<![CDATA[Rey still on the board]]>While I wasn't high on him and felt he was the 3rd best LB coming out of USC, I am quite surprised he is still on the board.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/4380/rey-still-on-the-boardRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:31:31 GMTSat, 25 Apr 2009 23:53:00 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Rey still on the board on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:07:25 GMT]]>

mikeyP72 said:

Honestly confused, i think Robiskie woiuld haev been there at 50... we should have taken Rey.

I agree 100%. Rey was the pick at 36. We need some help on D.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/64889https://brownsboard.com/post/64889Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:07:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rey still on the board on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:06:27 GMT]]>WE COULD HAVE GOTTEN mACHLIN...REY AND ROBISKIE...............HORRIBLE

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/64887https://brownsboard.com/post/64887Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:06:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rey still on the board on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:05:44 GMT]]>

mikeyP72 said:

Honestly confused, i think Robiskie woiuld haev been there at 50... we should have taken Rey.

Maybe we didn't want Rey

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/64886https://brownsboard.com/post/64886Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:05:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rey still on the board on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:01:28 GMT]]>fkn sick to my stomach..........after all the draft picks and trades we don't take rey.......AAAAAAAAAAAAaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh FK FK FK FK FK

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/64879https://brownsboard.com/post/64879Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:01:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rey still on the board on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:54:16 GMT]]>I think its because of the doubts of him not being able to play the 3 downs. For first round and early second teams are wanting players that are gonna change the team dramatically. Not play 2 downs really well then have to be pulled.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/64868https://brownsboard.com/post/64868Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:54:16 GMT