@jbluhm86 said:

In Hillary's case it's more like accepting bribes through the Clinton Foundation and paying them off with access to the state department and special favors and then hiding the evidence. Remember that's what Richard Nixon was lynched for, hiding the evidence.

WSS

Can we all agree, that our current Government, lead by Obama isn't making some of the best decisions for this country? Turning a blind eye to your own parties indiscretions is worse than digging up the past.

That's like you confronting your spouse for verifiable evidence that speaks to her cheating on you and she bring's up the fact you kissed another girl 30 years ago in high school.

But the liberals will condemn Trump for saying he likes to grab pussy, but turned a blind eye to Clinton when he was in the white house and all the indiscretions he had yet jump on this emotional bandwagon for one chauvinistic comment, that if you are a man, you've said something very similar if not worse behind closed doors to your "buddies' too.

I have a horrible feeling that my children will be subject to, witness, and die in a horrific war that our government help enable.

@calfoxwc said:

This, coming from you, is hilarious. You constantly change subjects of a conversation to suit whatever crackpot thoughts you have floating around in your dome at that moment. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds; I can't even take you seriously at this point.

they will go back all those years, all the way to Reagan to make an asswhole point that doesn't mean anything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause,^[6]the evidence is disputed as to whether he authorized the diversion of the money raised by the Iranian arms sales to the Contras.^[

Reagan returned to the airwaves in a nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for any actions that he was unaware of, and admitting that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".

Iran was a lot different all those years ago, JblewandlickedobaMaobutt.

It has nothing to do with 1.7 BILLION ACTUAL DOLLARS that Iran is going to use to buy fighter jets.

Jblew is just another liberal wimp who has to change the subject, divert from it, and excuse everything wrong that is CURRENTLY

wrong.

@the-cysko-kid said:

Iran-contra was a major scandal. We're just supposed to ignore this now because a dead guy did something 30 years ago?

Of course not. But it just amuses me that some of the conservatives on here can express outrage at this, while at the same time extol the virtues of Reagan, who's administration did pretty much the same thing by funneling arms and money to Iran. Those who are on a Democrat witch hunt should take care to also remember their own party's sins, both past and present, as well .

@jbluhm86 said:

How many years did Ronald Reagan serve for feeding money and weapons to Iran during Iran-Contra, again?

Iran-contra was a major scandal. We're just supposed to ignore this now because a dead guy did something 30 years ago?

@calfoxwc said:

big serious trouble.

lock her up, and put obaMao in with her... throw away the key.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iranian-military-sending-elite-forces-u-s-europe/

How many years did Ronald Reagan serve for feeding money and weapons to Iran during Iran-Contra, again?