<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[TSN LOVES Alex Mack]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>TSN ranks Alex Mack as the #1 Center of this draft and projected for round 1. </p>

<p>
<b><u>SKILL SET</u></b> </p>
<p>
<i><b>BEST INTANGIBLES</b></i></p>
<p>
<i><b>Alex Mack - California</b></i>Mack is actually the best in all of these categories (best intangibles, best run-blocker &amp; best pass blocker), standing head and shoulders above the class; his quickness and excellent blocking technique are superior.</p>

<p>
More:</p>
<p>
"At the Senior Bowl, Mack was dominant and showed why he has a real shot at being a first round pick.  While this year's class of Ceters is deep, there is a significant drop-off between Mack and the rest of the group."</p>

<p>
In Lindy's Draft Guide he's the 2nd ranked Center but hailed as the Prototype for run blocking with this written about him: "Big enough for a potential move to guard. Mack likes to get under the pads of his man, put him on the ground and look for the next defender to hit."</p>

<p>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>

<p>
While Fraley was scrappy and gave it a valiant effort, let's face it - Philly upgraded him 3 years ago.  Maybe I'm being a HOMER but we couldn't have problem solved this position any better than getting the #1 guy.</p>
<p>
<i><b>- Tom F. </b></i></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/4390/tsn-loves-alex-mack</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 16:45:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/4390.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:44:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:38:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lumbergh" aria-label="Profile: lumbergh">@<bdi>lumbergh</bdi></a> <a href="/post/65229">said</a>:</p>tough day for a good guy in Hank.  But this will help DA and Jamal get back on track.  Can't fault the pick.</blockquote>
<p>
DA? Did we get a running back? or are you talking about the backup QB?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65240</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65240</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:38:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:01:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>tough day for a good guy in Hank.  But this will help DA and Jamal get back on track.  Can't fault the pick.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65229</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65229</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lumbergh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:01:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:03:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/cimo." aria-label="Profile: cimo.">@<bdi>cimo.</bdi></a> <a href="/post/65122">said</a>:</p>I like the pick but it needs a complement. Not much reason for a run blocking mauler if you have no run game. If we get a new running back to put behind him, I'll feel much better. Massaquoi just didn't make sense.</blockquote>

<p>
I agree, but it is a 2 way street.  Pretty average backs can look pretty darn good with big holes to run through.</p>

<p>
We still have today...we may still be able to get some fresh legs if you don't think the guys we have can run through a gap.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65204</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65204</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ballpeen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:03:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:59:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I like the pick but it needs a complement. Not much reason for a run blocking mauler if you have no run game. If we get a new running back to put behind him, I'll feel much better. Massaquoi just didn't make sense.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65122</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65122</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[CIMO.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:59:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:58:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tobalaz" aria-label="Profile: tobalaz">@<bdi>tobalaz</bdi></a> <a href="/post/65118">said</a>:</p>I wanted Mac or Woods because Hank was just getting manhandled out there.  Center was a hole, Hadnot simply wasnot and it was a great pickup.<p>
We walked away with the top rated center in the draft and 2 new targets for the starting qb (and if anyone starts screaming DA I'm going to laugh my ass off on this one).</p>
<p>
I'm still a little queezy about the right side but I can live with it.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Plus a starting Safety and a DE</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65120</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65120</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[YtownBrownsBacker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:58:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:51:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I wanted Mac or Woods because Hank was just getting manhandled out there.  Center was a hole, Hadnot simply wasnot and it was a great pickup.</p>
<p>
We walked away with the top rated center in the draft and 2 new targets for the starting qb (and if anyone starts screaming DA I'm going to laugh my ass off on this one).</p>
<p>
I'm still a little queezy about the right side but I can live with it.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65118</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65118</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobalaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:51:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:36:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flugel" aria-label="Profile: flugel">@<bdi>flugel</bdi></a> <a href="/post/65039">said</a>:</p>TSN ranks Alex Mack as the #1 Center of this draft and projected for round 1. 
<p>
<b><u>SKILL SET</u></b> </p>
<p>
<i><b>BEST INTANGIBLES</b></i></p>
<p>
<i><b>Alex Mack - California</b></i>Mack is actually the best in all of these categories (best intangibles, best run-blocker &amp; best pass blocker), standing head and shoulders above the class; his quickness and excellent blocking technique are superior.</p>

<p>
More:</p>
<p>
"At the Senior Bowl, Mack was dominant and showed why he has a real shot at being a first round pick.  While this year's class of Ceters is deep, there is a significant drop-off between Mack and the rest of the group."</p>

<p>
In Lindy's Draft Guide he's the 2nd ranked Center but hailed as the Prototype for run blocking with this written about him: "Big enough for a potential move to guard. Mack likes to get under the pads of his man, put him on the ground and look for the next defender to hit."</p>

<p>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>

<p>
While Fraley was scrappy and gave it a valiant effort, let's face it - Philly upgraded him 3 years ago.  Maybe I'm being a HOMER but we couldn't have problem solved this position any better than getting the #1 guy.</p>
<p>
<i><b>- Tom F. </b></i></p>
</blockquote>

<p>
I think they realized they needed to upgrade the position and knew that Wood and Mack might be gone at #36.  So, I think they made a super pick.  The guy is a stud and I don't care what big name was still on the board.  </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65110</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65110</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[YtownBrownsBacker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:36:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:42:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oconrecon" aria-label="Profile: oconrecon">@<bdi>oconrecon</bdi></a> <a href="/post/65059">said</a>:</p>You know,  I like O-line.
<p>
In the last two years, we've drafted Thomas, signed Steinbach, and now Mack in the middle. </p>

<p>
It'll help Quinn, thus it'll help BE and the new guys, and Jamal should have a better year with this line.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Good point!  It also sets up the following players competing for 2 starting spots on the Right side:</p>
<p>
Tucker, St Clair, Hadnot, Womack and possibly even Fraley.    </p>

<p>
I LIKE the Jets players we got in exchange for the trade with NY.  We got 2 proven players with starting experience and a backup QB as we added another pick. You could sense Sanchez was going to be the trigger point of a nice trade for somebody in this draft.  Understanding we had holes to fill across the board, this REALLY worked out well for us.</p>

<p>
Mack won the Draddy Award, which is college football's academic version of the Heisman Trophy.  Since your Center is usually responsible for all the oline calls - you want that kind of intelligence at that position.</p>

<p>
We needed WRs and landed 2 in the 2nd round.  We also got a pass rusher so they  We head into day 2 with 4 more picks.</p>
<p>
<i><b>- Tom F. </b></i></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65069</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flugel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:42:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:24:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oconrecon" aria-label="Profile: oconrecon">@<bdi>oconrecon</bdi></a> <a href="/post/65059">said</a>:</p>You know,  I like O-line.
<p>
In the last two years, we've drafted Thomas, signed Steinbach, and now Mack in the middle. </p>

<p>
It'll help Quinn, thus it'll help BE and the new guys, and Jamal should have a better year with this line.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
and the stole him from the Steelers.  Mack and Wood were both gone when Pitts. went to pick.  The kid is a beast and can play guard.  He will be able to handle those NTs in our division.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65062</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65062</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[YtownBrownsBacker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:24:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to TSN LOVES Alex Mack on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:16:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You know,  I like O-line.</p>

<p>
In the last two years, we've drafted Thomas, signed Steinbach, and now Mack in the middle. </p>

<p>
It'll help Quinn, thus it'll help BE and the new guys, and Jamal should have a better year with this line.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/65059</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/65059</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OconRecon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:16:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>