<![CDATA[Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc]]>http://constitution.com/latest-scientific-research-says-homosexuals-not-born-way-transgenderism-not-supported-science/

Why do so many liberals reject science? 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/43877/latest-scientific-report-nope.-not-born-that-way-etcRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 02:48:17 GMTThu, 25 Aug 2016 15:28:19 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:36:52 GMT]]>I'm glad we're focusing on the important issues.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629004https://brownsboard.com/post/629004Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:36:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:35:59 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

it wasn't debunked, it was argued against with rationalizations.

It wasn't a "study", it was a "study of studies"...

a lot like clinton's "definition of "is" is"

liberals quibble over terms and redefine them to suit.

"wasn't peer reviewed"... really. So, how to you get a review by peers

when peers don't like the results of the study? they'll just bash it

superficially, and reject it.

It's how liberals roll. They will protect their liberal narrative like a mother bear and it's cubs.

They argue against it.... with (wait for it) rationalizations.

And the 'study of studies' bit gave me a huge laugh.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629003https://brownsboard.com/post/629003Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:35:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:36 GMT]]>it wasn't debunked, it was argued against with rationalizations.

It wasn't a "study", it was a "study of studies"...

a lot like clinton's "definition of "is" is"

liberals quibble over terms and redefine them to suit.

"wasn't peer reviewed"... really. So, how to you get a review by peers

when peers don't like the results of the study? they'll just bash it

superficially, and reject it.

It's how liberals roll. They will protect their liberal narrative like a mother bear and it's cubs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/629002https://brownsboard.com/post/629002Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:12:45 GMT]]>Is this not the same source as the other thread we have going on right now?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/628988https://brownsboard.com/post/628988Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:12:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:42:44 GMT]]>Another gem brought to you by the ethical folks at tje costitution

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/628966https://brownsboard.com/post/628966Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:42:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:42:16 GMT]]>Denunked invalid study. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2016/08/23/the-new-atlantis-study-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-thats-not-a-study/

Not peer reviewed, written by bums who parsed and pulled what they wanted from carious other studies. So not science

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/628965https://brownsboard.com/post/628965Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:42:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Latest scientific report - nope. not born that way, etc on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:29:28 GMT]]>Well see you can't ask a baby if it's gay so...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/628961https://brownsboard.com/post/628961Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:29:28 GMT