchez

With the 13th I'd grab Rey Rey in a heartbeat

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/4234/i-d-do-this-in-a-heartbeatRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 02:50:46 GMTTue, 21 Apr 2009 02:49:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:24:12 GMT]]>My roommate brought up a great point about this. Washington's FO was willing to dish out two first rounders for Ochocinco... Could this really happen?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/63187https://brownsboard.com/post/63187Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:24:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:00:58 GMT]]>Hey he mite be right. It could be a great impact on our franchise.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/63146https://brownsboard.com/post/63146Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:00:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:32:17 GMT]]>

@shepwrite said:

Sanchez was on NFL network yesterday... and acts like a seasoned veteran, comfortable and funny. I see what GMs are seeing, a kid who is mature way beyond his years or experience level.

If he's on the board when the Browns are on the clock, we'll have trade offers.

i saw that too and you apparently read people like shit. funny? he was uncomfortable and giggling the whole time, and pretentious at best.

you see what GM's are seeing? you're ridiculous.

to steal from you "your USC slip is showing shep..."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/63135https://brownsboard.com/post/63135Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:32:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:50:26 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

We very well might.

We will know 5 days and 6 hours from now.

Is that all? I think i'll take a very long nap then.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62900https://brownsboard.com/post/62900Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:50:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:33:12 GMT]]>We very well might.

We will know 5 days and 6 hours from now.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62895https://brownsboard.com/post/62895Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:33:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:23:18 GMT]]>

@shepwrite said:

Sanchez was on NFL network yesterday... and acts like a seasoned veteran, comfortable and funny. I see what GMs are seeing, a kid who is mature way beyond his years or experience level.

If he's on the board when the Browns are on the clock, we'll have trade offers.

Good, i hope we take them.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62891https://brownsboard.com/post/62891Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:23:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:00:32 GMT]]>the kid is still pretty immature, Quinn was definitely more polished coming out. these teams are insane to consider that trade.

a heartbeat wouldn't even be fast enough for me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62841https://brownsboard.com/post/62841Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:00:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:38:25 GMT]]>To good to be true, thats the shit dreams are made of. If it does happen then hells yeah, i hope we have the extra money to pay all these draft picks

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62825https://brownsboard.com/post/62825Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:38:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:38:02 GMT]]>Agreed, the difference between 5 and 13 this year isn't going to make or break our team, add in the other picks for this draft and I say it's a winner. A first round pick next year added to the mix is the bit that makes this unbelievable to me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62824https://brownsboard.com/post/62824Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:38:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:33:35 GMT]]>Even without next years pick I would do it.

No matter what value chart used, it doesn't matter because the values on each are overvalued when it comes to this years draft.

If a team wants to trade down, they better not be holding a value chart in their hand, because they aren't going to get that with a host of teams willing to move back and very few wanting to move up.

Teams moving back will be doing so at a steep discount.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62823https://brownsboard.com/post/62823Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:33:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:21:35 GMT]]>Thats an insane trade and there's no way it happens, but I'd jump all over it, even without the 2010 1st rounder.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62819https://brownsboard.com/post/62819Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:21:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:55:10 GMT]]>i would take that in a heart beat. however i don't think that the gm in washington is as dumb as the gm in chicago. 2 first rounders, a third and 5th is way too much for sanchez. i would love to pull off this trade but there has to be little chance of it happening. if you take away next year's pick then it is more likely to go through.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62817https://brownsboard.com/post/62817Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:55:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:21:43 GMT]]>Theres a better then good chance that pioli will snag sanchez with the same thing in mind..ahhhh just a few more days and we will know who is doing what...😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62815https://brownsboard.com/post/62815Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:21:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:25:32 GMT]]>

@kardiackid26 said:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...raft/index.html

"I've heard Cleveland (picking fifth) and Washington have already discussed a deal if Sanchez is still on the board at five"

Hmmm. But Sanchez's stock seems to be rising faster than anyone elses. Sounds like he won't be there. But if he is, I'd do the deal in a second as well.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62814https://brownsboard.com/post/62814Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:25:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:51:50 GMT]]>Your pick is only worth what someone is willing to give you for it. Draft value chart be damn. I'd take the #13, 3rd and 5th and a mid rounder next year.

At #13 Maybin, Jackson, Moreno or Jenkins. Any are as good as you will get at #5 at 1/4 of the cost. With 4 picks in the top 80 you can fill needs at OLB, WR, Safety and Center. Then still have picks to go after Jennings or Brinkley.

Teams who want Sanchez look like they want to trade above Seattle. That to would be okay because Curry would have a chance to fall to us.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62799https://brownsboard.com/post/62799Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:51:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:16:07 GMT]]>The trade scenario King mentions is one involving Kansas City and Washington. There's a 500 point difference between KC's pick and ours - the equivalent of the 40th pick in the draft.

Also, King uses the old draft value chart, which overvalues high picks. And he mentions that one of his sources claims that Snyder's not willing to give up next year's first round pick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62792https://brownsboard.com/post/62792Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:16:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:53:11 GMT]]>I'd take that deal in a heartbeat and then some.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62787https://brownsboard.com/post/62787Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:53:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'd do this in a heartbeat on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:50:23 GMT]]>http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...raft/index.html]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/62784https://brownsboard.com/post/62784Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:50:23 GMT