I didn't know anything about Aleppo, nor would I expect many people to until the ambush.

WSS

Everyone is just stunned at the seemingly potheaded response from Gary Johnson this morning to what should not be that difficult a question about ISIS.

Gary doesn't deserve a new thread, so whatever

@pumpkin-eater said:

It was a reference to the same act of trolling as before. Not a new instance.

Look, we get it, you want to protect your buddy Ed. That's admirable. That doesn't change the fact a troll was a troll and he bit hard. There's a reason he dropped out of that thread right after, he knows what happened.

@mld-woody said:

I think Hilary is a shit candidate. I think Trump is a shit candidate.

Are you joining the group of posters on here that lack basic reading comprehension skills?

I just assumed because I saw you here

@bbedward said:

I think Hilary is a shit candidate. I think Trump is a shit candidate.

Are you joining the group of posters on here that lack basic reading comprehension skills?

@mld-woody said:

It was clearly a troll. It seems like it really got to you too.

But that's fine. I'm getting a better idea of what this demographic Trump supporters looks like. The internet, anti-SJW group. An internet based Napoleon complex in a way.

Don't worry, I don't care that you're a cuck beta. It is ok.

Hey can you answer in the other thread about Hillary telling the FBI she's literally re-tarded. I'm wondering how a cuck would spin it.

@mld-woody said:

It was clearly a troll. It seems like it really got to you too.

But that's fine. I'm getting a better idea of what this demographic Trump supporters looks like. The internet, anti-SJW group. An internet based Napoleon complex in a way.

Don't worry, I don't care that you're a cuck beta. It is ok.

But that's fine. I'm getting a better idea of what this demographic Trump supporters looks like. The internet, anti-SJW group. An internet based Napoleon complex in a way.

Don't worry, I don't care that you're a cuck beta. It is ok.

@mld-woody said:

Damn cuck, no need to be so salty.

So you got trolled into the ground a few threads ago. Man up and move on.

You post on STACK OVERFLOW. You're not some beta

Trolling is the same thing as being an asshole?

Your girlfriend's asshole is nice btw, she keeps it clean

@bbedward said:

Damn cuck, no need to be so salty.

So you got trolled into the ground a few threads ago. Man up and move on.

You post on STACK OVERFLOW. You're not some beta

@jbluhm86 said:

http://www.cato.org/blog/libertarian-candidate-gary-johnsons-proposal-would-end-illegal-immigration

"Our politicians, both right and left, have created a system for legal immigration that simply doesnt work. We have artificial quotas. We have caps on certain categories of workers that have no real relationship to the realities of the free market. Its no coincidence that recent history shows the only successful way to reduce illegal immigration is to have a recession. Over the past 10 years, both illegal entries and the number of undocumented immigrants in the country have declined. Thats not because the government did anything right. .

Try this, instead: No caps. No categories. No quotas. Just a straightforward background check, the proper paperwork to obtain a real Social Security number and work legally or prove legitimate family ties, and a reliable system to know who is coming and who is going."

Wow...what a madman, compared to, say, an unfeasible wall built and financed by a foreign company...

The reason I posted the video is because he was bitching repeatedly about illegal immigrants being called illegal, not much else than that.

But not secure the border, remove caps on immigration - many people have valid reasons for disagreeing with stuff like that.

"Our politicians, both right and left, have created a system for legal immigration that simply doesnt work. We have artificial quotas. We have caps on certain categories of workers that have no real relationship to the realities of the free market. Its no coincidence that recent history shows the only successful way to reduce illegal immigration is to have a recession. Over the past 10 years, both illegal entries and the number of undocumented immigrants in the country have declined. Thats not because the government did anything right. .

Try this, instead: No caps. No categories. No quotas. Just a straightforward background check, the proper paperwork to obtain a real Social Security number and work legally or prove legitimate family ties, and a reliable system to know who is coming and who is going."

Wow...what a madman, compared to, say, an unfeasible wall built and financed by a foreign company...

@bbedward said:

And that is exactly why he said it. I expect full on pandering mode in order to try to corral that 15% before the debates.

@bbedward said:

Yeah you get some that are teetering real close to being anarchists.

But libertarianism is really pretty crazy on the extreme side of the spectrum. No government, open borders basically.

@westside-steve said:

I am a libertarian but that part of the platform for some of the members is not kosher with me. You can't have open borders and still try to control the flow of criminals and diseased people.

@logicisforsquares said:

Johnson isn't a Ron Paul style libertarian. I haven't heard him advocating for no borders. The party has just as many different shades as any other party. Ron was so far libertarian that he thought that we should respond military via letters of marque.

WSS