<![CDATA[SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left]]>One of the things I usually hear about homosexuality is that gays were born that way. The bible clearly lists homosexuality as a sin so the bible must be wrong because they were born they way they are and have no control over it and science has proven it. Apparently science has not:

"Well, this will cause a few liberal heads to explode, especially in light of the fact that liberals take great pride in their adherence to science as the be all and end all of every discussion.

Now science is meddling with one of their pet causes: sexual orientation."

The cultural Marxists would have us believe that gender is fluid and sexual orientation is something people have no control over.

Yeah. About that.

A report by two renowned researchers on Monday has concluded that there is no scientific basis to believe that gay or transgendered people are “born that way.”

http://www.redstate....w-liberal-left/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/43859/shots-fired-new-research-challenges-sacred-cow-of-the-liberal-leftRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:00:56 GMTTue, 23 Aug 2016 14:52:36 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:09:54 GMT]]>Oh you should def watch more of it. Entertaining doesnt begin to describe....

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/630311https://brownsboard.com/post/630311Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:09:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:06:27 GMT]]>just looked it up under certain poster criteria. only watched about 3 seconds and quit.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/630158https://brownsboard.com/post/630158Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:06:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:55:10 GMT]]>cal, those were some satanic folk....how did you come across that video given that it's only got 100 views?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/630082https://brownsboard.com/post/630082Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:55:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:54:31 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

and this makes 6 threads with the same weird youtube video no one is going to watch.

Congrats on contributing nothing to any of those threads and looking like an idiot.

dude i watched it. omg. What in the all fuck that was awesomeness. Only 105 views? srsly? that shit shoudl be on tosh i'm dead serious. hashtag winning is all i can say about those people. I am rolling.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/630081https://brownsboard.com/post/630081Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:54:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:53:32 GMT]]>just letting you know you started being an asswhole again.

you don't get away with it anymore. That's it, weasel faced woodpecker.

Note - I'm not the only one calling you a woodpecker, not even today.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629922https://brownsboard.com/post/629922Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:53:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 04:57:32 GMT]]>and this makes 6 threads with the same weird youtube video no one is going to watch.

Congrats on contributing nothing to any of those threads and looking like an idiot.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629843https://brownsboard.com/post/629843Sun, 28 Aug 2016 04:57:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 03:44:41 GMT]]>

" rel="external nofollow">▶ 10:04

Feb 3, 2010 - Uploaded by Satansdendarkmetal

Starring: Stevey Drunkalot... Jonny Crackhits... Joe Coffeegood... Trudy Jointstalker... Host - Buddy Roachclip.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629820https://brownsboard.com/post/629820Sun, 28 Aug 2016 03:44:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 03:30:15 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

is there some "my posts are the most stupid" contest I don't know about?

It isn't really a contest, you're destroying everyone in the standings.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629810https://brownsboard.com/post/629810Sun, 28 Aug 2016 03:30:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 03:03:14 GMT]]>is there some "my posts are the most stupid" contest I don't know about?

cleve is winning with a vengence. enough already. it's boring

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629794https://brownsboard.com/post/629794Sun, 28 Aug 2016 03:03:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:05:21 GMT]]>Cause nambla only pisses us off cause #paternalfeelings. In reality theres zero scientific reason little boys shouldnt be buggered regularly by grown men. I mean if the boys are old enough to jerk off clearly its time for them to service 60 year old teaveling musicians..........oh wait

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629738https://brownsboard.com/post/629738Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:05:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:38:01 GMT]]>The fact this derailed into a NAMBLA discussion is fucking hilarious. And typical.

- Consent. The issue is obviously consent. The law is what it is right now, regardless of other times or countries. If you disagree with the age of consent, great, but that really has no effect on the gay marriage issue.

- Genetics vs environment. I haven't actually dug into the study, so who knows how legitimate it is. Regardless, whether it is genetic or not, it really doesn't matter. I don't care if your old story book says it is a sin. Your religion doesn't dictate other's lives. There is no reason to not legalize gay marriage. "It is weird to me" means jack fucking shit.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629717https://brownsboard.com/post/629717Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:38:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:48:08 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

It's not that, if you seriously don't understand then repeatedly explaining it to you isn't going to help. That's okay.

WSS

Okie dokie steve ur just too advanced for me apparrntly. That turd i see is apparently a gold nugget im just not enlightened enough to realize it

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629332https://brownsboard.com/post/629332Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:48:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:41:45 GMT]]>It's not that, if you seriously don't understand then repeatedly explaining it to you isn't going to help. That's okay.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629328https://brownsboard.com/post/629328Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:41:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:27:31 GMT]]>Yeah i know you see the ridiculous road this was about to wander down and if u go too far people start to see that hey maybe this clev guy got ole wss pegged right afterall. I know where you were fixin to end up btw, wasnt hard to crystal ball that setup.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629325https://brownsboard.com/post/629325Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:27:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:21:31 GMT]]>Sorry Cleve you're wasting my time now. We'll discuss something else in the future mayby.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629324https://brownsboard.com/post/629324Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:21:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:15:17 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Tell you what let's make it clear and you can answer as you see fit.

If in fact consent is paramount in your opinion why shouldn't it be illegal for any human regardless of age to have a relationship with someone whose IQ is significantly higher or lower. Let's say 135 dating a person 90.

Is a person with an IQ of 90 able to consent to a person of much higher intelligence? Yes or no?

WSS

Are you seriously asking me if someone with an avg iq is able to consent to sexual relations with someone with a genius iq? I feel a typical steve coming so lemme go get my ER scrubs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629322https://brownsboard.com/post/629322Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:15:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:50:43 GMT]]>So nothing. I will take that as a surrender.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629316https://brownsboard.com/post/629316Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:50:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:43:48 GMT]]>Im just saying its not hard in the sligjtest to find a west side lying around these forums. This place needs a bed pan just for ur stuff let alone some of the other incontinent types lurking around

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629311https://brownsboard.com/post/629311Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:43:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:42:07 GMT]]>Tell you what let's make it clear and you can answer as you see fit.

If in fact consent is paramount in your opinion why shouldn't it be illegal for any human regardless of age to have a relationship with someone whose IQ is significantly higher or lower. Let's say 135 dating a person 90.

Is a person with an IQ of 90 able to consent to a person of much higher intelligence? Yes or no?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629308https://brownsboard.com/post/629308Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:42:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:41:36 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

That response is as devoid of logic or rebuttal as it is poorly written.

Perhaps the latter is due to typos.

WSS

Oh i think chris did fine on that rebuttal theres really nothing for me to add exvept i think you struggle with wanting to bang some underage girl so you formulate some typical steven when the topic comes up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629307https://brownsboard.com/post/629307Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:41:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:36:20 GMT]]>

@clevfan4life said:

I had to go back about one page to find ur stupid shit. Took me seconds. Archiving your stupid shit would require a bot im dead serious

That response is as devoid of logic or rebuttal as it is poorly written.

Perhaps the latter is due to typos.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629306https://brownsboard.com/post/629306Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:36:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:33:55 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Oh please. I understand that some folks who pound the table and shout science when deriding people of faith have a hard time admitting the are compelled to make up reasons to support their own emotions and prejudices.

There is a perfectly normal and natural point in the life of any mammal where they become sexual beings.

It makes us angry to think that our 14 year old might have desires but that's life.

If consent was really a big deal to you you find some way to Outlaw masturbation by 14 and 15 year olds. Or you might make it illegal for anyone to have sex with someone whose IQ isn't within 15 points of their own.

Or education and income levels further apart than maybe 15 or 20%. Or maybe an 18 year old woman should be locked up for having sex with a 60-something year old man who would obviously have a harder time resisting. He can't consent.

Just man up and admit that NAMBLA pisses you off grosses you out and stirring up your natural feelings of anger and protectiveness.

WSS

I had to go back about one page to find ur stupid shit. Took me seconds. Archiving your stupid shit would require a bot im dead serious

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629304https://brownsboard.com/post/629304Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:33:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:33:27 GMT]]>I think it's pretty apparent that you have nothing.

You haven't really counted anything I've said aside from just ad hominem attacks and such.

I'm giving you the opportunity to put your money where your mouth is. Pick one of my arguments or statements that you believe is patently incorrect and that you have debunked in this thread. Not just something that upset you.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629303https://brownsboard.com/post/629303Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:33:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:30:47 GMT]]>All of them, literally. You know i wasnt the one that came up with rhe typical steve right? Like other people had been saturated with your constant specious arguments and spurious corrolaries that they eventually were like "oh steve is being typical steve today".

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629302https://brownsboard.com/post/629302Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:30:47 GMT