@clevfan4life said:

Just heard that yesterday... Ruppert's ex?

@bbedward said:

He was with a private company that was employed by pro-Russian politicians.

Don't think he's a secret Russian agent, more so he just likes $ wherever it comes from.

Someone manufacturing headlines? Charges, if any, will be for failure to register as an agent of a foreign government for about a two-year period. In that sense he was an "agent" who kept his activity "secret", but far cry from Grant as played by Robert Shaw... or was it Mike Pence?

What's odd is Manafort had registered as required by law during other time periods...

@tour2ma said:

Any more thoughts on this bb in light of recent developments?

He was with a private company that was employed by pro-Russian politicians.

Don't think he's a secret Russian agent, more so he just likes $ wherever it comes from.

Facebook Falsely Claims Colin Powell Cleared Hillary In Email Case

@tour2ma said:

Good catch....

Usually the MSM playbook calls for waiting 7 -10 paragraphs... depending on the importance of the position held.

She also released a bunch of embarrassing emails last year with threats to release more if she was prosecuted.

Kane's office released scores of pornographic emails last year, setting off a wave of firings and resignations, including a state Supreme Court justice. Fina and Costanzo weren't identified as senders or receivers of those emails.

Kind of convoluted, but Fina and Costanzo were her prosecutors who were after her for leaking Grand Jury testimony as I understand it.

Once again... it's not so much "the act" as the "cover up".

Of course that's how the game is played.

WSS

Usually the MSM playbook calls for waiting 7 -10 paragraphs... depending on the importance of the position held.

She also released a bunch of embarrassing emails last year with threats to release more if she was prosecuted.

Kane's office released scores of pornographic emails last year, setting off a wave of firings and resignations, including a state Supreme Court justice. Fina and Costanzo weren't identified as senders or receivers of those emails.

Kind of convoluted, but Fina and Costanzo were her prosecutors who were after her for leaking Grand Jury testimony as I understand it.

Once again... it's not so much "the act" as the "cover up".

Yahoo News

Pennsylvania's attorney general found guilty in perjury case

NORRISTOWN, Pa. (AP) — Pennsylvania's attorney general showed little emotion Monday night as she was convicted of leaking grand jury secrets and lying about it under oath.

In calling her a flight risk, the judge ordered Kathleen Kane, 50, to surrender her passport and threatened to jail her if she retaliated against the once-trusted aides who testified against her.

"The court is concerned, especially with respect to her potential to flee, particularly with her going to Haiti (in 2014) in the middle of her office's tumult, and leaving no one watching the store," Judge Wendy Demchick-Alloy told Kane's lawyers.

Kane's political consultant, testifying with a grant of immunity, changed his grand jury testimony last week to tell jurors that he had "conspired" with Kane to leak the grand jury material and then frame her chief deputy for the crime.

Kane, a first-term Democrat who had never held elected office, enjoyed a brief honeymoon period in 2013 before her agency descended into chaos as she feuded with officials inside and outside of the department.

@jbluhm86 said:

So, Wikileaks are only valid when they cast shadows on Clinton. But when they show possible misdeeds of Trump staffers, they are "dishonest media".

Who's referring to wikileaks as dishonest?

I was always partial to http://www.signalcable.com/ ... nice performance/price-point value...